Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient approach for calculating default probabilities for cash-flow based project finance with reserve account

  • Published:
Computing and Visualization in Science

Abstract

The quantitative assessment of risks associated with several types, eg, rating methods for cash-flow driven projects, can be reduced to determining the probability that a random variable, for instance representing a cash-flow, drops below a given threshold. That probability can be derived in an analytic closed form, if the underlying distribution is not too complex. However, in practice there is often a reserve account in place, which saves excess cash to reduce the volatility of the cash-flow available for debt service. Due to the reserve account, the derivation of a solution in an analytic closed form is even in the case of rather simple underlying distributions, eg, independent Gaussian distribution, not feasible. In this paper, we present two very efficient approximation methodologies for calculating the probability that a random variable falls under a threshold allowing the presence of a reserve account. The first proposed approach is derived using transition probabilities. The resulting recursive scheme can be implemented easily and yields fast and stable results even in the case of dependent cash-flows. The second methodology uses the similarity of the considered stochastic processes with convection-diffusion processes and combines the stochastic transition probabilities with the finite volume method, which is well known for solving partial differential equations. We present numerical results for some realistic test problems demonstrating convergence of order h for the transition probability based approach and \(h^2\) for the combination with the finite volume method for sufficiently smooth probability distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bank, R.E., Rose, D.J.: Some error estimates for the box method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24, 777–787 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bressloff, P.C.: Stochastic Processes in Cell Biology. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, Z.: On the finite volume method. Numer. Math. 58, 713–735 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Capinski, M.: A model of credit risk based on cash flow. Comput. Math. Appl. 54, 499–506 (2007)

  5. Cetin, U., Jarrow, R., Protter, P., Yildrim, Y.: Modelling credit risk with partial information. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14, 1167–1178 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Coffey, W.T., Kalmykov, Y.P., Waldron, J.T.: The Langevin Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics, Chemistry, and Electrical Engineering. World Scientifc, Singapore (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crosbie, P., Bohn, J.: Modeling Default Risk. Moody’s KMV, Technical Report (2003)

  8. Das, S.R., Hanouna, P.: Implied recovery. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 33(11), 1837–1857 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardiner, C.W.: Handbook of Stochastic Methods. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Hackbusch, W.: Multigrid Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hackbusch, W.: On first and second order box schemes. Computing 41, 277–296 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolmogorov, A.: Über die analytischen Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung (On analytical methods in the theory of probability). Math. Ann. 104, 415–458 (1931)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwak, H.K., Ingall, L.: Exploring Monte Carlo simulation applications for project management. Risk Manag. 9, 44–57 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Merton, R.: On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance 29, 449–470 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rausch, R., Schäfer, W., Therrien, R., Wagner, C.: Solute Transport Modelling—An Introduction to Models and Solution Strategies. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers, Stuttgart (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Risken, H.: The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber, F., Schmid, T., Pietz, M., Kaserer, C.: Simulation based valuation of project finance—Does model complexity really matter? Working Paper No. 2010–3, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies, TU München (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Wagner.

Additional information

Communicated by Gabriel Wittum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riemer, S., Wagner, C. An efficient approach for calculating default probabilities for cash-flow based project finance with reserve account. Comput. Visual Sci. 17, 203–216 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-015-0258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-015-0258-7

Keywords

Navigation