Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnic differences in parental detection of externalizing disorders

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous research has reported lower treatment rates for externalizing disorders among non-Western children as compared to Western children. Ethnic differences in parental detection may be an explanation for this discrepancy.

Aims

In a cross-sectional study among the four largest ethnic groups in the Netherlands, namely Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish and Surinamese, we examined the influence of ethnicity on parental detection of behavioural disorders.

Method

A total of 270 children (aged 6–10 years) and their parents were interviewed regarding psychiatric disorders and socio-demographic data. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using standard definitions, with adjustment for parental educational level.

Results

Sensitivity to detect any externalizing disorder and ADHD in particular was significantly lower among Moroccan and Surinamese parents when compared to Dutch parents. Sensitivity to detect ADHD tended to be lower among Turkish parents. Specificity to detect any externalizing disorder was higher among Moroccan and Turkish parents. Specificity to detect ADHD was higher among Moroccan parents and tended to be higher among Turkish parents.

Conclusions

The detection rate of externalizing disorders is markedly lower among non-Dutch parents than among Dutch parents. This finding emphasizes the importance of taking parents’ cultural context into account when appraising their report on possible externalizing disorders in their children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biederman J, Faraone S, Milberger S, Guite J, Mick E, Chen L, Mennin D, Marrs A, Ouellette C, Moore P, Spencer T, Norman D, Wilens T, Kraus I, Perrin J (1996) A prospective 4-year follow-up study of attention-deficit hyperactivity and related disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53:437–446

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyle MH, Offord DR, Racine Y, Sanford M, Szatmari P, Fleming JE, Price-Munn N (1993) Evaluation of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents for use in general population samples. J Abnorm Child Psychol 21:663–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bussing R, Gary FA, Mills TL, Garvan CW (2003) Parental explanatory models of ADHD: gender and cultural variations. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:563–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eapen V, Ghubash R (2004) Help-seeking for mental health problems of children: preferences and attitudes in the United Arab Emirates. Psychol Rep 94:663–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erol N, Arslan LB, Akçakin M (1995) The adaptation and standardization of the Child Behavior Checklist among 6–18 year-old Turkish children. In: Sergeant E (eds) Eunethydis: European Approaches to Hyperkinetic Disorder. Fotorotar, Zurich, pp 97–113

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hackett L, Hackett R (1993) Parental ideas of normal and deviant child behaviour. A comparison of two ethnic groups. Br J Psychiatry 162:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Junger M, Terlouw GJ, van der Heijden PGM (1995) Crime, accidents and social control. Crim Behav Mental Health 5:386–410

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kadesjo B, Gillberg C (2001) The comorbidity of ADHD in the general population of Swedish school-age children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalliopuska M (1992) Social desirability related to social class among adults. Psychol Rep 70:808–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kasius MC (1997) Interviewing children. Development of the Dutch version of the Semi-structured Clinical Interview for Children and Adolescents (SCICA) and testing of the psychometric properties. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knol FA (1998) Van hoog naar laag; van laag naar hoog (From high to low; from low to high). Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kosten TA, Rounsaville BJ (1992) Sensitivity of psychiatric diagnosis based on the best estimate procedure. Am J Psychiatry 149:1225–1227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambert MC, Weisz JR, Knight F, Desrosiers MF, Overly K, Thesiger C (1992) Jamaican and American adult perspectives on child psychopathology: further exploration of the threshold model. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:146–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewczyk CM, Garland AF, Hurlburt MS, Gearity J, Hough RL (2003) Comparing DISC-IV and clinician diagnoses among youths receiving public mental health services. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mann EM, Ikeda Y, Mueller CW, Takahashi A (1992) Cross-cultural differences in rating hyperactive-disruptive behaviors in children. Am J Psychiatry 149:1539–1542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Konig PH, Giampino TL (1989) Hyperactive boys almost grown up. IV. Criminality and its relationship to psychiatric status. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:1073–1079

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McConaughy SH, Achenbach TM (2001) Manual for the semistructured clinical interview for children and adolescents. University of Vermont, Burlington.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MTA Cooperative Group (1999) A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The MTA Cooperative Group. Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56:1073–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muris P, Meesters C, Van Den BF (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)–further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pels T (2003) Respect van twee kanten; Een studie over last van Marokkaanse jongeren (The question of respect; A study on misconduct of Moroccan boys) Koninklijke van Gorcum, Assen

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puig M, Lambert MC, Rowan GT, Winfrey T, Lyubansky M, Hannah SD, Hill MF (1999) Behavioral and emotional problems among Jamaican and African American Children, Ages 6 to 11: Teacher Reports versus Direct Observations. J Emotion Behav Disorders 7:240–251

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rothenberger A, Woerner W (2004) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)–evaluations and applications. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II1–II2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Safer DJ, Malever M (2000) Stimulant treatment in Maryland public schools. Pediatrics 106:533–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Satterfield JH, Schell A (1997) A prospective study of hyperactive boys with conduct problems and normal boys: adolescent and adult criminality. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:1726–1735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sayal K, Taylor E, Beecham J, Byrne P (2002) Pathways to care in children at risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 181:43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwab-Stone ME, Shaffer D, Dulcan MK, Jensen PS, Fisher P, Bird HR, Goodman SH, Lahey BB, Lichtman JH, Canino G, Rubio-Stipec M, Rae DS (1996) Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:878–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaffer D, Fisher P, Lucas CP, Duldan MK, Schwab-Stone ME (2000) NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:28–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sonuga-Barke EJS, Minocha K (1993) Inter-ethnic bias in teachers’ ratings of childhood hyperactivity. Br J Dev Psychol 11:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stevens GW, Pels T, Bengi-Arslan L, Verhulst FC, Vollebergh WA, Crijnen AA (2003) Parent, teacher and self-reported problem behavior in The Netherlands: comparing Moroccan immigrant with Dutch and with Turkish immigrant children and adolescents. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:576–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Widenfelt BM, Goedhart AW, Treffers PD, Goodman R (2003) Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weisz JR, Chaiyasit W, Weiss B, Eastman KL, Jackson EW (1995) A multimethod study of problem behavior among Thai and American children in school: teacher reports versus direct observations. Child Dev 66:402–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Weisz JR, McCarty CA (1999) Can we trust parent reports in research on cultural and ethnic differences in child psychopathology? Using the bicultural family design to test parental culture effects. J Abnorm Psychol 108:598–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zwirs BWC, Burger H, Schulpen TWJ, Buitelaar JK (xxxx) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among children of different ethnic origin. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  35. Zwirs BWC, Burger H, Schulpen TWJ, Buitelaar JK (2006) Different treatment thresholds in non-Western children with behavioral problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45(4):476–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ZON-MW), grant number 99–9.1–64, by the Foundation for Children’s Welfare Stamps Netherlands and by the Province of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara W.C. Zwirs MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zwirs, B.W., Burger, H., Buitelaar, J.K. et al. Ethnic differences in parental detection of externalizing disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 15, 418–426 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0550-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0550-7

Keywords

Navigation