Abstract
Objectives
The goal of this study is to contribute to a better quantitative description of the early stages of osseointegration, by application of fractal, multifractal, and lacunarity analysis.
Materials and methods
Fractal, multifractal, and lacunarity analysis are performed on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of titanium implants that were first subjected to different treatment combinations of i) sand blasting, ii) acid etching, and iii) exposition to calcium phosphate, and were then submersed in a simulated body fluid (SBF) for 30 days. All the three numerical techniques are applied to the implant SEM images before and after SBF immersion, in order to provide a comprehensive set of common quantitative descriptors.
Results
It is found that implants subjected to different physicochemical treatments before submersion in SBF exhibit a rather similar level of complexity, while the great variety of crystal forms after SBF submersion reveals rather different quantitative measures (reflecting complexity), for different treatments. In particular, it is found that acid treatment, in most combinations with the other considered treatments, leads to a higher fractal dimension (more uniform distribution of crystals), lower lacunarity (lesser variation in gap sizes), and narrowing of the multifractal spectrum (smaller fluctuations on different scales).
Conclusion
The current quantitative description has shown the capacity to capture the main features of complex images of implant surfaces, for several different treatments. Such quantitative description should provide a fundamental tool for future large scale systematic studies, considering the large variety of possible implant treatments and their combinations.
Clinical relevance
Quantitative description of early stages of osseointegration on titanium implants with different treatments should help develop a better understanding of this phenomenon, in general, and provide basis for further systematic experimental studies. Clinical practice should benefit from such studies in the long term, by more ready access to implants of higher quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Layrolle P, Amouriq Y, Le Gunnec L, Soueidan A (2007) Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 23:844–854
Bagno A, Di Bello C (2004) Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:935–949
Malhi Y, Román-Cuesta RM (2008) Analysis of lacunarity and scales of spatial homogeneity in IKONOS images of Amazonian tropical forest canopies. Remote Sens Environ 112:2074–2087
Velazquez-Camilo O, Bolaños-Reynoso E, Rodriguez E, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2010) Characterization of cane sugar crystallization using image fractal analysis. J Food Eng 100:77–84
Caniego FJ, Espejo R, Martin MA, San José F (2005) Multifractal scaling of soil spatial variability. Ecol Model 182:291–303
Sachs D, Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (2002) The multifractal scaling of cloud radiances from 1m to 1km. Fractals 10:253–257
Chung HW, Huang YH (2000) Fractal analysis of nuclear medicine images for the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema. Am J Roentgenol 174:1055–1059
Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov P, Peng CK, Stanley HE (2002) Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. PNAS 99:2466–2472
Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G (2011) Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 39:273–292
Updike SX, Nowzari H (2008) Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res 43:658–664
dos Santos LCB, Carvalho AAT, Leao JC, Duarte-Neto PJ, Stosic T, Stosic B (2015) Fractal measure and microscopic modeling of osseointegration. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent; accepted for publication
Perotti V, Aprile G, Degidi M, Piatelli A, Lezzi G (2011) Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 31:633–639
Lezzi G, Aprile G, Tripodi D, Scarano A, Piatelli A, Perotti V (2012) Implant surface topographies analyzed using fractal dimension. Implant Dent 20:131–138
Ehrenfest D (2011) Fractal patterns applied to implant surface: definitions and perspectives. J Oral Implantol 37:506–509
Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geomeytry of nature. Freeman, San Francisco
Zaia A, Eleonori R, Maponi P, Rossi R, Murri R (2006) MR imaging and osteoporosis: fractal lacunarity analysis of trabecular bone. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10:484–489
Yasar F, Akqunlu F (2005) Fractal dimension and lacunarity of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 34:261–267
Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New York
Stosic T, Stosic B (2006) Multifractal analysis of human retinal vessels. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25:1101–1107
Lopes R, Betrouni N (2009) Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review. Med Image Anal 13:634–649
L. Seuront, Fractals and multifractals in ecology and aquatic science, Taylor & Francis 2009, 400p
Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (2007) Scale, scaling and multifractals in geophysics: twenty years on. Nonlinear dynamics in Geosciences, Ed. A.A. Tsonis, J. Elsner, Springer, 311-337
Guo CY, Tang ATH, Matinlinna JP (2012) Insights into surface treatment methods of titanium dental implants. J Adhes Sci Technol 26:189–205
Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915
Theiller J (1990) Estimating fractal dimension. J Opt Soc Am 7:1055–1073
Allain C, Cloitre M (1991) Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Phys Rev A 44:3552–3558
Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW, Prestegaard K, Perlmutter M (1996) Lacunarity analysis: a general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. Phys Rev E 53:5461–5468
Myint SW, Lam N (2005) A study of lacunarity-based texture analysis approaches to improve urban image classification. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:501–523
Chhabra A, Jensn RV (1989) Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum. Phys Rev Lett 62:1327–1330
Shimizu Y, Thurner S, Ehrenberger K (2002) Multifractal spectra as a measure of complexity in human posture. Fractals 10:103–116
de Benicio RB, Stosic T, de Figueiredo PH, Stosic B (2013) Multifractal behavior of wild-land and forest fire time series in Brazil. Phys A 392:6367–6374
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by research grants from CNPq, CAPES and FACEPE (Brazilian research agencies), and MINCYT (Argentinean Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Souza Santos, D., dos Santos, L.C.B., de Albuquerque Tavares Carvalho, A. et al. Multifractal spectrum and lacunarity as measures of complexity of osseointegration. Clin Oral Invest 20, 1271–1278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1606-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1606-1