Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical efficacy and patients' acceptance of a rubber interdental bristle. A randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Interdental cleaning is an essential component of home plaque control to prevent periodontitis and caries. There is limited data on the efficacy of commonly used metal-core interdental brushes in comparison to metal-free interdental brushes. The aim of this study was to compare a new rubber interdental bristle (Fuchs®) with a standard metal-core interdental brush (TePe®) for their impact upon gingival bleeding, plaque removal, and patient experience.

Materials and methods

A single-blind, prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial with a crossover design was used to measure plaque index (Turesky-Modified Quigley & Hein Index), bleeding index (Eastman Interdental Bleeding Index by Caton & Polson), and patient satisfaction by means of questionnaires in 39 patients. Each patient was randomly assigned with regard to the sequence of interdental product used and recalled.

Results

Both groups showed statistically significant decreases of plaque after a single usage, respectively. Bleeding was statistically significantly reduced after 4 weeks, with no statistically significant differences concerning between the two tested interdental brushes. Rubber interdental bristles reached significantly higher scores with regard to patient acceptance in overall assessment and in sub-items for less pain during usage, comfort of brushing, and willingness to buy the product.

Conclusion

Rubber interdental bristles were similarly effective compared to the interdental brushes. In addition, rubber interdental bristles were significantly more comfortable for participants than metal-core brushes.

Clinical relevance

Rubber interdental bristles can be used as an alternative interdental cleaning product which may be more accepted by patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axelsson P, Nyström B, Lindhe J (2004) The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 31:749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berchier CE, Slot DE, Haps S, Van der Weijden GA (2008) The efficacy of dental floss in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:265–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blieden TM, Caton JG, Proskin HM, Stein SH, Wagener CJ (1992) Examiner reliability for an invasive gingival bleeding index. J Clin Periodontol 19:262–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caton J, Polson AM (1985) The interdental bleeding index: a simplified procedure for monitoring gingival health. Compend Contin Educ Dent 6:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caton J, Polson A, Bouwsma O, Blieden T, Frantz B, Espeland M (1988) Associations between bleeding and visual signs of interdental gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 59:722–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charon J, Sandele P, Joachim F (1990) Iatrogenic interdental brushing. Apropos of a case. J Parodontol 9:51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chongcharoen N, Lulic M, Lang NP (2011) Effectiveness of different interdental brushes on cleaning the interproximal surfaces of teeth and implants: a randomized controlled, double-blind cross-over study. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Christou V, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden FA (1998) Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss. J Periodontol 69:759–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dörfer C, Oliveira S, Staehle H (1994) Characterisation of interdental brushes (in German). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 49:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiger RD, Nylund K, Feller RP (1991) A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes. J Clin Periodontol 18:681–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang NP, Cullinan MP, Holborow DW, Heitz-Mayfield LJA (2010) Examiner training standardization and calibration in periodontal studies. In: Giannobile WV, Burt B, Genco RJ (eds) Clinical research in oral health, chapter 9. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 159–175

  12. Lindfors E, Helkimo M, Magnusson T (2011) Patients’ adherence to hard acrylic interocclusal appliance treatment in general dental practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 35:133–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P (2007) The Hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:30

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCracken GI, Heasman L, Stacey F, Kelly PJ, Heasman PA (2000) Testing the efficacy of plaque removal of a prototype brush head for a powered toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol 27:542–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCracken GI, Steen N, Preshaw P, Heasman L, Stacey F, Heasman PA (2005) The crossover design to evaluate the efficacy of plaque removal in tooth-brushing studies. J Clin Periodontol 32:1157–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Pfingsten M (2002) Development and evaluation of the multidimensional German pain questionnaire. Schmerz 16:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oringer RJ (2002) Modulation of the host response in periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 73:460–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piantadosi S (1997) Clinical trials: A methodologic perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New York

  20. Renz A, Ide M, Newton T, Robinson PG, Smith D (2007) Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal diseases. Cochrane Db Syst Rev Issue 2. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005097.pub2/abstract. Accessed 04 June 2012

  21. Schüz B, Sniehotta FF, Wiedeman A, Seemann R (2006) Adherence to a daily flossing regimen in university students: effects of planning when, where, how and what to do in the face of barriers. J Clin Periodontol 33:612–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Slot DE, Dörfer CE, Van der Weijden GA (2008) The efficacy of interdental brushes on plaque and parameters of periodontal inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:253–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WJ, Payne AGT, Thomson WM, Wennström JL (2002) Relative effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushes in elderly patients with implant‐supported mandibular overdentures. J Clin Periodontol 29:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I (1970) Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol 41:41–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Der Weijden F, Slot DE (2011) Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontol 55:104–123

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wolff D, Joerss D, Dörfer CE (2006) In vitro-cleaning efficacy of interdental brushes with different stiffness and different diameter. Oral Health Prevent Dent 4:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yost KG, Mallatt ME, Liebman J (2006) Interproximal gingivitis and plaque reduction by four interdental products. J Clin Dent 17:79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest and source of funding statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan P. Woelber.

Additional information

Thaer Abouassi and Johan P Woelber contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abouassi, T., Woelber, J.P., Holst, K. et al. Clinical efficacy and patients' acceptance of a rubber interdental bristle. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1873–1880 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1164-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1164-3

Keywords

Navigation