Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) in resin-based composites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irradiation time and specimens thickness on the polymerization kinetic and variation in micro-mechanical properties of two commercial resin-based composites (RBCs) based on radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) technology™, and to compare them with four camphorquinone (CQ)/amine-based RBCs.

Materials and methods

The materials were analysed by assessing the polymerization kinetic and the degree of cure (DC) at 0.1 mm and 2 mm depth during 5 minutes after photoinitiation, after curing for 10 s, 20 s and 40 s (Elipar Freelight2). The variation in micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness (HV), indentation modulus (E), and depth of cure (DOC)) was assessed in 100 μm steps on 6-mm-high specimens irradiated as above and stored in the water for 24 h at 37 °C.

Results

The results were statistically compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05) and a general linear model. The parameter material exerted the strongest effect on DC (partial eta-squared η p 2 = 0.83), followed by irradiation time (η p 2 = 0.27), and depth (η p 2 = 0.09). The polymerization kinetic, well described by an exponential sum function, showed in all materials a faster decrease in carbon–carbon double bonds at 0.1 mm than at 2 mm depth. The materials based on RAP achieved the highest DC values and a faster polymerization at both depths. The irradiation time exerted the strongest effect on the mechanical properties (DOC, η p 2 = 0.96; HV, η p 2 = 0.89; E, η p 2 = 0.86), followed by depth (HV, η p 2 = 0.63; E, η p 2 = 0.54) and material (HV, η p 2 = 0.40; E, η p 2 = 0.67). At the most favorable curing conditions (40 s, surface), the mechanical properties of the analyzed materials varied between 11.38 (0.80) GPa in Estelite® Sigma Quick and 20.80 (1.42) GPa in Estelite® Posterior for E, and between 74.33 (3.56) N/mm2 in Tetric EvoCeram® and 120.71 (6.24) N/mm2 in Estelite® Posterior for HV.

Conclusions

RAP-initiated material demonstrated a higher increase in DOC with prolonged irradiation time than the analyzed CQ/amine based materials.

Clinical relevance

An irradiation time of 20 s is also recommended for RAP-initiated RBCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jakubiak J, Allonas X, Fouassier J, Sionkowska A, Andrzejewska E, Linden L et al (2003) Camphorquinone—amines photoinitating systems for the initiation of free radical polymerization. Polymer 44:5219–5226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stansbury JW (2000) Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 12:300–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teshima W, Nomura Y, Tanaka N, Urabe H, Okazaki M, Nahara Y (2003) ESR study of camphorquinone/amine photoinitiator systems using blue light-emitting diodes. Biomaterials 24:2097–2103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M (2004) Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. Eur J Oral Sci 112:280–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moszner N, Salz U (2007) Recent developments of new components for dental adhesives and composites. Macromol Mater Eng 292:245–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asmusen S, Arenas G, Cook WD, Vallo C (2009) Photobleaching of camphorquinone during polymerization of dimethacrylate-based resins. Dent Mater 25:1603–1611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leprince JG, Leveque P, Nysten B, Gallez B, Devaux J, Leloup G (2012) New insight into the “depth of cure” of dimethacrylate-based dental composites. Dent Mater 28:512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore BK, Platt JA, Borges G, Chu TM, Katsilieri I (2008) Depth of cure of dental resin composites: ISO 4049 depth and microhardness of types of materials and shades. Oper Dent 33:408–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaub KM (2010) The effect of a novel photoinitiator system (RAP) on dental resin composites' flexural strength, polymerization stress, and degree of conversion. Dentistry School Theses and Dissertations, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2080

  10. Hamielec AE, Tobita H (2000) Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley, New York. doi:10.1002/14356007.a21_305.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Utterodt A, al. e. (2008) Dental composites with Tricyclo[5.2.02.6]decane derivatives. European Patent EP1935393 assignee: Heraeus Kulzer GmbH.

  12. Zhang Y, Xu J (2008) Effect of immersion in various media on the sorption, solubility, elution of unreacted monomers, and flexural properties of two model dental composite compositions. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19:2477–2483

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt C, Ilie N (2012) The mechanical stability of nano-hybrid composites with new methacrylate monomers for matrix compositions. Dent Mater 28:152–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frauscher KE, Ilie N (2012) Depth of cure and mechanical properties of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Investig 16:1425–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frauscher KE, Ilie N (2013) Degree of conversion of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Investig 17:635–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Durner J, Obermaier J, Draenert M, Ilie N (2012) Correlation of the degree of conversion with the amount of elutable substances in nano-hybrid dental composites. Dent Mater 28:1146–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ilie N, Obermaier J, Durner J (2013) Effect of modulated irradiation time on the degree of conversion and the amount of elutable substances from nano-hybrid resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0934-2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catalgil-Giz H, Giz A, Oncul-Koc A (1999) Termination mechanism of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene studied by ultrasonic degradation technique. Polym Bull (Berlin) 43:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braem M, Finger W, Van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1989) Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 5:346–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 13:427–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G (2007) Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 23:51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O (2002) The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87:642–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilie N, Rencz A, Hickel R (2013) Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 17:185–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr (1994) Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125:687–701

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y (1995) Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 8:173–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The measurements of the mechanical properties in this study were supported in part by the company Tokuyama-Dental.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicoleta Ilie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilie, N., Kreppel, I. & Durner, J. Effect of radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) in resin-based composites. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1081–1088 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1085-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1085-1

Keywords

Navigation