Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo assessment of DNA damage induced in oral mucosa cells by fixed and removable metal prosthodontic appliances

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given long-term effect on oral tissues due to contact with dental appliances, the biocompatibility studies of casting alloys are of great importance. It has been previously documented that metal dental appliances, due to corrosion, might induce genotoxic and mutagenic effects in cells. Therefore, the aim of presented study was to examine the genotoxicity of two dental casting alloys (Co-Cr-Mo and Ni-Cr) commonly used in fixed and removable prosthodontic appliances that are in contact with the oral epithelium for 5 years or more. For that purpose, 55 age-matched subjects were included in the study; 30 wearers of prosthodontic appliances and 25 controls. Buccal cells of oral mucosa were collected and processed for further analysis. The cell viability has been assessed by trypan blue exclusion test, while genotoxic effect of metal ions on DNA in oral mucosa cells was studied by use of alkaline comet assay. Results have shown significantly higher comet assay parameters (tail length and percentage DNA in the tail) in the group wearing metal appliances. Both subjects with Co-Cr-Mo alloy and Ni-Cr alloy showed significantly higher comet assay parameters when compared with controls. It has been confirmed that metal ions released by the two base metal dental casting alloys examined in this study, might be responsible for DNA damage of oral mucosa cells. Therefore, the results of this study emphasize the importance of the in vivo evaluation of dental materials with respect to their genotoxicity, which is of major importance to ensure long-term biocompatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Wataha JC (2000) Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys: a review. J Prosthet Dent 83:223–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmalz G, Garhammer P (2002) Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. Dent Mater 18:396–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Medical Devices [homepage/database on the Internet]._Brussels:_ European Union;_c2010_: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/single_market_for_goods/technical_harmonisation/121010b_en.htm. Accessed 08 September 2010

  4. Geurtsen W (2002) Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:71–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faccioni F, Franceschetti P, Cerpelloni M, Fracasso ME (2003) In vivo study on metal release from fixed orthodontic appliances and DNA damage in oral mucosa cells. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:687–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D (2009) Biocompatibility of dental materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Westphalen GH, Menezes LM, Pra D, Garcia GG, Schimtt VM, Henriques JAP, Medina Silva R (2008) In vivo determination of genotoxicity induced by metals from orthodontic appliances using micronucleus and comet assay. Genet Mol Res 7:1259–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Besarati Nia A, Van Straaten HWM, Godschalk RWL, Van Zandwijk N, Balm AJM, Kleinjans JCS, Van Schooten FJ (2000) Immunoperoxidase detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in mouth floor and buccal mucosa cells of smokers and nonsmokers. Environ Mol Mutagen 36:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh NP, Mc Coy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175:184–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinhal D, Gontijo AM, Reyes VA, Salvadori DM (2006) Viable human buccal mucosa cells do not yield typical nucleoids: impacts on the single-cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay. Environ Mol Mutagen 47:117–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang HW, Chou LS, Chou MY, Chang YC (2003) Assessment of genetic damage by methyl methacrylate employing in vitro mammalian test system. Biomaterials 24:2909–2914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhawan A, Anderson D (2009) Comet assay in toxicology. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Pindborg JJ (1986) Pathology and treatment of diseases in oral mucous membranes and salivary glands. In: Holm-Pedersen P, Löe H (eds) Geriatric dentistry. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, p 290

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weng H, Weng Z, Lu Y, Nakayama K, Morimoto K (2010) Effects of alcohol-drinking behaviour and ADH1B and ALDH2 polymorphisms on basal DNA damage in human mononuclear cells as determined by the comet assay. Mutat Res 701:132–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sesso HD (2001) Alcohol and cardiovascular health: recent findings. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 1:167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kokoska ER, Smith GS, Deshpande Y, Rieckenberg CL, Miller TA (1998) Adaptive cytoprotection induced by ethanol in human intestinal cells: role of prostaglandins and calcium homeostasis. Ann Surg 228:123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishikawa H, Yamamoto H, Tian Y, Kawano M, Yamauchi T, Yokoyama K (2003) Effects of ALDH2 gene polymorphisms and alcohol-drinking behavior on micronuclei frequency in non-smokers. Mutat Res 541(1–2):71–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reis SR, Sadigursky M, Andrade MG, Soares LP, Espirito Santo AR, Vilas Boas DS (2002) Genotoxic effect of ethanol on oral mucosa cells. Pesqui Odontol Bras 16:221–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Närhi TO, Ainamo A, Meurman JH (1993) Salivary yeasts, saliva, and oral mucosa in the elderly. J Dent Res 72:1009–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato T (1995) A study effect of mechanical irritation in development and progression of tongue cancer. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 62:532–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Craig RG, O’Brien WJ, Powers JM (1983) Dental materials, properties and manipulation. The C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the financial help of the Croatian Ministry of Science Education and Sports (Projects: 065-0982464-2532, 335-0000000-3532, and 022-0222148-2137). Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Laboratory for Systems Biomedicine, is acknowledged for access to a part of equipment used in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marinka Baričević.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baričević, M., Ratkaj, I., Mladinić, M. et al. In vivo assessment of DNA damage induced in oral mucosa cells by fixed and removable metal prosthodontic appliances. Clin Oral Invest 16, 325–331 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0489-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0489-4

Keywords

Navigation