Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the influence of two different cavity configurations on marginal stability of recent one bottle “etch & rinse” and “self-etch” adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities, before and after thermo-mechanical loading under simulation of dentinal fluid. Forty human upper molars were selected and assigned to five experimental groups. Intrapulpal pressure was maintained during cavity preparation, restoration placement, finishing and stressing. Standardized Class I and V-Shaped Class V cavities were prepared on each tooth. Half of the margins of Class V cavities were located in enamel and half in dentin. All cavities were restored with different adhesives systems and a nano-hybrid composite. Materials were light-cured using a LED unit. Restored teeth were loaded in a computer-controlled chewing machine with 1.2 million mechanical occlusal cycles simultaneously with 3,000 thermal cycles (5–50–5°C). Impressions were made with polyvinylsiloxane of each restoration before and after loading. Gold-coated epoxy replicas were prepared for SEM examination at ×200 magnification. Significant differences between materials were found both before and after loading (Kruskal–Wallis, Bonferroni, p < 0.05). Significant differences were also found between Class I and V restorations (Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Test, p < 0.05). Even before thermo-mechanical loading, none of the groups had 100% continuous margin. Marginal seal stability of recent one bottle “etch & rinse” and “self-etch” adhesives are significantly different and susceptible to cavity configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abo T, Uno S, Sano H (2004) Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all-in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci 112:286–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambretchts P (2001) Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 26:S119–S144

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC (2002) Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 33:213–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Proenca JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Erhardt MC, Aguilera FS, Garcia-Godoy F, Osorio R, Toledano M (2007) Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 23:1542–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE (2007) Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 97:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankenberger R, Tay FR (2005) Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo- mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 21:397–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R (2006) A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 7:79–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurokawa R, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Endo T, Kanehira M, Komatsu M, Manabe A (2007) Interactions of self-etch adhesives with resin composites. J Dent 35:923–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watts DC, Satterthwaite JD (2008) Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass. Dent Mater 24:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Braga RR, Boaro LC, Kuroe T, Azevedo CL, Singer JM (2006) Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and 'C' factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent Mater 22:818–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R (2004) Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 20:579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krejci I, Stavridakis M (2000) New perspectives on dentin adhesion—differing methods of bonding. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 12:727–732, quiz 734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bortolotto T, Ferrari M, Tay F, Krejci I (2007) Degradation of thermo-mechanically loaded adhesive Class V restorations after 18 months of water storage. Am J Dent 20:83–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bortolotto T, Ferrari M, Onisor I, Tay F, Krejci I (2005) Marginal adaptation of contemporary dentin bonding agents in enamel and dentin under the simulation of dentinal fluid. Dent S Africa 7:46–58

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F (1993) Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 72:490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heintze SD (2007) Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 1):S77–S106

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, Petschelt A (2003) Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin–dentin bond with the use of different methods. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 67:712–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozok AR, Wu MK, Ten Cate JM, Wesselink PR (2004) Effect of dentinal fluid composition on dentin demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 83:849–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Prati C (2007) Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 23:705–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F (1997) Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 22:21–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1995) Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 23:329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL (1993) Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 21:158–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1994) Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 22:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. da cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1997) Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 13:372–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Water treeing—a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 16:6–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Manhart J, Trumm C (2009) Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging. Clin Oral Investig. Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print]

  31. Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S, Fujishima A (1999) Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 24:323–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Krejci I, Hausler T, Sagesser LF (1994) New adhesives in Class V restorations under combined load and simulated dentinal fluid. Dent Mater 10:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB (2001) The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 17:268–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B (2003) Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 16:329–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur- cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 16:414–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P (2001) Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel–dentin/composite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 14:344–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yiu CK, King NM, Carrilho MR, Sauro S, Rueggeberg FA, Prati C, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2006) Effect of resin hydrophilicity and temperature on water sorption of dental adhesive resins. Biomaterials 27:1695–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hosaka K, Tagami J, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Carrilho M, Tay FR, Agee KA, Pashley DH (2007) Effect of wet vs. dry testing on the mechanical properties of hydrophilic self-etching primer polymers. Eur J Oral Sci 115:239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 69:726–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K (2003) Effect of self-etching primer containing N-acryloyl aspartic acid on enamel adhesion. Dent Mater 19:253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Yamauti M, Aksornmuang J, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Pashley DH, Tagami J (2007) Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine. J Dent 35:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH (2004) Fluid movement across the resin–dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res 83:843–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S Jr, Baratieri LN, Vieira LC (2005) Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 30:63–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sarr M, Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Kane AW, Vreven J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL (2009) Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. Clin Oral Investig. Aug 25. [Epub ahead of print]

  47. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 22:533–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, International University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan R. Mayoral & Miguel Roig

  2. Division of Cariology and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Juan R. Mayoral, Ladislav Gregor & Ivo Krejci

  3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, UNIFEB, Universitary Center of Barretos, Barretos, Brazil

    Edson A. Campos

  4. Department of Restorative Dentistry, International University of Catalonia, Josep Trueta, s/n, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan R. Mayoral

Authors
  1. Juan R. Mayoral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ladislav Gregor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edson A. Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miguel Roig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ivo Krejci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan R. Mayoral.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayoral, J.R., Gregor, L., Campos, E.A. et al. Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities. Clin Oral Invest 15, 257–264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0372-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0372-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation