Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of fatigue testing and cementation mode on the load-bearing capability of bovine incisors restored with crowns and zirconium dioxide posts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of fatigue and cementation mode on the fracture behavior of endodontically treated bovine incisors restored with zirconium dioxide posts and crowns. Forty-eight endodontically treated bovine primary incisors were restored with zirconium dioxide posts (Cerapost, Brasseler), composite build-ups, and crowns cast from a chromium cobalt alloy. In 16 teeth, each of the posts was cemented conventionally with KetacCem (3M ESPE) or adhesively with Panavia F (Kuraray) or RelyX UniCem (3M ESPE). One-half of the specimens in each group were subjected to thermocycling with 10,000 cycles at 5–55°C and mechanical aging, loading the specimens at an angle of 45° in 1,200,000 cycles with 50 N. Fracture resistance was determined by loading the specimens until fracture at an angle of 45° to the long axis of the teeth. The loading test showed that neither cementation mode nor fatigue testing had an influence on the load bearing capability. Most specimens fractured in a favorable way, independent from the type of cementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH (1998) Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 24:703–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bitter K, Paris S, Martus P, Schartner R, Kielbassa AM (2004) A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 37:840–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2006) Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 39:809–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM (2006) In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent 95:302–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A (2007) Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int 38:745–753

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottino MA, Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Galhano GA, Scotti R (2007) Effects of mechanical cycling on the bonding of zirconia and fiber posts to human root dentin. J Adhes Dent 9:327–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de la Macorra JC, Pradies G (2002) Conventional and adhesive luting cements. Clin Oral Investig 6:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Derand P, Derand T (2000) Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 13:131–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Rossier-Gerber A, Krejci I (2006) Adaptation of adhesive post and cores to dentin after in vitro occlusal loading: evaluation of post material influence. J Adhes Dent 8:409–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M (1996) Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20(Suppl):S50–S56

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I (2003) Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 90:556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjor IA (2000) Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 13:255–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 13:15B–18B

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S (2001) Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 17:422–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH (2004) A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 17:476–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Ronnlof AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH (2006) In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci 114:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodis HE, Marshall GW Jr., White JM, Gee L, Hornberger B, Marshall SJ (1993) Storage effects on dentin permeability and shear bond strengths. Dent Mater 9:79–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FR, Grandini R, Ferrari M (2005) Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 18:399–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B, Bloching U (1993) Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater 9:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR (2002) Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 87:438–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Isidor F, Brondum K (1992) Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 5:257–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K (1996) Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 9:131–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W (1989) A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 2:51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A (2005) 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 21:709–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF (1999) Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1:153–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyenberg H, Lüthy H, Schärer P (1995) Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 7(2):73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD (2003) Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 34:301–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgano SM, Brackett SE (1999) Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 82:643–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T (1983) Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 62:1076–1081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D (2001) The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent 86:304–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nissan J, Parson A, Barnea E, Shifman A, Assif D (2007) Resistance to fracture of crowned endodontically treated premolars restored with ceramic and metal post systems. Quintessence Int 38:e120–e123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR (2006) Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 95:311–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nothdurft FP, Seidel E, Gebhart F, Naumann M, Motter PJ, Pospiech PR (2008) Influence of endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with class II cavities. J Dent 36:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paul SJ, Werder P (2004) Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass-ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 17:524–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pospiech P (2002) All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing? Clin Oral Investig 6:189–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC (2003) Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 29:125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rueggeberg FA (1991) Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure—review of the literature. Dent Mater 7:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sung EC, Tai ET, Chen T, Caputo AA (2002) Effect of irrigation solutions on dentin bonding agents and restorative shear bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 87:628–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tjan AH, Nemetz H (1992) Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 23:839–844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Torbjorner A, Fransson B (2004) A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 17:369–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Usumez A, Cobankara FK, Ozturk N, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S (2004) Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 92:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Ambjornsen E, Norheim PW (1997) Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. J Dent 25:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wegner SM, Kern M (2000) Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2:139–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH (1996) Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zalkind M, Hochman N (1998) Esthetic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 79:702–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

 

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. P. Nothdurft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nothdurft, F.P., Schmitt, T., Motter, P.J. et al. Influence of fatigue testing and cementation mode on the load-bearing capability of bovine incisors restored with crowns and zirconium dioxide posts. Clin Oral Invest 12, 331–336 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0205-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0205-9

Keywords

Navigation