Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Halogen and LED light curing of composite: temperature increase and Knoop hardness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the Knoop hardness and temperature increase provided by three light curing units when using (1) the manufacturers’ recommended times of photo-activation and (2) standardizing total energy density. One halogen – XL2500 (3M/ESPE) – and two light-emitting diode (LED) curing units – Freelight (3M/ESPE) and Ultrablue IS (DMC) – were used. A type-K thermocouple registered the temperature change produced by the composite photo-activation in a mold. Twenty-four hours after the photo-activation procedures, the composite specimens were submitted to a hardness test. Both temperature increase and hardness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5% significance). Using the first set of photo-activation conditions, the halogen unit produced a statistically higher temperature increase than did both LED units, and the Freelight LED resulted in a lower hardness than did the other curing units. When applying the second set of photo-activation conditions, the two LED units produced statistically greater temperature increase than did the halogen unit, whereas there were no statistical differences in hardness among the curing units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asmussen E (1982) Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scand J Dent Res 90:490–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2003) Influence of specimen diameter on the relationship between subsurface depth and hardness of a light-cured resin composite. Eur J Oral Sci 111:543–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldissarra P, Catapano S, Scotti R (1997) Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: a preliminary study. J Oral Rehab 24:801–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA (2002) Shedding new light on composite polymerization. Oper Dent 27:636–638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Čejková J, Típek S, Crkovská J, Ardan T, Láteník J, Èejka È, Midelfart A (2004) UV rays, the prooxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the cornea and oxidative eye damage. Physiol Res 53:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL (1987) A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 66:727–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferracane JL (1995) Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6:302–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodis HE, White JM, Andrews J, Watanabe LG (1989) Measurements of temperature generated by visible-light-cure lamps in an in vitro model. Dent Mater 5:230–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL (2002) Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. Dent Mater 18:463–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hannig M, Bott B (1999) In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing LCUs. Dent Mater 15:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. International Organization for Standardization Specification, ISO TS 10650 (1999) Dental equipment-powered polymerization activators. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G, Ristic M (2001) Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehabil 28:586–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhães DV, Bagnato VS (2001) Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 17:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loney RW, Price RB (2001) Temperature transmission of high-output light-curing units through dentin. Oper Dent 26:516–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Donaldson MM, Bowman CN (2003) The effect of light intensity on double bond conversion and flexural strength of a model, unfilled dental resin. Dent Mater 19:458–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nomoto R (1997) Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. Dent Mater J 16:60–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E (2000) Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater 16:330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P (2005) Knoop hardness of ten resin composites irradiated with high-power LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen lights. Biomaterials 26:2631–2641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG (1988) Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 67:932–937

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rueggeberg F (1999) Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:S4–S15

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Tango RN, Consani S, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L (2005) Pulp chamber temperature changes during resin composite photoactivation. Braz J Oral Sci 4:685–688

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schneider LF, Consani S, Sinhoreti M, Correr Sobrinho L, Milan F (2005) Temperature change and hardness with different resin composites and photo-activation methods. Oper Dent 30:516–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shortall AC, Harrington E (1998) Temperature rise during polymerization of light-activated resin composites. J Oral Rehab 25:908–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stansbury JW (2000) Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 12:300–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewardson DA, Shortall ACC, Harrington E, Lumley PJ (2004) Thermal changes and cure depths associated with a high intensity light activation unit. J Dent 32:643–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Uhl A, Mills RW, Jandt KD (2003) Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composite cured with LED and halogen technology. Biomaterials 24:1809–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vandewalle KS, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Erickson RL, Sakaguchi RL (2004) Effect of energy density on properties and marginal integrity of posterior resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 20:96–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yap AU, Seneviratne C (2001) Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent 26:460–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zach L, Cohen G (1965) Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 16:515–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Institute of Physics at the São Paulo University (USP, São Carlos Campus), especially to Prof. Dr. Cléber Renato Mendonça, for the spectrometer collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Consani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, L.F., Consani, S., Correr-Sobrinho, L. et al. Halogen and LED light curing of composite: temperature increase and Knoop hardness. Clin Oral Invest 10, 66–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0028-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0028-x

Keywords

Navigation