Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contamination level of alginate impressions arriving at a dental laboratory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The contamination level of alginate impressions delivered to a large dental laboratory in Sweden was determined. One hundred and seven consecutive alginate impressions were included during 7 days. Samples were taken and transferred into sterile physiological saline and analysed microbiologically for colony-forming units (cfu) as well as nonhemolytic, α-hemolytic, and β-hemolytic colonies. After sampling, the clinics were contacted and asked to fill in simple questionnaires about their routines of disinfecting impressions. The questionnaire study revealed that about half of the clinics had some kind of disinfection routine, while the others rinsed in running water only. Seventy-two percent of the impressions yielded growth of bacteria, with a median number of 1.3×102 cfu. Thirteen per cent of the samples yielded >103 cfu, with a maximum number of 3.4×104 cfu. The majority of isolates were non- and α-hemolytic bacteria. Growth was recorded in 61.3% of disinfected impressions, and the numbers of bacteria in disinfected and nondisinfected impressions were similar. These findings raise the question of whether impressions need to be disinfected or if proper handling and hygienic procedures are sufficient to block the possible route of infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sofou, .A., Larsen, .T., Fiehn, .NE. et al. Contamination level of alginate impressions arriving at a dental laboratory. Clin Oral Invest 6, 161–165 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0173-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0173-4

Navigation