Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heel bone mineral density and various oral diseases: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Observational studies demonstrated that the relationship between bone mineral density and oral diseases is mixed. To access the association between heel bone mineral density and various oral diseases, we conducted the Mendelian randomization analysis to explore the association.

Materials and Methods

Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian analysis was used to explore the relationship between heel bone mineral density and various oral diseases. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was used as the primary effect estimate, and various methods were applied to test the reliability and stability of the results, namely MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode.

Results

This study showed that there was a negative relationship between heel BMD and periodontitis when heel BMD was used as an exposure factor and periodontitis as an outcome factor (IVW OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75–0.95; p = 0.005). Bidirectional Mendelian randomization showed that there was no statistically significant association between periodontitis and heel bone mineral density when chronic periodontitis was the exposure factor (p > 0.05). And there was no significant relationship between heel bone mineral density and other oral diseases (dental caries, diseases of pulp and periapical tissues, impacted teeth, cleft lip, and cleft palate, oral and oropharyngeal cancer) (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed that there was a negative relationship between heel bone density and periodontitis, and the decrease in heel bone density could promote the occurrence of periodontitis. In addition, there was no statistically significant relationship between heel bone density and other oral diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aibar-Almazán A, Voltes-Martínez A, Castellote-Caballero Y, Afanador-Restrepo DF, Carcelén-Fraile MDC, López-Ruiz E (2022) Current status of the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci 23:9465

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alayash Z, Baumeister S-E, Reckelkamm SL et al (2022) Association between total body bone mineral density and periodontitis: A Mendelian randomization study. J Periodontol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments:effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 44:512–525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent JR, Foley CN, Grant AJ et al (2020) MendelianRandomization v0.5.0: updates to an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Wellcome Open Res. 5:252

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM et al (2020) Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res 4:186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou HH, Lu SL, Wang ST, Huang TH, Chen SL (2021) The association between bone mineral density and periodontal disease in middle-aged adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:3321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa SA, Ribeiro CCC, de Oliveira KR et al (2021) Low bone mineral density is associated with severe periodontitis at the end of the second decade of life: a population-based study. J Clin Periodontol 48:1322–1332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davey Smith G, Hemani G (2014) Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet 23:R89-98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies NM, von HinkeKesslerScholder S, Farbmacher H et al (2015) The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization. Statist in Med. 34:454–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. González LA, Vásquez GM, Molina JF (2009) Epidemiología de la osteoporosis. J Rev Colomb Reumatol 16:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0121-8123(09)70119-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadji P, Imani P, Wüster C et al (2015) Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with six quantitative ultrasonometry devices in women with hip fractures. Climacteric 18:411–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaprio J (2012) Twins and the mystery of missing heritability: the contribution of gene-environment interactions. J Intern Med 272:440–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JW, Kong KA, Kim HY, Lee HS et al (2014) The association between bone mineral density and Periodontitis in Korean adults (KNHANES 2008–2010). Oral Dis 20:609–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kribbs PJ (1990) Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women. J Prosthet Dent 63:218–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwon T, Lamster IB, Levin L (2021) Current concepts in the management of periodontitis. Int Dent J 71:462–476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA et al (2008) Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med 27:1133–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Odén A, Harvey NC et al (2015) Predictive ability of heel quantitative ultrasound for incident fractures: an individual-level meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 26:1979–1987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meunier PJ, Boivin G (1997) Bone mineral density reflects bone mass but also the degree of mineralization of bone: therapeutic implications. Bone 21:373–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris JA, Kemp JP, Youlten SE et al (2019) An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat Genet 51:258–266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0302-x. (Erratum in: Nat Genet. 2019 May;51(5):920)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Phipps KR, Chan BK, Madden TE, Geurs NC et al (2007) Longitudinal study of bone density and periodontal disease in men. J Dent Res 86:1110–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piroska M, Tarnoki DL, Szabo H, Jokkel Z, Meszaros S, Horvath C, Tarnoki AD (2021) Strong genetic effects on bone mineral density in multiple locations with two different techniques: results from a cross-sectional twin study. Medicina 57:248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Richards JB (2012) Zheng H-F & Spector TD Genetics of osteoporosis from genome-wide association studies: advances and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 13:576–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sidiropoulou-Chatzigiannis S, Kourtidou M, Tsalikis L (2007) The effect of osteoporosis on periodontal status, alveolar bone and orthodontic tooth movement. A literature review. J Int Acad Periodontol. 9:77–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallipakorn SA, Vallipakorn O, Sophonsritsuk A et al (2016) The optimal cut-points for weight and non-weight quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus to screen osteoporosis in postmenopausal women[J]. J Med Assoc Thai 99:249–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner GP, Zhang J (2011) The pleiotropic structure of the genotype phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat Rev Genet 12:204–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang CJ, McCauley LK (2016) Osteoporosis and Periodontitis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 14:284–291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolf DL, Lamster IB (2011) Contemporary concepts in the diagnosis of periodontal disease. Dent Clin North Am 55:47–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization (1991) Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1:114–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu B, Wang CY (2000) (2000) Osteoporosis and periodontal diseases—an update on their association and mechanistic links. Periodontol 89:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng J, Baird D, Borges MC et al (2017) Recent developments in mendelian randomization studies. Curr Epidemiol Rep 4:330–345

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank participants and staff of the FinnGen consortium, the UK Biobank, the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, and the European Bioinformatics Institute.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guiyang Science and Technology Plan Project (Effect of adenoid or tonsil hypertrophy on three-dimensional morphology of palate and its correlation [2023]48-28, Three-dimensional structure and hydrodynamics of adult airway affected by osseous arch expansion based on cortical incision [2019]9-7-5), and the Guiyang Health and Family Planning Commission (A preliminary study on the position analysis of CR and CO disordered condyle in adult patients with mandibular retraction [2015]041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y-SZ: Wrote the manuscript, find data, idea hypothesis, data analysis. J-KS: Find data, proofread the manuscript, experimental design. Z-JZ, J-GL: Proofread the manuscript, statistical evaluation. S-YL: Proofread the manuscript. J-XP: Proofread the manuscrip, statistical evaluation, contributed substantially to discussion.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian-Guo Liu or Ju-Xiang Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The present Mendelian randomization analysis was based on summary data from previous studies that had gained written informed consent and ethics approval. And all methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. No ethical permit is required for the secondary analysis of summary data. Therefore, the secondary analysis of the aggregated data does not require new approval from the Ethics Review Committee.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ya-Shi Zhou and Ju-Kun Song are contributed equally to this work.

Ju‑Xiang Peng is the more important contributor of the two corresponding authors. Jian‑Guo Liu is the second corresponding author.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, YS., Song, JK., Zheng, ZJ. et al. Heel bone mineral density and various oral diseases: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization. J Bone Miner Metab 41, 673–681 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-023-01443-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-023-01443-w

Keywords

Navigation