Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of osteoporosis using pelvic diagnostic computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to determine if a correlation exists between bone mineral density (BMD) obtained from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Hounsfield unit (HU) from pelvic diagnostic computed tomography (dCT), and to evaluate whether HU could be used to identify osteoporosis. Seventy-nine patients were included in this study. HU values were measured in three different sections: the head–neck junction of the femur, the middle portion of the femoral neck, and the intertrochanter of the femur (IT). In each sectional image, HU values were measured at two regions of interest: cortical and cancellous bone (HU_t) and cancellous bone. The correlation between BMD and HU_t of IT was significant (r = 0.839, p < 0.01). In IT, the area under the curve value of HU_t was 0.875 (0.796–0.955). We found that a HU_t of IT <170 can be regarded as indicating osteoporosis: its positive predictive value is 96.9 %. A HU_t of IT >210 can be regarded as indicating an absence of osteoporosis: its negative predictive value is 84.6 %. In conclusion, we found that a significant correlation between HU of pelvic dCT and BMD of DXA, and HU potentially provided an alternative method for determining regional BMD. Therefore, pelvic dCT could possibly be a supplementary method for initial diagnosis of osteoporosis and for initiation of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ 3rd, Thamer M, Ray NF, Chan JK, Chesnut CH 3rd, Einhorn TA, Johnston CC, Raisz LG, Silverman SL, Siris ES (1997) Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ 3rd (1997) Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:24–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Lu Y, Rummeny EJ (2004) In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 231:805–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Papadakis AE, Karantanas AH, Papadokostakis G, Damilakis J (2011) Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations. J Bone Miner Metab 29:352–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay WL, Chui CK, Ong SH, Ng AC (2012) Osteoporosis screening using areal bone mineral density estimation from diagnostic CT images. Acad Radiol 19:1273–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch GG, Landis JR, Freeman JL, Freeman DH Jr, Lehnen RC (1977) A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics 33:133–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Habashy AH, Yan X, Brown JK, Xiong X, Kaste SC (2011) Estimation of bone mineral density in children from diagnostic CT images: a comparison of methods with and without an internal calibration standard. Bone 48:1087–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mueller DK, Kutscherenko A, Bartel H, Vlassenbroek A, Ourednicek P, Erckenbrecht J (2011) Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation. Eur J Radiol 79:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, del Rio AM, Lauder T, Bruce RJ, Summers RM, Pooler BD, Binkley N (2011) Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res 26:2194–2203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG (2011) Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1057–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cann CE, Genant HK (1980) Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:493–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 341:72–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adams JE (2009) Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 71:415–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guglielmi G, Lang TF (2002) Quantitative computed tomography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:219–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Black DM, Bouxsein ML, Marshall LM, Cummings SR, Lang TF, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Nielson CM, Orwoll ES, G. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Research (2008) Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res 23:1326–1333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, Lu Y, Genant H, Yu A (2004) Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res 19:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riggs BL, Melton Iii LJ 3rd, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, Peterson JM, Rouleau PA, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Bouxsein ML, Khosla S (2004) Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 19:1945–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim Fat D, Kennedy J, Galvin R, O’Brien F, Mc Grath F, Mullett H (2012) The Hounsfield value for cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus—an in vitro study. Skeletal Radiol 41:557–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2013 No. 201300000000401).

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yee-Suk Kim.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, YS., Lee, S., Sung, YK. et al. Assessment of osteoporosis using pelvic diagnostic computed tomography. J Bone Miner Metab 34, 457–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0684-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0684-0

Keywords

Navigation