Skip to main content
Log in

The role of proficiency testing in the detection and resolution of calibration bias in the LeadCare® blood lead analyzer; limitations of peer-group assessment

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following implementation of the CLIA ‘88 laboratory regulations, the primary role of proficiency testing (external quality assessment, PT) in the U.S. has been widely viewed as one of assuring regulatory compliance. PT can also be an effective tool for detecting widespread analytical problems, subject to limitations based on the method of PT assigned value determination. A recent case study describes the role of two PT programs in detecting and resolving a calibration bias in the LeadCare blood lead analyzer, and illustrates the limitations of peer-group target determination in fulfilling that PT role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shannon M, Rifai N (1997) Ambul Child Health 3:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor L, Jones RL, Kwan L, Deddens JA, Ashley K, Sanderson WT (2001) Am J Ind Med 40:354–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parsons PJ (1992) Environ Res 57:149–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons PJ, Reilly AA, Esernio-Jenssen D, Werk LN, Mofenson HC, Stanton NV et al (2001) Clin Chem 47:322–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton NV (1993) J Int Fed Clin Chem 5:158–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,2005–2, 2005–3 Blood Lead Proficiency Test Event #2 and #3 (2005) http://www.wadsworth.org/testing/lead/ptresults.htm (Accessed December 2005)

  7. Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. National Blood Lead Proficiency Testing Program, June 2005 Data Summary [report] (2005) Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin

  8. Tietz NW, Rodgerson DO, Laessig RH (1992) Clin Chem 38:473–475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Büttner J (1995) Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rej R, Norton-Wenzel CS, Cao Z (2001) Clin Chem 47:2185–2186

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer-Toy DE, Wang E, Winter WE, Soldin SJ, Klee GG, Howanitz JH et al (2005) Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:305–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Contributions of the WI PT program were supported by grant H46MC00123 from the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Dept. of Health and Human Services. The authors also wish to acknowledge Dr. Eric Zink and Robb Morse of ESA for their efforts during the investigation, and for their helpful review of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel V. Stanton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanton, N.V., Fritsch, T., Geraghty, C. et al. The role of proficiency testing in the detection and resolution of calibration bias in the LeadCare® blood lead analyzer; limitations of peer-group assessment. Accred Qual Assur 11, 590–592 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0189-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0189-6

Keywords

Navigation