Skip to main content
Log in

Suspension culture process for H9N2 avian influenza virus (strain Re-2)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

H9N2 avian influenza virus has caused huge economic loss for the Chinese poultry industry since it was first identified. Vaccination is frequently used as a control method for the disease. Meanwhile suspension culture has become an important tool for the development of influenza vaccines. To optimize the suspension culture conditions for the avian influenza H9N2 virus (Re-2 strain) in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, we studied the culture conditions for cell growth and proliferation parameters for H9N2 virus replication. MDCK cells were successfully cultured in suspension, from a small scale to industrial levels of production, with passage time and initial cell density being optimized. The influence of pH on the culture process in the reactor has been discussed and the process parameters for industrial production were explored via amplification of the 650L reactor. Subsequently, we cultivated cells at high cell density and harvested high amounts of virus, reaching 10log2 (1:1024). Furthermore an animal experiment was conducted to detect antibody. Compared to the chicken embryo virus vaccine, virus cultured from MDCK suspension cells can produce a higher amount of antibodies. The suspension culture process is simple and cost efficient, thus providing a solid foundation for the realization of large-scale avian influenza vaccine production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tapia F, Vogel T, Genzel Y, Behrendt I, Hirschel M, Gangemi JD, Reichl U (2014) Production of high-titer human influenza A virus with adherent and suspension MDCK cells cultured in a single-use hollow fiber bioreactor. Vaccine 32(8):1003–1011. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.044 (Epub 2013/11/26)

  2. Bock A, Sann H, Schulze-Horsel J, Genzel Y, Reichl U, Mohler L (2009) Growth behavior of number distributed adherent MDCK cells for optimization in microcarrier cultures. Biotechnol Prog 25:1717–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottcher E, Freuer C, Steinmetzer T, Klenk HD, Garten W (2009) MDCK cells that express proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT provide a cell system to propagate influenza viruses in the absence of trypsin and to study cleavage of HA and its inhibition. Vaccine 27:6324–6329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peschel B, Frentzel S, Laske T, Genzel Y, Reichl U (2013) Comparison of influenza virus yields and apoptosis-induction in an adherent and a suspension MDCK cell line. Vaccine 31(48):5693–5699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Genzel Y, Olmer RM, Schafer B, Reichl U (2006) Wave microcarrier cultivation of MDCK cells for influenza virus production in serum containing and serum-free media. Vaccine 24:6074–6087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lohr V, Genzel Y, Behrendt I, Scharfenberg K, Reichl U (2010) A new MDCK suspension line cultivated in a fully defined medium in stirred-tank and wave bioreactor. Vaccine 28(38):6256–6264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang L, Changsom D, Lerdsamran H, Masamae W, Jongkaewwattana A, Iamsirithaworn S, Oota S, Louisirirotchanakul S, Auewarakul P, Puthavathana P (2016) Cross-reactive antibodies against H7N9 and H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Thai population. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol

  8. Shin D, Park KJ, Lee H, Cho EY, Kim MS, Hwang MH, Kim SI, Ahn DH (2015) Comparison of immunogenicity of cell-and egg-passaged viruses for manufacturing MDCK cell culture-based influenza vaccines. Virus Res 204:40–46

  9. Li LJ, Li Q, Shi XY, Zhao SJ, Zhang H, Shi CH (2000) Evaluation of neoplastigenesis of 5 types of passage animal cell lines in nude mice. J Fourth Military Med Univ 21(6) (ISSN: 81-5046/R)

  10. Please provide Ref. [10] as it missing in the list, but citation was provided

  11. Lohr V, Genzel Y, Behrendt I, Scharfenberg K, Reichl U (2010) A new MDCK suspension line cultivated in a fully defined medium in stirred-tank and wave bioreactor. Vaccine 28:6256–6264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang DL, Li LJ, Xia GT, He X, Gao B, Bai X, Huang G, Liu S, Yan L, de Fang F (2002) Experimental research on carcinogenesis or tumorigenicity of MDCK canine kidney cell (CKC) lines and analysis of their chromosome karyotypes. Sci Agric Sin 35(5) (ISSN: 0578-1752)

  13. Negrete A, Pai A, Shiloach J (2014) Use of hollow fiber tangential flow filtration for the recovery and concentration of HIV virus-like particles produced in insect cells. J Virol Methods 195:240–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JH, Shao M, Shi CH, Bi JL, Yin GF (2011) Reducing the side effects of FMD type O, Asia-1 inactivated vaccine by purification and concentration of antigen. Chin J Prevent Vet Med 33(1) (ISSN: 1008-0589)

  15. Sun Y, Liu J (2015) H9N2 influenza virus in China: a cause of concern. Protein Cell 6:18–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu YL, Dong YJ, Wang S (2015) Study on the reproduction and hemagglutination activity of H9N2 influenza virus in chicken embryo. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med 23:166–168 (ISSN: 1004-7034)

  17. Chen X, Zhang M, Zhang Q, Wang L, Wang D, Jiang T (2013) The construction and preliminary application of double-gene express vector that express Siat7e gene and St3 galIGene simultaneously Chin J Vet Drug (04) (ISSN: 1002-1280)

  18. Chu Chia, Lugovtsev Vladimir, Lewis Andrew, Betenbaugh Michael, Shiloach Joseph (2010) Production and antigenic properties of influenza virus from suspension MDCK-siat7e cells in a bench-scale bioreactor. Vaccine 28(44):7193–7201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wen Z, Wu C, Chen W, Zeng X, Shi J, Ge J, Chen H, Bu Z (2015) Establishment of MDCK stable cell lines expressing TMPRSS2 and MSPL and their applications in propagating influenza vaccine viruses in absence of exogenous trypsin. Biotechnol Res Int 2015:402628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Genzel Y, Dietzsch C, Rapp E, Schwarzer J, Reichl U (2010) MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88(2):461–475. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2742-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu KM, Smith GJ, Bahl J, Duan L, Tai H, Vijaykrishna D, Wang J, Zhang JX, Li KS, Fan XH, Webster RG, Chen H, Peiris JS, Guan Y (2007) The genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry from southern China, 2000–2005. J Virol 81:10389–10401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu C, Lugovtsev V, Golding H, Betenbaugh M, Shiloach J (2009) Conversion of MDCK cell line to suspension culture by transfecting with human siat7e gene and its application for influenza virus production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(35):14802–14807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Wielink R, Kant-Eenbergen H, Harmsen M, Martens D, Wijffels R, Coco-Martin J (2011) Adaptation of a Madin–Darby canine kidney cell line to suspension growth in serum-free media and comparison of its ability to produce avian influenza virus to Vero and BHK21 cell lines. J Virol Methods 171(1):53–60. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.09.029

  24. Grner A, Vorlop J (2002) Animal cells and processes for the replication of influenza viruses. Google Patents

  25. Pau M, Ophorst C, Koldijk MH, Schouten G, Mehtali M, Uytdehaag F (2001) The human cell line PER. C6 provides a new manufacturing system for the production of influenza vaccines. Vaccine 19(17):2716–2721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lohr V, Rath A, Genzel Y, Jordan I, Sandig V, Reichl U (2009) New avian suspension cell lines provide production of influenza virus and MVA in serum-free media: studies on growth, metabolism and virus propagation. Vaccine 27(36):4975–4982. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mehtali M, Champion-arnaud P, Leon A (2006) Process of manufacturing viral vaccines in suspension avian embryonic derived stem cell lines. WO Patent 2,006,108,846

  28. Genzel Y, Reichl U (2009) Continuous cell lines as a production system for influenza vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 8(12):1681–1692. doi:10.1586/erv.09.128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Genzel Y, Vogel T, Buck J, Behrendt I, Ramirez DV, Schiedner G et al (2014) High cell density cultivations by alternating tangential flow (ATF) perfusion for influenza A virus production using suspension cells. Vaccine

  30. Genzel Y, Behrendt I, Rödig J, Rapp E, Kueppers C, Kochanek S et al (2013) CAP, a new human suspension cell line for influenza virus production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(1):111–122. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4238-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Butler M, Burgener A, Patrick M, Berry M, Moffatt D, Huzel N et al (2000) Application of a serum-free medium for the growth of Vero cells and the production of reovirus. Biotechnol Prog 16(5):854–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fishbein DB, Yenne KM, Dreesen DW, Teplis CF, Mehta N, Briggs DJ (1993) Risk factors for systemic hypersensitivity reactions after booster vaccinations with human diploid cell rabies vaccine: a nationwide prospectivestudy. Vaccine 11(14):1390–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Henry O, Dormond E, Perrier M, Kamen A (2004) Insights into adenoviral vector production kinetics in acoustic filter-based perfusion cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 86(7):765–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pohlscheidt M, Langer U, Minuth T, Bödeker B, Apeler H, Hörlein H-D et al (2008) Development and optimization of a procedure for the production of <i> Parapoxvirus ovis by large-scale microcarrier cell culture in a non-animal, non-human and non-plant-derived medium. Vaccine 26(12):1552–1565. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful of Mr Zhaoyang Li, president of Shandong Sinder Technology Co., Ltd for experiment conditions and financially support. We also thanks the technical support and experimental help by the fellow Xiangxia Meng, Yuancang Zhu, Fumeng Wang and Zhiliang Liu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HLW and ZGL participated in the design of the study, performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. SYG and ZXS helped with the cell culture operation. XQX performed the statistical analysis. GCS conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guicai Song.

Ethics declarations

All experimental procedures have been reviewed and approved by local Animal Care and Use Committee of Shandong Sinder Technology Co., Ltd.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Funding

The study was financially supported by Shandong Sinder Technology Co., Ltd.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Guo, S., Li, Z. et al. Suspension culture process for H9N2 avian influenza virus (strain Re-2). Arch Virol 162, 3051–3059 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3460-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3460-8

Navigation