Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the streamflow sensitivity to aridity index between the Danjiangkou Reservoir basin and Miyun Reservoir basin, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The central route of China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project would divert water from the Danjiangkou Reservoir basin (DRB) to Beijing beginning in the year 2014. The current main surface water source for Beijing is the Miyun Reservoir basin (MRB). The observed streamflows into the DRB and the MRB decreased significantly due to climatic variation and human activities from 1960 to 2005. The climate elasticity method is widely used to quantitatively separate the impacts of climatic variation and human activities on streamflow. One of the uncertainties of the method is that the impacts of changes in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration on streamflow are separated with the assumption that they are independent. However, precipitation and potential evapotranspiration are not totally independent. Aridity index, as the ratio between potential evapotranspiration and precipitation, could be considered as the representative indicator of climatic variation. In this study, the sensitivity of streamflow to aridity index is evaluated to assess the impact of climatic variation on streamflow in the DRB and the MRB. The result shows that streamflow in the MRB is more sensitive to climatic variation than that in the DRB. However, the effective impact of aridity index on streamflow is the product of the sensitivity and the change rate of aridity index. The attribution results show that change in aridity index contributed 68.8 % of the decrease in streamflow in the DRB while it contributed 31.5 % of the decrease in streamflow in the MRB. This indicated that the impact of climatic variation was the main reason of decrease in streamflow in the DRB while human activities such as increasing water consumption and land use change were the main reasons of decreasing streamflow in the MRB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, 301 pp

  • Arora VK (2002) The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff. J Hydrol 265(1):164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko MI (1963) Evaporation under natural conditions. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaobai River Management Bureau of Beijing (2004) Flood and drought hazards of the Chaobai River. China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooge J, Bruen M, Parmentier B (1999) A simple model for estimating the sensitivity of runoff to long-term changes in precipitation without a change in vegetation. Adv Water Resour 23(2):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas E, Vogel R, Kroll C (2000) Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol 240(1):90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B (1981) On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface (in Chinese). Scientia Atmospherica Sinica 5(1):23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Xu C, Chen D, Halldin S, Chen YD (2006) Sensitivity of the Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. J Hydrol 329(3):620–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupet F, Vanclooster M (2001) Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 243(3):192–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immerzeel WW, Van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328(5984):1382–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M (1975) Rank correlation measures. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LJ, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang J, Yang JW, Jiang DJ, Li JY, Qin DY (2007) Assessing the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow from the Wuding River basin in China. Hydrol Process 21(25):3485–3491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Luo Y, Zhang D, Zhang M, Liu C (2011) Recent changes in pan-evaporation dynamics in China. Geophys Res Lett 38(13):L13404. doi:10.1029/2011GL047929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Liu C, Luo Y, Zhang M, Xia J (2012) Dramatic decrease in streamflow from the headwater source in the central route of China’s water diversion project: climatic variation or human influence? J Geophys Res 117:D06113. doi:10.1029/2011GL047929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (1974) A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evaporation. J Am Water Resour As 10(3):486–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P, Dunne K (2002) Macroscale water fluxes 2. Water and energy supply control of their interannual variability. Water Resour Res 38(10):1206. doi:10.1029/2001WR000760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kudzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Climate change: stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ol’dekop EM (1911) On evaporation from the surface of river basins in Russia. Trans Meteorol Obs Univ Tartu 4 Univ Tartu, Tartu

  • Pike J (1964) The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a tropical climate. J Hydrol 2(2):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Vickers A (2004) Boosting water productivity. Worldwatch Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond PA, Oh NH, Turner RE, Broussard W (2008) Anthropogenically enhanced fluxes of water and carbon from the Mississippi River. Nature 451(7177):449–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren XS (2007) Water resource assessment in the Hai River Basin. China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel RM, Limbrunner JF (2001) Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States. Water Resour Res 37(6):1771–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaake JC, Waggoner P (1990) From climate to flow, in Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomer MD, Schilling KE (2009) A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology. J Hydrol 376(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turc L (1953) Le bilan d’eau des sols: relations entre les précipitations, l’évaporation et l’écoulement. Ann Agron 5:491–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xia J, Chen J (2009) Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China. Water Resour Res 45(7):W00A11. doi:10.1029/2007WR006768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Pang J, Liu C, Li J (2009) Assessment of runoff and sediment yield in the Miyun Reservoir catchment by using SWAT model. Hydrol Process 23(25):3619–3630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Milliman JD, Xu H (2010) Temporal trend of precipitation and runoff in major Chinese Rivers since 1951. Global Planet Change 73(3–4):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YK, Schilling K (2006) Increasing streamflow and baseflow in Mississippi River since the 1940s: effect of land use change. J Hydrol 324(1):412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Dawes W, Walker G (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3):701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB428406) and the “Strategic Priority Research Program-Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Relevant Issues” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant No. XDA05090309). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhua Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Liu, W. & Xia, J. Comparison of the streamflow sensitivity to aridity index between the Danjiangkou Reservoir basin and Miyun Reservoir basin, China. Theor Appl Climatol 111, 683–691 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0701-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0701-3

Keywords

Navigation