Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traumatic brachial plexus injury: a study of 510 surgical cases from multicenter services in Guangxi, China

  • Original Article - Peripheral Nerves
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are severe lesions, and the incidence of these injuries has been increasing in recent years.

Methods

The clinical data of 510 operated patients with brachial plexus injury recruited from 74 hospitals in Guangxi from 2004 to 2016 were retrospectively studied.

Results

Our study included 447 males and 63 females, with an average age of 29.04 years. Traffic accidents were the most common cause of injury (64.71%), especially motorcycle accidents. Closed injuries accounted for 88.24% of cases, and 83.53% of patients had associated injuries, the most common of which were fractures (76.27%). The preoperative predictive value of root injury of MRI and CT was 74.71% and 71.28%, respectively. 44.71% of patients underwent an initial operation within 6 months after the trauma. Regarding the surgery, neurolysis alone, brachial plexus reconstruction, and free functioning gracilis graft accounted for 16.67%, 75.50%, and 4.51%, respectively. A total of 415 patients were followed up with an average time of 47.95 (25–68) months, and anxiety or depression were found among 81.20% of them. Two hundred seventy-six patients suffered from nerve pain, with mild pain present in 67.03% of patients. Additionally, 347 patients were followed up for more than 3 years, 76.81% of patients with C5-C6 injury recovery to useful function, and the procedure of neurolysis alone demonstrated the best efficacy (79.45%).

Conclusions

Brachial plexus injury is still a challenging trauma for surgeons, and traffic accidents are the dominant cause. Timely and effective surgery is important for functional limb recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BPI:

Brachial plexus injury

BP:

Brachial plexus

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

VAS:

Visual analog scale

LSUMC:

Louisiana State University Medical Center

NAP:

Nerve action potential

References

  1. Amrami KK, Port JD (2005) Imaging the brachial plexus. Hand Clin 21:25–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF (2006) Concepts of nerve regeneration and repair applied to brachial plexus reconstruction. Microsurgery 26:230–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brophy RH, Wolfe SW (2005) Planning brachial plexus surgery: treatment options and priorities. Hand Clin 21:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso DMM, Gepp R, Correa JF (2016) Outcome following phrenic nerve transfer to musculocutaneous nerve in patients with traumatic brachial palsy: a qualitative systematic review. Acta Neurochir 158:1793–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuang DC (2016) Debates to personal conclusion in peripheral nerve injury and reconstruction: a 30-year experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Indian J Plast Surg 49:144–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciaramitaro P, Padua L, Devigili G, Rota E, Tamburin S, Eleopra R, Cruccu G, Truini A, Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the Italian Neurological Society (2017) Prevalence of neuropathic pain in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury: a multicenter prospective hospital-based study. Pain Med 18:2428–2432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doi K, Otsuka K, Okamoto Y, Fujii H, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS (2002) Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography. J Neurosurg 96:277–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubuisson AS, Kline DG (2002) Brachial plexus injury: a survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single service. Neurosurgery 51:673–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emamhadi M, Alijani B, Andalib S (2016) Long-term clinical outcomes of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve in patients with brachial plexus palsy. Acta Neurochir 158:1801–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA (2011) The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair. J Neurosci 31:5325–5334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutmann E, Young JZ (1944) The re-innervation of muscle after various periods of atrophy. J Anat 78:15–43

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Harper CM (2005) Preoperative and intraoperative electrophysiologic assessment of brachial plexus injuries. Hand Clin 21:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hems TE (2015) Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur 40:568–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoang D, Chen VW, Seruya M (2018) Recovery of elbow flexion after nerve reconstruction versus free functional muscle transfer for late, traumatic brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:949–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain DK, Bhardwaj P, Venkataramani H, Sabapathy SR (2012) An epidemiological study of traumatic brachial plexus injury patients treated at an Indian centre. Indian J Plast Surg 45:498–503

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kakinoki R, Ikeguchi R, Dunkan SF, Nakayama K, Matsumoto T, Ohta S, Nakamura T (2010) Comparison between partial ulnar and intercostal nerve transfers for reconstructing elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 5:4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kato N, Htut M, Taggart M, Carlstedt T, Birch R (2006) The effects of operative delay on the relief of neuropathic pain after injury to the brachial plexus: a review of 148 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:756–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kline DG, Happel LT (1993) Penfield lecture. A quarter century’s experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci 20:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Limthongthang R, Bachoura A, Songcharoen P, Osterman AL (2013) Adult brachial plexus injury: evaluation and management. Orthop Clin N Am 44:591–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y, Lao J, Zhao X (2015) Comparative study of phrenic and intercostal nerve transfers for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury. Injury 46:671–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magalon G, Bordeaux J, Legre R, Aubert JP (1988) Emergency versus delayed repair of severe brachial plexus injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res:32–35

  22. Martin E, Senders J, DiRisio A, Smith T, Broekman M (2018) Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mathews AL, Yang G, Chang KW, Chung KC (2017) A systematic review of outcomes of contralateral C-7 transfer for the treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injury: an international comparison. J Neurosurg 126:922–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta VS, Banerji AK, Tripathi RP (1993) Surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Br J Neurosurg 7:491–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Narakas AO (1993) Lesions found when operating traction injuries of the brachial plexus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 95:S56–S64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasulic L, Savic A, Zivkovic B, Vitosevic F, Micovic M, Bascarevic V, Puzovic V, Novakovic N, Lepic M, Samardzic M, Mandic-Rajcevic S (2017) Outcome after brachial plexus injury surgery and impact on quality of life. Acta Neurochir 159:1257–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rasulic L, Savic A, Lepic M, Puzovic V, Karaleic S, Kovacevic V, Vitosevic F, Samardzic M (2018) Epidemiological characteristics of surgically treated civilian traumatic brachial plexus injuries in Serbia. Acta Neurochir 160:1837–1845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Samii M, Bear-Henney S, Ludemann W, Tatagiba M, Blomer U (2001) Treatment of refractory pain after brachial plexus avulsion with dorsal root entry zone lesions. Neurosurgery 48:1269–1275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sammer DM, Kircher MF, Bishop AT, Spinner RJ, Shin AY (2012) Hemi-contralateral C7 transfer in traumatic brachial plexus injuries: outcomes and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:131–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stone L, Keenan MA (1988) Peripheral nerve injuries in the adult with traumatic brain injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res:136–144

  31. Sulaiman OA, Gordon T (2009) Role of chronic Schwann cell denervation in poor functional recovery after nerve injuries and experimental strategies to combat it. Neurosurgery 65:A105–A114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Terzis JK, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN (1999) Outcomes of brachial plexus reconstruction in 204 patients with devastating paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1221–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by funds from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (2015GXNSFCA1598011-5) and by the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery (17DZ2270500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Sha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Ethical Review Committee, 2018 (KY-E-047).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Comments

The authors report an impressive series of 510 patients with brachial plexus injuries operated on over a period of 12 years. The authors were able to collect follow-up data on 415 patients followed for more than two years. The authors use a number of techniques to repair the brachial plexus. A minority of patients could be treated with simple neurolysis. The majority of patients had either nerve grafts or nerve transfers. A few patients had tendon transfers. Their technical results were very impressive. It should be noted that despite the excellent technical results, 2/3 of the patients reported persistent pain and more than 80% of the patients reported persistent anxiety and depression. These findings indicate that despite surgical advances, we have a long way to go in treating patients with significant brachial plexus injuries.

Allan Friedman

NC, USA

An interesting epidemiological study of hospital admitted and treated brachial plexus injuries in China.

Michel Kliot

CA, USA

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Peripheral Nerves

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, GY., Xue, MQ., Wang, JW. et al. Traumatic brachial plexus injury: a study of 510 surgical cases from multicenter services in Guangxi, China. Acta Neurochir 161, 899–906 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03871-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03871-y

Keywords

Navigation