Abstract
Background
Abnormal muscle response (AMR) has been considered as a predictor of the prognosis after microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS). However, its predictive value has not always been satisfactory. The objective of this work was to confirm an optimal range of stimulus intensities to elicit AMR in surgery.
Methods
Seventy-two consecutive patients with primary HFS treated by MVD were retrospectively included in this study. A wide range of stimulus intensities from 1 to 100 mA was applied in AMR monitoring. The AMR-elicited threshold value was quantitatively traced throughout all surgical procedures. The relationship between clinical outcomes and electrophysiological findings was analyzed.
Results
Of the 72 patients, 44 were immediately cured and 24 were delayed cured; the remaining 4 were proved not to be cured in their follow-up periods. The patterns of AMR-elicited threshold changes were categorized into five types, which could only be discriminated with a wide range of stimulus intensities. The constituent ratio of the patterns was significantly different (P < 0.001) among the clinical outcomes.
Conclusions
Some patterns of AMR changes might have been ignored if we had only applied a narrow range of stimulus intensities (1–30 mA) to judge whether AMR disappeared or not. Thus, a wide range of stimulus intensities (1–100 mA) to trace the AMR-elicited threshold values was proposed for a more precise prediction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Digre K, Corbett JJ (1988) Hemifacial spasm: differential diagnosis, mechanism, and treatment. Adv Neurol 49:151–176
Fukuda M, Oishi M, Takao T, Hiraishi T, Sato Y, Fujii Y (2012) Monitoring of abnormal muscle response and facial motor evoked potential during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Surg Neurol Int 3:118
Gardner WJ (1962) Concerning the mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 19:947–958
Hatem J, Sindou M, Vial C (2001) Intraoperative monitoring of facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Prognostic value for long-term outcome: a study in a 33-patient series. Br J Neurosurg 15:496–499
Hirono S, Yamakami I, Sato M, Kado K, Fukuda K, Nakamura T, Higuchi Y, Saeki N (2014) Continuous intraoperative monitoring of abnormal muscle response in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm; a real-time navigator for complete relief. Neurosurg Rev 37:311–320
Ishikawa M, Nakanishi T, Takamiya Y, Namiki J (2001) Delayed resolution of residual hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression operations. Neurosurgery 49:847–856
Jannetta PJ (1975) The cause of hemifacial spasm: definitive microsurgical treatment at the brainstem in 31 patients. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 80:319–322
Joo WI, Lee KJ, Park HK, Chough CK, Rha HK (2008) Prognostic value of intra-operative lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm. J Clin Neurosci 15:1335–1339
Kemp LW, Reich SG (2004) Hemifacial spasm. Curr Treat Options Neurol 6:175–179
Kitai ST, Tanaka T, Tsukahara N, Yu H (1972) The facial nucleus of cat: antidromic and synaptic activation and peripheral nerve representation. Exp Brain Res 16:161–183
Kiya N, Bannur U, Yamauchi A, Yoshida K, Kato Y, Kanno T (2001) Monitoring of facial evoked EMG for hemifacial spasm: a critical analysis of its prognostic value. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:365–368
Li S, Hong W, Tang Y, Ying T, Zhang W, Li X, Zhu J, Zhong J, Hua X, Xu S, Wan L, Wang X, Yang M, Li Y, Zheng X (2010) Re-operation for persistent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression with the aid of intraoperative monitoring of abnormal muscle response. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:2113–2118
Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1984) On the origin of synkinesis in hemifacial spasm: results of intracranial recordings. J Neurosurg 61:569–576
Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Hemifacial spasm: results of electrophysiologic recording during microvascular decompression operations. Neurology 35:969–974
Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electrophysiological observations. Neurosurgery 16:612–618
Mooij JJ, Mustafa MK, van Weerden TW (2001) Hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electromyographic monitoring as a guide for microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 49:1365–1371
Møller AR (2011) Generation of electrical activity in the nervous system and muscles. In: Møller AR (ed) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 23–41
Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1987) Monitoring facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression operations for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 66:681–685
Neves DO, Lefaucheur JP, de Andrade DC, Hattou M, Ahdab R, Ayache SS, Le GC, Keravel Y (2009) A reappraisal of the value of lateral spread response monitoring in the treatment of hemifacial spasm by microvascular decompression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1375–1380
Nielsen VK (1984) Pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm: I. Ephaptic transmission and ectopic excitation. Neurology 34:418–426
Ogawara K, Kuwabara S, Kamitsukasa I, Mizobuchi K, Misawa S, Hattori T (2004) Trigeminal afferent input alters the excitability of facial motoneurons in hemifacial spasm. Neurology 62:1749–1752
Sekula RF Jr, Bhatia S, Frederickson AM, Jannetta PJ, Quigley MR, Small GA, Breisinger R (2009) Utility of intraoperative electromyography in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 27:E10
Sindou MP (2005) Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:1019–1026
Tobishima H, Hatayama T, Ohkuma H (2014) Relation between the persistence of an abnormal muscle response and the long-term clinical course after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54:474–482
Wang A, Jankovic J (1998) Hemifacial spasm: clinical findings and treatment. Muscle Nerve 21:1740–1747
Wilkinson MF, Kaufmann AM (2005) Monitoring of facial muscle motor evoked potentials during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: evidence of changes in motor neuron excitability. J Neurosurg 103:64–69
Yamashita S, Kawaguchi T, Fukuda M, Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Kameyama S (2005) Abnormal muscle response monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:933–937
Yang M, Zheng X, Ying T, Zhu J, Zhang W, Yang X, Li S (2014) Combined intraoperative monitoring of abnormal muscle response and Z-L response for hemifacial spasm with tandem compression type. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:1161–1166
Ying TT, Li ST, Zhong J, Li XY, Wang XH, Zhu J (2011) The value of abnormal muscle response monitoring during microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm. Int J Surg 9:347–351
Zhong J, Xia L, Dou NN, Ying TT, Zhu J, Liu MX, Li ST (2015) Delayed relief of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression: can it be avoided. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157:93–99
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Graduate Students Innovation Foundation of Peking Union Medical College (grant no. 2015-1002-02-25).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical approval
This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, G., Zhang, L., Ren, H. et al. What range of stimulus intensities should we apply to elicit abnormal muscle response in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm?. Acta Neurochir 159, 251–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2999-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2999-6