Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of indocyanine green fluorescent angiography to digital subtraction angiography in brain arteriovenous malformation surgery

  • Clinical Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The potential utility of intraoperative microscope-integrated indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography in the surgery of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and evaluation of the completeness of resection is debatable. Postoperative catheter angiography is considered the gold standard. We evaluated the value of ICG and intraoperative catheter angiography in this setting.

Methods

Between January 2009 and July 2013, 37 patients with brain AVMs underwent surgical resection of their vascular lesions. ICG videoangiography and an intraoperative catheter angiography were performed in 32 cases, and a routine postoperative angiogram was performed within 48 h to 2 weeks after surgery. The usefulness of ICG findings and the ability to confirm total resection and to identify residual nidus or persistent shunt were assessed and compared to intraoperative and postoperative digital subtraction angiography, respectively.

Results

There were 7 grade 1, 11 grade 2, 11 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 Spetzler-Martin classification AVMs. ICG angiography helped to distinguish AVM vessels in 26 patients. In 31 patients, it demonstrated that there was no residual shunting. In one patient, a residual AVM was identified and further resected. Intraoperative catheter angiography detected two additional small residuals that were missed by ICG angiography, both deep in the surgical cavity. Further resection of the AVM was performed, and total resection was confirmed by a repeat intraoperative angiogram. Postoperative angiography in a patient with a grade 4 lesion revealed one additional small deep residual AVM nidus with persistent late shunting missed on both ICG and intraoperative angiography. Overall ICG angiography missed three out of four residual AVMs after initial resection, while the intraoperative angiogram missed one.

Conclusion

Although ICG angiography is a helpful adjunct in the surgery of some brain AVMs, it’s yield in detecting residual AVM nidus or shunt is low, especially for deep-seated lesions and higher grade AVMs. ICG angiography should not be used as a sole and/or reliable technique. High-resolution postoperative angiography must be performed in brain AVM surgery and remains the best test to confidently confirm complete AVM resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Patila T, Spillmann T, Tuchin VV, Venermo M, Välisuo P (2012) A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging 2012:940585

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anegawa S, Hayashi T, Torigoe R, Harada K, Kihara S (1994) Intraoperative angiography in the resection of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 80:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balamurugan S, Agrawal A, Kato Y, Sano H (2011) Intra operative indocyanine green video-angiography in cerebrovascular surgery: an overview with review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 6:88–93

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrow DL, Boyer KL, Joseph GJ (1992) Intraoperative angiography in the management of neurovascular disorders. Neurosurgery 30:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer BL (1984) Intraoperative angiography in cerebral aneurysm and AV-malformation. Neurosurg Rev 7:209–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dashti R, Laakso A, Niemela M, Porras M, Hernesniemi J (2009) Microscope-integrated near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during surgery of intracranial aneurysms: the Helsinki experience. Surg Neurol 71:543–550, discussion 550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dehdashti AR, Thines L, Da Costa LB, terBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC, Tymianski M (2009) Intraoperative biplanar rotational angiography during neurovascular surgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 111:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Faber F, Thon N, Fesl G, Rachinger W, Guckler R, Tonn JC, Schichor C (2011) Enhanced analysis of intracerebral arterioveneous malformations by the intraoperative use of analytical indocyanine green videoangiography: technical note. Acta Neurochir 153:2181–2187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feindel W, Yamamoto YL, Hodge CP (1967) Intracarotid fluorescein angiography: a new method for examination of the epicerebral circulation in man. Can Med Assoc J 96:1–7

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh S, Levy ML, Stanley P, Nelson M, Giannotta SL, McComb JG (1999) Intraoperative angiography in the management of pediatric vascular disorders. Pediatr Neurosurg 30:16–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanggi D, Etminan N, Steiger HJ (2010) The impact of microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography on surgery of arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery 67:1094–1103, discussion 1103–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Killory BD, Nakaji P, Gonzales LF, Ponce FA, Wait SD, Spetzler RF (2009) Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green angiography during cerebral arteriovenous malformation surgery. Neurosurgery 65:456–462, discussion 462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng YP, King NK, Wan KR, Wang E, Ng I (2013) Uses and limitations of indocyanine green videoangiography for flow analysis in arteriovenous malformation surgery. J Clin Neurosci 20:224–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raabe A, Nakaji P, Beck J, Kim LJ, Hsu FP, Kamerman JD, Seifert V, Spetzler RF (2005) Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 103:982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Solomon RA, Connolly ES Jr, Prestigiacomo CJ, Khandji AG, Pile-Spellman J (2000) Management of residual dysplastic vessels after cerebral arteriovenous malformation resection: implications for postoperative angiography. Neurosurgery 46:1052–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taddei G, Tommasi CD, Ricci A, Galzio RJ (2011) Arteriovenous malformations and intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography: preliminary experience. Neurol India 59:97–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takagi Y, Kikuta K, Nozaki K, Sawamura K, Hashimoto N (2007) Detection of a residual nidus by surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography in a child with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosurg 107:416–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaidi HA, Abla AA, Nakaji P, Chowdhry SA, Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF (2014) Indocyanine green angiography in the surgical management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: lessons learned in 130 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 2):246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Bilbao.

Additional information

Clinical Trial IRB no. 2013–0455

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilbao, C.J., Bhalla, T., Dalal, S. et al. Comparison of indocyanine green fluorescent angiography to digital subtraction angiography in brain arteriovenous malformation surgery. Acta Neurochir 157, 351–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2287-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2287-2

Keywords

Navigation