Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative portable CT-scanner based spinal navigation - a feasibility and safety study

  • Clinical Article - Spine
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Navigation based on an intraoperative CT scan is not a new approach to spinal instrumentation. Innovative intraoperative imaging technology, however, opens new horizons to more precise image acquisition as well as to further workflow. Planning of screw entry-points and trajectories in this study had been based on intraoperative imaging obtained by a portable 32-slice CT scanner. This prospective study evaluates feasibility, accuracy, and safety of this novel approach in an initial series of 85 surgeries.

Method

Medical records and radiological materials of 82 patients who underwent the first 85 consecutive stabilisations were analysed. Incorrect screw position, medical and technical complications as well as availability of this procedure in particular spinal levels were the subject of evaluation.

Results

Out of 571 implants inserted in all spinal levels, only five screws (0.87 %) did not meet the criteria for correct implant position. These screw misplacements had not been complicated by neural, vascular or visceral injury and the surgeon was not forced to change the position intraoperatively or during the postoperative period. The quality of intraoperative CT imaging sufficient for navigation was obtained at all spinal segments regardless of a patient’s habitus or positioning or comorbidity.

Conclusion

Intraoperative portable CT scanner-based navigation seems to be an effective way of doing spinal instrumentation guidance. High precision of implant insertion confirms the preconditions of navigation usage during more complex surgeries at any level of the spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

computed tomography

LED:

light emitting diode

3D:

three-dimensional

CTDI:

computed tomography dose index

DLP:

dose length product

References

  1. Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Smith LR, Spetzler RF (1995) Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 83:197–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ (2006) Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol 253:1123–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nolte LP, Zamorano LJ, Jiang Z, Wang Q, Langlotz F, Berlemann U (1995) Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws. A laboratory set-up Spine 20:497–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomized controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waschke A, Walter J, Duenisch P, Reichart R, Kalff R, Ewald C (2013) CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws. Eur Spine J 22:654–660

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan Chiang CY, Tsai TT, Chen LH, Lai PL, Fu TS, Niu CC, Chen WJ (2012) Computed tomography-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Chang Gung Med J 35:332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steudel WI, Nabhan A, Shariat K (2011) Intraoperative CT in spine surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Suppl 109:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonn JC, Schichor C, Schnell O, Zausinger S, Uhl E, Morhard D, Reiser M (2011) Intraoperative computer tomography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Suppl 109:163–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Costa F, Cardia A, Ortolina A, Fabio G, Zerbi A, Fornari M (2011) Spinal navigation: standard preoperative versus intraoperative computed tomography data set acquisition for computer-guidance system: radiological and clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Spine 36:2094–2098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N, Binaghi S, Schizas C (2007) Observer reliability in evaluating pedicle screw placement using computed tomography. Int Orthop 31:531–536

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser J, von Jako R, Carrino J, Härtl R (2008) Electromagnetic navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery: results of a cadaveric study to evaluate percutaneous pedicle screw insertion. SAS J 2:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. von Jako R, Finn MA, Yonemura KS, Araghi A, Khoo LT, Perez-Cruet M (2011) Minimally invasive percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation: increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure by means of a novel electromagnetic navigation system. Acta Nerochir (Wien) 153:589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasso RC, Garrido BJ (2007) Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Papadopoulos EC, Girardi FP, Sama A, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP Jr (2005) Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery. Spine J 5:263–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandela JR, Jacob RP, Arreola M, Griglock TM, Bova F, Yang M (2013) Use of CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients. World Neurosurg 79:390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ringel F, Villard J, Ryang YM, Meyer B (2014) Navigation, robotics and intraoperative imaging in spinal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 41:3–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Barsa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barsa, P., Frőhlich, R., Beneš, V. et al. Intraoperative portable CT-scanner based spinal navigation - a feasibility and safety study. Acta Neurochir 156, 1807–1812 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2184-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2184-8

Keywords

Navigation