Skip to main content
Log in

Proper information during the surgical decision-making process lowers the anxiety of patients with high-grade gliomas

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aim to analyse the relationship between the quality of information during the decision-making process regarding surgery to treat high-grade gliomas and the level of anxiety of the patients.

Methods

This is a transversal, descriptive and correlational study on 26 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of high-grade glioma. They scored the quality (in terms of comprehension and satisfaction) of information received about the treatment options and prognosis during the surgical decision-making process, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS) was applied immediately afterward.

Results

Lower levels of anxiety were observed in patients who showed a desire to receive information regarding their illness, those with a higher degree of comprehension, and those with a higher level of satisfaction with the information provided.

Conclusions

An improvement in the communication process contributes to a decrease in the levels of anxiety, and consequently to enhancement of the well-being of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arranz P, Cancio H (2000) Counselling: Habilidades de información y comunicación con el paciente oncológico. In: Gil F (ed) Manual de Psicooncología. Nova Sidonia, Madrid, pp 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baile WF, Lenzi R, Kudelka AP, Maguire P, Novack D, Goldstein M et al (1997) Improving physician-patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists. J Cancer Educ 12:166–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barreto MP (2003) Palliative care. In: Fernández Ballesteros R (ed) The encyclopedia of psychological assessment, vol 2. Sage, London, pp 671–674

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bayés R (2001) Psicología del sufrimiento y de la muerte. Martínez Roca, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayés R, Arranz P, Barbero J, Barreto MP (1996) Propuesta de un modelo integral para una intervención terapéutica paliativa. Med Paliat 3:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centeno C, Núñez-Olarte M (1994) Questioning diagnosis disclosure in terminal cancer patients: a prospective study evaluating patients responses. Palliat Med 9:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Derdiarian A (1987) Information needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients: a theoretical framework. Cancer Nurs 10:107–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Derogatis LR, Morrow GR, Fetting J, Penman D, Piasetsky S, Schmale AM et al (1983) The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA 249:751–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (2004) Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 363:312–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faulkner A, Maguire P (1994) Talking to cancer patients and their relatives. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griggs JJ, Sorbero ME, Mallinger JB, Quinn M, Waterman M, Brooks B et al (2007) Vitality, mental health, and satisfaction with information after breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 66:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 14:831–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinds C, Streater A, Mood D (1995) Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy. perceptions of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 18:374–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland JC (1996) Cancer’s psychological challenges. Sci Am 275:158–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F et al (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 103:1494–1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Gilmour WH, Atkinson JM, Barrett A, Cawsey AJ, McEwen J (1999) Cross sectional survey of patients’ satisfaction with information about cancer. Br Med J 319:1247–1248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Nakano T, Mikami I, Okamura H et al (2000) Prevalence, predictive factors, and screening for psychologic distress in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. Cancer 88:2817–2823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis C, Nelson EC, Nelson E, Kessler RC et al (1996) Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med 125:640–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mainio A, Hakko H, Niemela A, Tuurinkoski T, Koivukangas J, Rasanen P (2003) The effect of brain tumour laterality on anxiety levels among neurosurgical patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1278–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesters I, van den B, DeBoer M, Pruyn J (2001) Measuring information needs among cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 43:253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mills M, Sullivan K (1999) The importance of information giving patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 8:631–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozmovits L, Ziebland S (2004) What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns 53:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Salminen E, Vire J, Poussa T, Knifsund S (2004) Unmet needs in information flow between breast cancer patients, their spouses, and physicians. Support Care Cancer 12:663–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Santoso JT, Engle DB, Schaffer L, Wan JY (2006) Cancer diagnosis and treatment: communication accuracy between patients and their physicians. Cancer J 12:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seligman ME (1975) Helplessness. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skarstein J, Aass N, Fosså SD, Skovlund E, Dahl AA (2000) Anxiety and depression in cancer patients: relation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 49:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sutherland H, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lockwood G, Trickler D (1989) Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med 82:260–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tagay S, Herpertz S, Langkafel M, Erim Y, Bockisch A, Senf W et al (2006) Health-related Quality of Life, depression and anxiety in thyroid cancer patients. Qual Life Res 15:695–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulla S, Arranz P, Del Rincón C, Coca C, Ramos JL, Remor E (2001) Necesidades y recursos de enfermos hemato-oncológicos ingresados en un hospital general. Oncología 24:253–264

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van’t Spijker A, Trijsburg RW, Duivenvoorden HJ (1997) Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: a metaanalytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med 59:280–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wellisch DK, Kaleita TA, Freeman D, Cloughesv T, Goldman J (2002) Predicting major depression in brain tumor patients. Psychooncology 11:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a grant by the Fundación Grifols I Lucas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan A. Barcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Díaz, J.L., Barreto, P., Gallego, J.M. et al. Proper information during the surgical decision-making process lowers the anxiety of patients with high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurochir 151, 357–362 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0195-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0195-7

Keywords

Navigation