Skip to main content
Log in

An expanded phylogeny of Cuphea (Lythraceae) and a North American monophyly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A phylogenetic analysis of the New World genus Cuphea was conducted employing sequences from the nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and chloroplast trnL-trnF spacer and rpl16 intron. The analysis expands the number of Cuphea species from 53 in an earlier ITS study to 70 and adds two chloroplast data sets in order to generate a more complete and robust phylogeny and to test a previous result that suggested the presence of a large North American clade. Results reaffirm the monophyly of Cuphea with Pleurophora as the sister genus and recover a basal divergence event that mirrors the two subgenera of the current classification. Phylogenies of the two chloroplast regions are largely unresolved beyond the initial dichotomy and some resolution at the terminal and subterminal nodes. Based on the ITS phylogeny, five major clades are recognized. Subgenus Cuphea (Clade 1), defined morphologically by the synapomorphic loss of bracteoles, is sister to the much larger subg. Bracteolatae (Clades 2–5). Clades 2–4, comprising the South American and Caribbean species, grade successively to Clade 5, an exclusively North American lineage of 29 species. Among the 12 sections included in the study, only section Trispermum, a subclade of Clade 4, is monophyletic. Section Pseudocircaea is nested within Clade 3, which is largely equivalent to section Euandra. The North American endemic clade includes four sections, of which none are recovered as monophyletic in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber JC, Hames KA, Cialdella AM, Giussani LM (2009) Phylogenetic relationships of Piptochaetium Presl (Poaceae: Stipeae) and related genera reconstructed from nuclear and chloroplast sequence datasets. Taxon 58:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1988) Revision of Cuphea section Heterodon (Lythraceae). Syst Bot Monogr 20:1–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1989a) Cuphea: a new plant source of medium-chain fatty acids. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 28:139–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1989b) Revision of Cuphea sect. Leptocalyx (Lythraceae). Syst Bot 14:43–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1990) New species of Cuphea section Melvilla (Lythraceae) and an annotated key to the section. Brittonia 42:12–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1998a) Revision of Cuphea section Diploptychia (Lythraceae). Syst Bot Monogr 53:1–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (1998b) Relacionamentos entre as espécies autógamas de Cuphea P. Browne seção Brachyandra Koehne (Lythraceae). Acta Bot Bras 12:203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA (2010) The genus Cuphea (Lythraceae)—diversification on two continents. 60° Congresso Nacional de Botânica, Feira de Santana, BA, Brasil (in press)

  • Graham SA, Cavalcanti TB (2001) New chromosome counts in the Lythraceae and a review of chromosome numbers in the family. Syst Bot 26:445–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, Graham SA (1971) Palynology and systematics of Cuphea. II. Pollen morphology and infrageneric classification. Am J Bot 58:844–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, Nowicke J, Skvarla J, Graham S, Patel G, Lee S (1985) Palynology and systematics of the Lythraceae. I. Genera Adenaria-Ginoria. Am J Bot 72:1012–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA, Crisci JV, Hoch PC (1993) Cladistic analysis of the Lythraceae sensu lato based on morphological characters. Bot J Linn Soc 113:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA, Hall J, Sytsma K, Shi SH (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of the Lythraceae based on four gene regions and morphology. Int J Plant Sci 166:995–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA, Freudenstein JV, Luker M (2006) A phylogenetic study of Cuphea (Lythraceae) based on morphology and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Sys Bot 31:764–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH (1998 and updates) Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/. Accessed 20 Nov 2009

  • Koehne E (1903) Lythraceae. In: Engler A (ed) Das Pflanzenreich IV. 216. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourteig A (1986) Revisión de dos secciones del genero Cuphea P. Browne (Lythraceae). Phytologia 60:17–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourteig A (1987) Lythraceae austroamericanae. Addenda et corrigenda II. Sellowia 39:5–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Buckley TR (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53:793–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland, OR, p 479

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambault A (2007) Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/. Accessed 20 Nov 2009

  • Raven PH (1972) Why are bird-visited flowers predominantly red? Evol 26:674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seelanan T, Brubaker CL, Stewart JM, Craven LA, Wendel JF (1999) Molecular systematics of Australian Gossypium section Grandicalyx (Malvaceae). Syst Bot 24:183–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J, Small RL (2004) Addressing the “hardest puzzle in American pomology:” phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. Am J Bot 91:985–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu W, Miller J, Siripun KC, Winder CT, Schilling EE, Small RL (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot 92:142–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ (1998) Molecular systematics of plants II DNA Sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 574

  • Stubbs JM, Slabas AR (1982) Ultrastructural and biochemical characterization of the epidermal hairs of the seeds of Cuphea procumbens. Planta 155:392–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl Mol Biol 17:1105–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weberling F (1988) The architecture of inflorescences in the Myrtales. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 75:226–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (DEB-0608248) to AGG and JCB. Aaron Rodríguez provided material of selected species from Mexico for the study, and Taciana Cavalcanti, Shirley Graham and Glocimar Pereira da Silva contributed material of the Brazilian species. The authors thank the reviewers for constructive comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet C. Barber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber, J.C., Ghebretinsae, A. & Graham, S.A. An expanded phylogeny of Cuphea (Lythraceae) and a North American monophyly. Plant Syst Evol 289, 35–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0329-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0329-7

Keywords

Navigation