Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New Method for Shear Strength Determination of Unfilled, Unweathered Rock Joint

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Replicas were produced of 20 natural rock joints with different roughness. Factors affecting shear strength were examined and direct shear tests were performed using the replica joints to determine their quantitative shear strength characteristics. Results from the shear tests were best fitted by the power law equation, τ =  Bn , where τ is the shear strength and σ n is the normal stress, and regression coefficients A and B were determined. The coefficient A (equal to τ when σ n is 1 MPa) is defined as the friction angle, and B, which determines the curvature of the plot of shear versus normal strength, is a factor that reduces the shear strength. The physical and mechanical properties of the coefficients A and B were defined, and the relationship between these coefficients and the factors affecting shear strength, such as roughness and joint wall strength, were analyzed quantitatively. A new equation, τ = σ Bn tan[ϕ b ϕ J s n], was suggested to measure and predict shear strength accurately based on results from these analyses, where ϕ b is the basic friction angle, ϕ J is the joint roughness angle, and s n is the shear component. Although the new shear strength equation is nonlinear, it is as simple to use as a linear equation and the shear strength can be estimated using only three easily measurable parameters (ϕ b , ϕ J , and σ j , the joint wall compressive strength). The failure envelope estimated using the new shear strength equation not only closely matches the measured shear strength, but also reflects the nonlinear relationship between the normal stress and shear strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ n :

Effective normal stress

τ :

Shear stress

c :

Cohesion

S j :

Apparent cohesion

ϕ :

Friction angle

ϕ b , ϕ B :

Basic friction angle

ϕ r :

Residual friction angle

i :

Dilation angle

d n :

Dilation components

s n :

Shear component

JRC:

Joint roughness coefficient

JCS:

Joint compressive strength

SRP:

Stationary roughness parameter

I :

Non-stationary angle

a, c, d :

Empirical coefficients

Δϕ :

Joint roughness angle

P N :

Median angle pressure

ϕ m :

Friction component

ψ :

Dilation component

σ T :

Shear strength of intact rock material

\(\theta^{*}_{\text{max} }\) :

Maximum apparent gradient of asperities

C :

Roughness parameter

A 0 :

Maximum possible contact area

UCS:

Uniaxial compressive strength

E :

Young’s modulus

ν :

Poisson’s ratio

Z 2 :

Root mean square first derivative values

Z +2 :

Z 2 which analyzes only the positive gradient to shearing direction

Z 2s :

Three-dimensional equivalent of Z 2

R p :

Roughness profile indexes

R s :

Surface roughness coefficient

A t :

Actual area of surface of the joint

A n :

Nominal area of surface of the joint

D :

Fractal dimension of joint

D s :

3-D fractal dimension of joint

A, B :

Regression coefficient of Power law equation

ϕ J :

Joint roughness angle

ϕ A :

Friction angle when normal stress is 1 MPa

References

  • Alejano LR, Gonzalez J, Muralha J (2012) Comparison of different techniques of tilt testing and basic friction angle variability assessment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:1023–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13:255–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belem T, Homana-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33(4):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce IG, Cruden DM, Eaton TM (1989) Use of a tilting table to determine the basic friction angle of hard rock samples. Can Geotech J 26:474–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee JD (1967) Frictional characteristics of granite under high confining pressure. J Geophys Res 72:3639–3648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell B (2009) Updates to the GG-shear strength criterion. Dissertation, University of Toronto

  • Cox BL, Wang JSY (1993) Fractal surfaces: measurement and applications in the earth sciences. Fractals 1:87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Hu XQ (1988) Basic friction angles of carbonate rocks from Kananaskis country, Canada. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 38(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denby B, Scoble MJ (1984) Quantification of power law indices for discontinuity shear strength prediction. In: Proceedings 25th US symposium on rock mechanics. USRMS, Evanston, pp 475–482

  • Fardin N, Jing L, Stephansson O (2001) Heterogeneity and anisotropy of roughness of rock joints. In: Sarkka P, Eloranta P (eds) Proceedings of the ISRM regional symposium, EUROCK 2001. Balkema, Espoo, pp 223–227

  • Goldstein M, Goosev B, Pyrogovsky N, Tulinov R, Turovskaya A (1966) Investigation of mechanical properties of cracked rock. In: Proceedings 1st congress ISRM. ISRM, Lisbon, pp 521–524

  • Grasselli G (2001) Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)

  • Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Wirth J, Egger P (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani FP (1981) A study of the physical and mechanical properties of rocks and their discontinuities. Dissertation, University of Nottingham

  • Hong ES, Kwon TH, Cho GC (2009) A study on the asperity degradation of rock joint surfaces using rock-like material specimens. J Korean Soc Rock Mech 11(3):303–314 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn HM, Deere DU (1962) Frictional characteristics of minerals. Géotechnique 12(4):319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung SM, Ghosh A, Ahola MP, Chowdhury AH (1993) Assessment of conventional methodologies for joint roughness coefficient determination. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 30:825–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang TH, Doong YS (1990) Anisotropic shear strength of rock joints, In: Barton N, Stephansson O (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on rock joints. Balkema, Loen, pp 211–218

  • Huang TH, Chang CS, Chao CY (2002) Experimental and mathematical modeling for fracture of rock joint with regular asperities. Eng Fract Mech 69:1977–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(6):319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JC (1959) The frictional properties of joints in rock. Geofisca pura e applicata 43:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang BA, Cho JS (1999) A study on shearing characteristics of joint model. J Eng Geol 9(1):69–82 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang BA, Kim TH, Jang HS (2010) Characterization of the three dimensional roughness of rock joints and proposal of a modified shear strength criterion. J Eng Geol 20(3):319–327 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang HS, Kang SS, Jang BA (2014) Determination of joint roughness coefficients using roughness parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-013-0535-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DY, Lee HS (2009) Quantification of rock joint roughness and development of analyzing system. In: Kulatilake PHSW (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on rock joints and jointed rock masses. Tucson, paper 1019

  • Krahn J, Morgenstern NR (1979) The ultimate frictional resistance of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 16:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krsmanovic D, Langof Z (1964) Large scale laboratory tests of the shear strength of rocky material. Rock Mech Eng Geol Suppl 1:20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Shou G, Huang TH, Morgan RM (1995) New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 32:673–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1970) Simulation of shear behaviour of a jointed rock mass. In: Somerton WH (ed) Proceedings of the 11th symposium on rock mech. AIME, Berkeley, pp 105–125

  • Lane KS, Heck WJ (1964) Triaxial testing for strength of rock joints. In: Spokes EM, Christiansen CR (eds) Proceedings of the 6th US symposium rock mech. USRMS, Rolla, pp 98–108

  • Lange DA, Jennings HM, Shah SP (1993) Relationship between fracture surface roughness and fracture behaviour of cement paste and mortar. J Am Ceram Soc 3:589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CH, Jeong GC (2002) Anisotropy of shear strength according to roughness in joint surface. J Eng Geol 12(4):421–437 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee YH, Carr JR, Barr DJ, Hass CJ (1990) The fractal dimension as a measure of roughness of rock discontinuity profile. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly PA (1982) The shear behaviour of bedding planes in Mt. McRae shale with implications for rock slope design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 19:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic M (1992) New description of shear strength for rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic M (1996) The shear strength components of rough rock joint. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(8):769–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland PL, Allely BH (1957) Volume changes in drained triaxial tests on granular materials. Géotechnique 7:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaliangas TT, Hencher SR, Lumsden AC (1995) A comprehensive peak shear strength criterion for rock joints. In: Fuji T (ed) Proceedings 8th international congress on rock mechanics. Balkema, Tokyo, pp 359–366

  • Park JW, Song JJ (2013) Numerical method for the determination of contact areas of a rock joint under normal and shear loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58:8–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear failure in rock and related material. Dissertation, University of Illinois

  • Reeves MJ (1985) Rock surface roughness and frictional strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 22:429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LR (1975) The shear strength of joints in weathered rock. Dissertation, University of London, Imperial College

  • Seidel JP, Haberfield CM (1995) Towards an understanding of joint roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28:69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stimpson B (1981) A suggested technique for determining the basic friction angle of rock surfaces using core. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2010) A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlationship with JRC. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1391–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 16:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk N, Gerd MJ, Dearman WR, Amin FF (1987) Characterization of rock joint surfaces by fractal dimension. In: Farmer I et al (eds) Proceedings of the 28th US symposium on rock mechanics, Tucson. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1223–1236

  • Wakabayashi N, Fukushige I (1995) Experimental study on the relation between fractal dimension and shear strength. In: Myer LR, Cook NGW, Goodman RE, Tsang CF (eds) Fractured and jointed rock masses. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu TH, Ali EM (1978) Statistical representation of the joint roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15:259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZY, Chiang DY (2000) An experimental study on the progressive shear behavior of rock joints with tooth-shaped asperities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 37:1247–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZY, Lo SC, Di CC (2001) Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z2. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu XB, Vayssade B (1991) Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 28:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in Korea (2011-0007281).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo-An Jang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, HS., Jang, BA. New Method for Shear Strength Determination of Unfilled, Unweathered Rock Joint. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 1515–1534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0660-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0660-3

Keywords

Navigation