Abstract
This paper presents a new technique for estimating the in situ block size distribution in a jointed rock mass. The technique is based on Monte Carlo simulations using more realistic fracture geometry as its input compared to other block size estimation methods described in the literature. This geometry represents fractures as either polygons or triangulated surfaces and therefore models persistence and truncation of fractures accurately. Persistence has been shown to be critically important for the accurate prediction of block size and shape. We show that for rock masses with relatively small discontinuities, the results of our predictions differ markedly from previous methods which over-predict fragmentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn S-H and Lee C-I (2004) Removability analysis of rock blocks by block theory and a probabilistic approach. In SINOROCK 2004 symposium, paper 2A 11. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 3(41) (CD-ROM)
Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(1):3–19 CSIRO (2011)
CSIRO (2011) Large open pit slope stability project. http://www.lop.csiro.au
Da Gama CD (1977) Computer model for block size analysis of jointed rock masses. In 15th APCOM symposium, Brisbane, Australia, pp 305–315
Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51
Elmouttie MK, Poropat GV, Krahenbuhl G (2010) Polyhedral modelling of rock mass structure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:544–552
Goodman RE, Shi G (1985) Block theory and its application to rock engineering. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Hudson JA, Priest SD (1979) Discontinuities and rock mass geometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:339–362
International Society for Rock Mechanics (1978) ISRM commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368
Jern M (2004) Technical Note: Determination of the In Situ Block Size Distribution in fractured Rock, an Approach for Comparing In Situ Rock with Rock Sieve Analysis. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37(5):391–401
Jing L (2000) Block system construction for three-dimensional discrete element models of fractured rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:645–659
Jing L (2003) A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:283–353
Jing L, Stephansson O (1994) Topological identification of block assemblages for jointed rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31:163–172
Kim BH, Cai M, Kaiser PK, Yang HS (2007) Estimation of block sizes for rock masses with non-persistent joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40(2):169–192
Latham J-P, Van Meulen J, Dupray S (2006) Prediction of in situ block size distributions with reference to armourstone for breakwaters. Eng Geol 86:18–36
Lin D, Fairhurst C, Starfield AM (1987) Geometrical identification of three dimensional rock block systems using topological techniques. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 24(6):331–338
Lu J (2002) Systematic identification of polyhedral rock blocks with arbitrary joints and faults. Comp Geotech 29:49–72
Lu P, Latham J-P (1999) Developments in the assessment of in situ block size distributions of rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(1):29–49
Maerz NH and Germain P (1996) Block size determination around underground openings using simulations. In: Proceedings of the FRAGBLAST 5 workshop on measurement of blast fragmentation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 23–24 Aug 1996, pp 215–223
Mauldon M (1998) Estimating mean fracture trace length and density from observations in convex windows. Rock Mech Rock Eng 31(4):201–216
Miles RE (1972) The random division of space. In: Advances in applied probability, supplement: proceedings of the symposium on statistical and probabilistic problems in metallurgy, vol 4, Dec 1972, pp 243–266
Newson HB (1899) On the volume of a polyhedron. Annals Math, Second Series 1(1):108–110
Rogers SF, Kennard DK, Dershowitz WS, Van As A (2007) Characterising the in situ fragmentation of a fractured rock mass using a discrete fracture network approach. In: Eberhardt, Stead and Morrison (eds) Rock mechanics: meeting society’s challenges and demands, Taylor & Francis Group, London
Tonon F, Chen S (2007) Closed-form and numerical solutions for the probability distribution function of fracture diameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 44:332–350
Wang H, Latham J-P, Poole AB (1991) Predictions of block size distribution for quarrying. Q J Eng Geol 24:91–99
Wang LG, Yamashita S, Sugimoto F, Pan C, Tan G (2003) A Methodology for predicting the in situ size and shape distribution of rock blocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36(2):121–142
Young DS, Boontun A, Stone CA (1995) Sensitivity tests on rock block size distribution. In: Daemen and Schultz (eds) Rock mechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Australian Coal Association Research Program in the development of the prototype versions of the algorithms used in elements of the structural modelling. The sponsors of the Large Open Pit Mine Slope Stability Project, which is managed by the CSIRO, are acknowledged for their support in developing applications to utilise the algorithm for the analysis of slope stability phenomena.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elmouttie, M.K., Poropat, G.V. A Method to Estimate In Situ Block Size Distribution. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45, 401–407 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0175-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0175-0