Abstract
Purpose
Several studies have assessed the physician–nurse relationship, particularly between females working together. While the surgeon workforce is increasingly represented by females, gendered relationships and biases in the operating room remain largely unstudied.
Methods
We performed a prospective randomized study in which operative support staff, including nurses, surgical technologists, and surgical assistants, assessed scenarios describing questionable surgeon behaviors. Respondents were randomized to a survey that either discussed a female or male surgeon. For each scenario, one of the four standardized responses was selected. The respondents’ assessments of surgeon behaviors were analyzed.
Results
The response rate was 4.4% (3128/71143). Females were more likely than males to deem the surgeon’s behavior inappropriate regardless of surgeon sex (p = 0.001). The likelihood of writing up the surgeon was predicted by role, with technologists, nurses, and assistants reporting surgeons at frequencies of 65.5%, 53.2%, and 48.8%, respectively (p = 0.008). While the overall respondents did not show a propensity to write-up either sex differentially (p = 0.070), technologists were significantly more likely to report female surgeons than male surgeons (p = 0.006).
Conclusion
Characteristics of operative personnel were correlated with varying tolerance of surgeon behaviors, with specific subgroups more critical of female surgeons than males. Further exploration of these perceptions will serve to improve interactions in a diverse workplace.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- RN:
-
Registered nurse
- OR:
-
Operating room
- ST:
-
Surgical technologist
- SA:
-
Surgical assistant
References
Ali AM, McVay CL. Women in surgery: a history of adversity, resilience, and accomplishment. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(4):670–3.
Wirtzfeld DA. The history of women in surgery. Can J Surg. 2009;52(4):317–20.
McLemore EC, Ramamoorthy S, Peterson CY, Bass BL. Women in surgery: bright, sharp, brave, and temperate. Perm J. 2012;16(3):54–9.
AAMC. Women in US academic medicine and science: statistics and benchmarking report, 2011–2012. 2012. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Women%20in%20U%20S%20%20Academic%20Medicine%20Statistics%20and%20Benchmarking%20Report%202011-20123.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
AAMC. Table C-1: residency applicants to ACGME-accredited programs by specialty and sex, 2018–2019. 2018. https://www.aamc.org/download/321558/data/factstablec1.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
Gjerberg E, Kjolsrod L. The doctor-nurse relationship: how easy is it to be a female doctor co-operating with a female nurse? Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(2):189–202.
Braun HJ, O'Sullivan PS, Dusch MN, Antrum S, Ascher NL. Improving interprofessional collaboration: evaluation of implicit attitudes in the surgeon-nurse relationship. Int J Surg. 2015;13:175–9.
Biernat MFK. Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. J Soc Issues. 2002;57:707–24.
Wear D, Keck-McNulty C. Attitudes of female nurses and female residents toward each other: a qualitative study in one US teaching hospital. Acad Med. 2004;79(4):291–301.
Galvin SL, Parlier AB, Martino E, Scott KR, Buys E. Gender bias in nurse evaluations of residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(Suppl 4):7s–12s.
Bruce AN, Battista A, Plankey MW, Johnson LB, Marshall MB. Perceptions of gender-based discrimination during surgical training and practice. Med Educ Online. 2015;20:25923.
Larson DL. Bridging the generation X gap in plastic surgery training: part 1. Identifying the problem. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(6):1656–61.
Larson DL. Bridging the generation X gap in plastic surgery training: part 2. A proposed solution—identifying a “best practice” in a plastic surgery training program. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(6):1662–5.
Stevens RJ, Hamilton NM. Is there a digital generation gap for e-learning in plastic surgery? J Surg Educ. 2012;69(3):344–9.
Lancaster G, Kolakowsky-Hayner S, Kovacich J, Greer-Williams N. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among physicians, nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47(3):275–84.
House S, Havens D. Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of nurse–physician collaboration: a systematic review. J Nurs Adm. 2017;47(3):165–71.
Singer SJ, Molina G, Li Z, Jiang W, Nurudeen S, Kite JG, et al. Relationship between operating room teamwork, contextual factors, and safety checklist performance. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(4):568–80.e2.
Fudickar A, Horle K, Wiltfang J, Bein B. The effect of the WHO surgical safety checklist on complication rate and communication. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(42):695–701.
Stein LI. The doctor–nurse game. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967;16(6):699–703.
Anhang Price R, Sloss EM, Cefalu M, Farmer CM, Hussey PS. Comparing quality of care in veterans affairs and non-veterans affairs settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(10):1631–8.
Trivedi AN, Matula S, Miake-Lye I, Glassman PA, Shekelle P, Asch S. Systematic review: comparison of the quality of medical care in veterans affairs and non-veterans affairs settings. Med Care. 2011;49(1):76–88.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the following organizations for their assistance in disseminating the survey to their membership: the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, the National Surgical Assistant Association, the Australian College of Perioperative Nurses, the Association of Surgical Technologists, and the Association of Surgical Assistants.
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corsini, E.M., Luc, J.G.Y., Mitchell, K.G. et al. Predictors of the response of operating room personnel to surgeon behaviors. Surg Today 49, 927–935 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01829-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01829-2