Skip to main content
Log in

Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with the on-label use compared with the off-label use of an endoprosthesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is sometimes not performed in accordance with the instructions for use (IFU) of the endoprosthesis (“off-label use”). We investigated whether the off-label use of the endograft affected the outcomes of EVAR.

Methods

Demographic, anatomical, intraoperative and follow-up data on 100 patients in whom the endograft was used on-label in EVAR were compared retrospectively with the corresponding data of 50 patients with off-label endograft use.

Results

The endograft IFU were most often not followed in patients with challenging aortic neck anatomy or iliac access or fixation, steep neck angulation or bilateral hypogastric artery embolization. Compared with patients in whom the device was used on-label, patients with off-label use had significantly higher rates of intraoperative type I or III endoleaks and proximal aortic cuff placement or other adjunctive procedures. However, there were no midterm differences between the two groups in the rates of type 1b or II endoleaks, sac enlargement, device–limb occlusion or patient survival.

Conclusions

Most midterm outcomes of EVAR in which the endografts were used off-label were similar to those associated with on-label use of the devices. Off-label use of EVAR endoprostheses is feasible, but requires the use of special techniques in patients with challenging anatomical features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamasaki R, Komori K, Mori E, Yamaoka T, Kume M, Ishida M, et al. Usefulness of endovascular grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm (in Japanese). Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 1999;90:318–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsumoto T, Komori K, Furuyama T, Shoji T, Kume M, Yamaoka T, et al. Alternative approach to endoluminal treatment of an anastomotic aneurysm. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43:403–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoshina K, Kato M, Hosaka A, Miyahara T, Mikuriya A, Ohkubo N, et al. Middle-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair in Japan: does intraoperative endovascular management against the hostile aneurysmal neck prevent the proximal type I endoleak? Int Angiol. 2011;30:467–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoshina K, Hashimoto T, Kato M, Ohkubo N, Shigematsu K, Miyata T. Feasibility of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outside of the instructions for use and morphological changes at 3 years after the procedure. Ann Vasc Dis. 2014;7:34–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg R, Fairman R, Srivastava S, Criado F, Green R. Endovascular grafting in patients with short proximal necks: an analysis of short-term results. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8:350–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eguchi D, Kawasaki K, Matsumoto T. A case of rapid expansion of a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm with localized dissection. Jpn J Vasc Surg. 2010;19:385.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Angiletta D, Marinazzo D, Guido G, Greco L, Regina G. Spinal cord, bowel, and buttock ischemia after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25(980):e15–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller A, Marotta M, Scordi-Bello I, Tammaro Y, Marin M, Divino C. Ischemic colitis after endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair: a 10-year retrospective study. Arch Surg. 2009;144:900–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroccio A, Faries PL, Morrissey NJ, Teodorescu V, Burks JA, Gravereaux EC, et al. Predicting iliac limb occlusions after bifurcated aortic stent grafting: anatomic and device-related causes. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:679–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naughton PA, Park MS, Kheirelseid EA, O’Neill SM, Rodriguez HE, Morasch MD, et al. A comparative study of the bell-bottom technique vs hypogastric exclusion for the treatment of aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:956–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arko FR, Lee WA, Hill BB, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK. Hypogastric artery bypass to preserve pelvic circulation: improved outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Unno N, Inuzuka K, Yamamoto N, Sagara D, Suzuki M, Konno H. Preservation of pelvic circulation with hypogastric artery bypass in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with bilateral iliac artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee WA, Nelson PR, Berceli SA, Seeger JM, Huber TS. Outcome after hypogastric artery bypass and embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buth J, Laheij RJ. Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: report of a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:134–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:90–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelfand DV, White GH, Wilson SE. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Broker HS, Foteh KI, Murphy EH, Davis CM, Clagett GP, Modrall JG, et al. Device-specific aneurysm sac morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair: evaluation of contemporary graft materials. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:702–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogg ME, Morasch MD, Park T, Flannery WD, Makaroun MS, Cho JS. Long-term sac behavior after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Excluder low-permeability endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Rie Nishikuma for editorial assistance, Junji Kishimoto for statistical advice, Nicholas Smith for language assistance, Renée J. Robillard for English-language editing and WL Gore and Associates for providing funding for the English-language editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest in relation to the contents of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Matsumoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsumoto, T., Tanaka, S., Okadome, J. et al. Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with the on-label use compared with the off-label use of an endoprosthesis. Surg Today 45, 880–885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0978-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0978-1

Keywords

Navigation