Abstract
Objective
To demonstrate the responsiveness of depression after surgery for lumbar degenerative disease and to verify the impact of this condition on surgical outcomes.
Patient sample
A prospective cohort study with 91 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who were evaluated preoperatively, at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively.
Outcome measures
Evolution of depression between the follow-ups and its correlation with satisfaction.
Methods
Depression was assessed with Beck Depression Inventory. According to depression responsiveness, patients were classified into four groups: NN = no depression; ND = normal during the preoperative period and depression within 1 year; DN = depression during the preoperative period and normal within 1 year; DD = depression during the preoperative period and within 1 year.
Results
Prevalence of preoperative depression was 28.6 % and 17.6 % within 1 year postoperatively. Most patients (65.4 %) with depression in the preoperative period recovered postoperatively. Poor preoperative HRQoL measures were associated with higher rates of responsiveness of depression during the follow-up. Patients with depression at the 1-year postoperative follow-up had a worse functional outcome. Patients who improved from depression had similar outcome to those without depression. Dissatisfaction within 1 year postoperatively was greater in patients who become depressed after surgery and remain depressed at 1-year follow-up (NN = 8.8 %; ND = 42.9 %; DN = 17.6 %; DD = 44.4 %; P = 0.012).
Conclusion
Most patients with depression in the preoperative recover within 1 year postoperatively. Responsiveness of depression is associated with surgical outcomes. The presence of depression after the surgical treatment, independent of when it starts, had a major negative impact on prognosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Linton SS (2000) A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1148–1156
Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN et al (2012) Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis. Spine J 12:179–185
Falavigna A, Righesso O, Teles AR et al (2012) Depression Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale applied preoperatively in spinal surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 70:352–356
Falavigna A, Righesso O, Teles AR et al (2009) Clinical and functional evaluation in preoperative period of degenerative disease spine surgery. Coluna/Columna 3:245–253
Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN et al (2013) Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery. Spine J 13:501–506
Arpino L, Lavarone A, Parlato C et al (2004) Prognostic role of depression after lumbar disc surgery. Neurol Sci 25:145–147
Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F et al (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:648–663
Chaichana KL, Mukherjee D, Adogwa O et al (2011) Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 14:261–267
Epker J, Block AR (2001) Presurgical psychological screening in back pain patients: a review. Clin J Pain 17:200–205
Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ et al (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(1999):2229–2233
Levy HI, Hanscom B, Boden SD et al (2002) Three-question depression screener used for lumbar disc herniations and spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1232–1237
Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2002) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2616–2621
Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Fredrickson BE et al (2006) Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:823–830
den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T et al (2006) Continued disability and pain after lumbar disc surgery: the role of cognitive-behavioral factors. Pain 123:45–52
Lebow R, Parker SL, Adogwa O et al (2012) Microdiscectomy improves pain-associated depression, somatic anxiety, and mental well-being in patients with herniated lumbar disc. Neurosurgery 70:306–311
Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Herno A (2009) Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2573–2578
Falavigna A, Teles AR, Braga GLB (2010) Instruments of clinical and functional evaluation in spine surgery. Coluna/Columna 10:4–7
Viinamaki H, Tanskanen A, Honkalampi K et al (2004) Is the Beck Depression Inventory suitable for screening major depression in different phases of the disease? Nord J Psychiatry 58:49–53
Gorenstein C, Andrade L (1996) Validation of a Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Brazilian subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res 29:453–457
Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
Vigatto R, Alexandre NM, Correa Filho HR (2007) Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:481–486
Ware JE (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3130–3139
Ciconelli RMF, Soares PC, Kowalski CCG (1999) Brazilian–Portuguese version of the SF-36. A reliable and valid quality of life outcome measure. Rev Bras Reumatol 39:43–50
Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I et al (1993) A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 52:157–168
de Souza FS, Marinho Cda S, Siqueira FB et al (2008) Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian–Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1028–1033
Compston A (2010) Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty’s Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O’Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: Brain. 133: 2838-2844
Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L et al (1992) Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 268:907–911
Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Breme K, Altmeppen J, Holzschuh M, Brawanski A et al (1999) Variability of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:807–811
Junge A, Fröhlich M, Ahrens S et al (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1056–1064
Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP (2004) Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. Clin J Pain 20:455–461
Hazard RG, Bendix A, Fenwick JW (1991) Disability exaggeration as a predictor of functional restoration outcomes for patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:1062–1067
Turner JA, Robinson J, McCreary CP (1983) Chronic low back pain: predicting response to nonsurgical treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64:560–563
Waddell G, Main CJ, Morris EW (1984) Chronic low-back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:209–213
Falavigna A, de Souza Bezerra ML, Teles AR, Kleber FD, Velho MC, Steiner B (2011) Sleep disorders among undergraduate students in Southern Brazil. Sleep Breath 15:519–524
Falavigna A, Teles AR, Kleber FD, Ferrari P, De Souza MV (2008) Prevalence of depression among undergraduate young adults. RCM-UCS 6:27–33
Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Schoenfeld LS et al (1989) Studies of the Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) in patients with back pain. Psychometric and predictive properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:507–510
Schade V, Semmer N, Main CJ et al (1999) The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain 80:239–249
Linton SJ, Andersson T (2000) Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2825–2831
Rudy TE, Kerns RD, Turk DC (1988) Chronic pain and depression: toward a cognitive-behavioral mediation model. Pain 35:129–140
Turk DC, Okifuji A, Scharff L (1995) Chronic pain and depression: role of perceived impact and perceived control in different age cohorts. Pain 61:93–101
Turner JA, Aaron LA (2001) Pain-related catastrophizing: What is it? Clin J Pain 17:65–71
Sullivan MJ, Lynch ME, Clark AJ (2005) Dimensions of catastrophic thinking associated with pain experience and disability in patients with neuropathic pain conditions. Pain 113:310–315
McCracken LM (2007) A contextual analysis of attention to chronic pain: what the patient does with their pain might be more important than their awareness or vigilance alone. J Pain 8:230–236
Conflict of interest
The author(s) has/have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript. These benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which one or more of the author(s) is/are associated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falavigna, A., Righesso, O., Teles, A.R. et al. Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1), 35–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1651-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1651-0