Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study on outcome of fracture shaft of the humerus treated non-operatively with a functional brace

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Non-operatively treated fractures of the humeral diaphysis have a high rate of union with good functional results. The objective of this study is to find out the outcome of fractures of the humeral diaphysis treated with a functional brace that permits motion of shoulder and elbow joints and progressive use of the injured extremity.

Materials and methods

This was a descriptive analytical study in patients of 16 years and above with closed fracture shaft of humerus treated with a functional brace that permits the motion of shoulder and elbow joints. The fracture arms were initially stabilized with U slab or hanging cast for an average of 11 days before application of brace. Radiographs were made at each follow-up visit until the fracture union occured. Angulation at fracture site, motion at shoulder and elbow joint were measured at the time of removal of brace.

Results

One hundred and five out of 108 fractures (97.2 %) were united with mean duration of 12.16 weeks (range, 7.5–19.3 weeks). Radial nerve injury was present in 6 cases (5.5 %). Varus angulation of ≤15° was present in 90.9 % out of 99 patients, while no angulation was present in 6 cases (5.7 %) out of 105 patients. Apex anterior angulation of ≤10° was present in 100 % out of 48 patients, whereas apex posterior angulation of ≤10° was present in 94.1 % out of 51 patients.

Conclusion

Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis is associated with a high rate of union with nearly normal elbow motion and some restriction of shoulder motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crenshaw AH Jr, Perez EA (2007) Fractures of the shoulder, arm and forearm. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 3389–3398

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fracture of humerus using functional brace. J Ortho Trauma 20:597–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG et al (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:596–601

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blafour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME (1982) Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA et al (1988) Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:607–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell MJ, Beauchamp CG, Kellam JK et al (1985) The results of plating humeral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries. J Bone Joint Surg 67B:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zagorski JB, Aych GA, Latta LL et al (1987) Modern concepts in functional fracture bracing: the upper limb. In: Paul Griffin (ed) Instructional course lectures, vol 36. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Park Ridge, pp 377–401

  8. Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 48B:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  9. Finkemeier CG, Slater RR Jr, et al (2001) Fracture and dislocations of the shoulder girdle and humerus. In: Chapman MW (ed) Chapman’s orthopaedic surgery, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 463–470

  10. Christensen S (1967) Humeral shaft fractures. Operative and conservative treatment. Acta Chir Scand 133:455–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khosla S, Joseph LM III, Dekutoski MB et al (2003) A population based study. JAMA 290:1479–1485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tandon T, Shaik M, Modi N (2007) Paediatric trauma epidemiology in an urban scenario in India. J Orthop Surg 15(1):41–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA et al (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 82:478–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleeker WA, Nijsten MWN, Duis H (1991) Treatment of humeral shaft fractures related to associated injuries. Acta Orthop Scand 62:148–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarmiento A, Horowitch A, Aboulafia A et al (1990) Functional bracing for comminuted extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:283–287

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma VK, Jain AK, Gupta RK et al (1991) Non-operative treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft. A comparative study. J Ind Med Assoc 89:157–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Polloc FH, Drake D, Bovill EG et al (1981) Treatment of radial neuropathy associated with fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ostermann PAW, Ekkernkamp A, Muhr G (1993–1994) Functional bracing of shaft fractures of the humerus—an analysis of 195 cases. Orthop Trans 17:937

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson CM, Bell KM, Court-Brown CM et al (1992) Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Experience in Edinburgh over a two-year period. J Bone Joint Surg 74(4):558–562

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarmiento A, Latta LL, Tarr RR (1984) Principles of fracture healing. Part II. The effects of function on fracture healing and stability. In: Instructional course lectures, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol 33. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 83–106

  21. O Pehlivan (2002) Functional treatment of distal third humerus shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:390–395

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klestil T, Rangger C, Kathrein A et al (1997) Sarmiento bracing of humeral shaft fractures: a comparative study. SOT 20:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ekholm R, Tidermark J (2006) Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20(9):591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was present regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. C. Kapil Mani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapil Mani, K.C., Gopal Sagar, D.C., Rijal, L. et al. Study on outcome of fracture shaft of the humerus treated non-operatively with a functional brace. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23, 323–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-0982-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-0982-3

Keywords

Navigation