Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) to treat peritrochanteric fractures in elderly patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of peritrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis due to the difficulty of obtaining and maintaining stable fixation. Although many implants have been developed to solve this problem, the choice of implant has been controversial. We present 71 consecutive peritrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). The average age of the patients was 80.75 ± 6.42 (71–96) years. The fractures were closely reduced and fixed with PFNA. All of the fractures healed in an average of 14 weeks. The mean operation time was 44.68 ± 8.44 (30–73) minutes, and the mean blood loss was 126.77 ± 49.04 (50–300) ml. One patient was reoperated because of a poor blade position. In three patients, a lateral cortex fracture was observed, and, in one patient, a greater trochanter fracture was observed. At the time of the final follow-up, 78.7% of the patients returned to their pre-injury activity levels. PFNA might be one treatment choice to solve the mechanical problems associated with these fractures because of its improved fixation strength, simpler technique, shorter operation time and reduced blood loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW (1992) Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74-B:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnell O (1997) The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med 103:20S–25S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7:407–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H, Kam BCC, Ehmke LW, Krieg JC, Madey SM, Bottlang M (2004) A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmermacher RKJ, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJH, Ochs U, Werken C (2008) The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 39:932–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van der Heijden FHWM, den Hoed PT, Kerver AJH, van Vugt AB (2004) Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures: randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B:86–94

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N (2009) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 40:428–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takigami I, Ohara A, Yamanaka K et al (2005) Treatment and surgical technique for trochanteric fracture of the femur with proximal femoral nail. Seikeigeka (Orthopedic Surgery) 56:1747–1750

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J, Kummer FJ, Tejwani N (2006) Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Injury 37:984–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2008) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD000093

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. PFNA (2004) Leading the way to optimal stability: synthes. Original instruments and implants of the Association for the Study of Internal fixation. AO/ASIF. Stratec Medical 1–44

  14. Molloy DW, Standish TIM (1997) A guide to the standardized mini mental state examination. Int Psychogeriatr 9(Suppl.1):87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahoney FI, Barthel D (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 14:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E (1992) Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74-B:352–357

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim VY, Han CH, Park JI, Kim FJY (2001) Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to preoperative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 25:360–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pavelka T, Matejka J, Cervenkova H (2005) Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 72:344–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parmer V, Kumar S, Aster A, Harper WH (2005) Review of methods to quantify lag screw placement in hip fracture fixation. Acta Orthop Belg 71:260–263

    Google Scholar 

  20. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F (1996) Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop 20:47–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D, Larrauri PM, Soler JJ (1998) Use of the Gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 350:56–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang CJ, Brown CJ, Yettram AL (2000) Intramedullary fomaral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study. Med Eng Phys 22:613–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF (1979) Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 61:216–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 77:1058–1064

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M (2006) Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3, 279 fractures. Int Orthop 30:69–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozkan K, Cift H, Akan K, Sahin A, Eceviz E, Ugutmen E (2010) Proximal femoral nailing without a fracture table. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 20:229–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Takigami I, Matsumoto K, Ohara A, Yamanaka K, Naganawa T, Ohashi M, Date K, Shimizu K (2008) Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system–report of early results. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66:276–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF (2009) Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop 33:1441–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kristek D, Lovrić I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Sakić K (2010) The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol 34:937–940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kyle RF, Ellis TJ, Templeman DC (2005) Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures with associated femoral neck fractures using a sliding hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 19:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Im GI, Shin YW, Song YJ (2005) Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Menderes Cad. No: 46/1, 35140, Buca – Izmir, Turkey

    Levent Karapinar

  2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Izmir-Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 35100, Izmir, Turkey

    Levent Karapinar, Mert Kumbaraci, Ahmet Kaya, Ahmet Imerci & Mustafa Incesu

Authors
  1. Levent Karapinar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mert Kumbaraci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmet Kaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmet Imerci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mustafa Incesu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Karapinar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karapinar, L., Kumbaraci, M., Kaya, A. et al. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) to treat peritrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22, 237–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0810-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0810-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation