Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomised prospective trial

Diathermie versus incision au bistouri dans l’arthroplastie intermédiaire pour fracture du col du fémur. Etude prospective randomisée

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the age profile of our population expands, we can expect subsequent increase in patients presenting with intracapsular fracture. The onus remains on the surgeon to make all reasonable efforts to find new and innovative means of reducing associated morbidity and mortality of the treatment of these injuries. This challenge is particularly relevant in the elderly and in patients with multiple co-morbidities. In this study, 100 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. One group had dissection to the level of the hip joint under direct diathermy control; the other group had dissection using a scalpel with supplementary electrocautery. Intraoperative total blood loss prior to dissection of the abductors was measured by collecting blood using wound swabs using a local protocol and results were statistically analysed using PROC GLM SAS. We demonstrate a clear advantage in the use of diathermy to create a hip incision showing a significant reduction in wound-related blood loss and a reduction, whilst not statistically significant, in total operative blood loss using diathermy incision. Larger randomised prospective trials are necessary to study the effects of this intervention in a larger patient population so that these end-points can be adequately assessed.

Résumé

Avec le vieillissement de notre population, nous pouvons nous attendre à une augmentation corrélative des patients présentant une fracture intracapsulaire du col du fémur.. C’est une importante responsabilité chirurgicale que de faire tous les efforts raisonnables afin de trouver de nouveaux et innovateurs moyens pour réduire la morbidité et la mortalité associées au traitement de ces lésions. Ce défi est particulièrement approprié pour les personnes âgées et pour les patients présentant des comorbidités multiples. Dans cette étude, cent patients ont été aléatoirement répartis dans deux groupes. Un groupe a bénéficié d’un abord de l’articulation coxo-fémorale par diathermie d’emblée; l’autre groupe a bénéficié d’une dissection à l’aide d’un bistouri avec électrocoagulation complémentaire. La perte totale peropératoire de sang avant la dissection des abducteurs a été mesurée en rassemblant le sang à l’aide de tampons et en utilisant un protocole local et les résultats ont été statistiquement analysés en utilisant PROC GLM SAS. Nous démontrons un avantage clair dans l’utilisation de la diathermie pour l’incision de hanche montrant une réduction significative de la perte de sang dans la plaie, ainsi qu’une réduction, celle-ci par contre statistiquement non significative, de la perte effective totale de sang en utilisant l’incision par diathermie. De plus grandes études randomisées sont nécessaires pour étudier les effets de cette intervention dans une plus grande population de patients afin que ces limites puissent être évaluées de façon exacte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud JP, Adloff M (1980) Electrosurgery and wound healing: an experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res 12:439–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhandari M (2003) Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1673–1681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharyya T, Iorio R, Healy WL (2002) Rate of and risk factors for acute inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:562–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, et al (2001) Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:206–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon AR, Watkin DF (1990) Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb 35:299–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Link WJ (1978) The use of thermal knives in surgery: electrosurgery, lasers, plasma scalpel. Curr Probl Surg 15:1–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruson KI, Aharonoff GB, Egol KA, et al (2002) The relationship between admission hemoglobin level and outcome after hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma 16:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hussain SA, Hussain S (1988) Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain. Br J Surg 75:1179–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial of diathermyversus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 88:41–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiriakopoulos A, Dimitrios T, Dimitrios L (2004) Use of a diathermy system in thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 139:997–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ljungqvist U (1964) Wound sepsis after clean operations. Lancet 13:1095–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker MJ (2000) The management of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:937–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MJ, Khan RJ, Crawford J et al (2002) Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1150–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker MJ, Pervez H (2002) Surgical approaches for inserting hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001707

  15. Sheikh B (2004) Safety and efficacy of electrocautery scalpel utilization for skin opening in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 18:268–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Widman J, Isacson J (1999) Diathermy knife does not reduce bleeding in surgery for primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 70:23–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this article greatly acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Sinéad Waters with all aspects of the statistical work in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Byrne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byrne, F.J., Kearns, S.R., Mulhall, K.J. et al. Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomised prospective trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-007-0220-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-007-0220-6

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation