Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Stand-alone zero-profile devices have already proven safety, and a reduced dysphagia rate was assumed. So far, no level-one evidence is available to prove the proposed advantages of zero-profile implants in multilevel procedures. The aim of this RCT was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of a zero-profile spacer versus cage + plate in two-level ACDF.

Methods

Consecutive patients with contiguous two-level cDD were randomly assigned either to the interventional group (zero-profile device) or to the control group (cage + plate). Primary endpoint of the study was the prevalence of dysphagia at 24 months. Disability, progress of adjacent segment degeneration, fusion status and loss of correction were analyzed as secondary outcome measure. Primary outcome parameter was statistically analyzed by Chi-square test.

Results

Forty-one patients met inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to the interventional and the control group. Dysphagia was frequent in either group at 3 months FU favoring interventional group (p = 0.078). At final FU, less patients of the interventional group complained about dysphagia, but the difference was not significant. No relevant differences at final FU were recorded for NPDI, loss of correction and adjacent-level degeneration. Fusion rate was slightly lower in the interventional group.

Discussion

Two-level ACDF either by a stand-alone zero-profile spacer or cage + plate is safe. Using a zero-profile cage dysphagia was infrequent at 24 months, but the value did not reach statistical significance in comparison with the cage + plate. Hence, this randomized trial was not able to prove the proposed clinical superiority for dysphagia rates for zero-profile anchored spacer in two-level cDD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matz PG, Holly LT, Mummaneni PV et al (2009) Anterior cervical surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:170–173. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.spine08724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matz PG, Holly LT, Groff MW et al (2009) Indications for anterior cervical decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:174–182. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.spine08720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim S-B et al (2009) Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18:218–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Korinth MC (2008) Treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease—current status and trends. Zentralbl Neurochir 69:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1081201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F (2015) A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine 40:E375–E380. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song K-J, Taghavi CE, Lee K-B et al (2009) The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine 34:2886–2892. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181b64f2c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nambiar M, Phan K, Cunningham JE et al (2017) Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26:2258–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5015-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser JF, Hartl R (2007) Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298–303. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P et al (2009) A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine 34:156–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31818ff9c4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HJ, Kelly MP, Ely CG et al (2012) The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine. Spine 37:S65–S74. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31826cb8f5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang J-Y, Song H-S, Lee M et al (2009) Adjacent level ossification development after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation. Spine 34:30–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 27:2453–2458. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000031407.52778.4b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Riley LH, Skolasky RL, Albert TJ et al (2005) Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine 30:2564–2569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasimatis GB, Panagiotopoulos E, Gliatis J et al (2009) Complications of anterior surgery in cervical spine trauma: an overview. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.07.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee MJ, Bazaz R, Furey CG, Yoo J (2005) Influence of anterior cervical plate design on Dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Techn 18:406–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cagli S, Isik HS, Zileli M (2009) Cervical screw missing secondary to delayed esophageal fistula: case report. Turk Neurosurg 19:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gazzeri R, Tamorri M, Faiola A, Gazzeri G (2008) Delayed migration of a screw into the gastrointestinal tract after anterior cervical spine plating. Spine 33:E268–E271. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31816b8831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW et al (2010) Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Techn 23:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0b013e31819e2ab8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schleicher P, Gerlach R, Schär B et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 17:1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0797-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholz M, Schnake KJ, Pingel A et al (2010) A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:666–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1597-9

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao S, Liang Z, Wei W, Ning J (2017) Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 26:975–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4914-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yun D-J, Lee S-J, Park S-J et al (2017) Use of a zero-profile device for contiguous 2-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: comparison with cage with plate construct. World Neurosurg 97:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Wang H, Li X et al (2016) Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 25:1881–1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz M, Pingel A, Schleicher P, Kandziora F (2014) A cervical “zero-profile” cage with integrated angle-stable fixation: 24-months results. Acta Orthop Belg 80:558–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Stulik J et al (2009) Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Spine 34:641–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318198ce10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D et al (2010) Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:674–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1614-z

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerszten PC, Paschel E, Mashaly H et al (2016) Outcomes evaluation of zero-profile devices compared to stand-alone PEEK cages for the treatment of three- and four-level cervical disc disease. Cureus 8:e775. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ et al (1998) Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord 11:410–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. He S, Feng H, Lan Z et al (2017) A randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between zero-profile and traditional multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ et al (2010) What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:658–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1731-8

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 32:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318154c57e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Findlay C, Ayis S, Demetriades AK (2018) Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis of data from a total of 3160 patients across 14 randomized controlled trials with both short- and medium- to long-term outcomes. Bone Joint J 100-B:991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b8.bjj-2018-0120.r1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson PA, Nassr A, Currier BL et al (2017) Evaluation of adverse events in total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of FDA summary of safety and effectiveness data. Global Spine J 7:76S–83S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568216688195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chin KR, Eiszner JR, Adams SB Jr (2007) Role of plate thickness as a cause of dysphagia after anterior cervical. Spine 32:2585–2590. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318158dec8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yin M, Ma J, Huang Q et al (2016) The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1274-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Duan Y, Yang Y, Wang Y et al (2016) Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-profile device versus plate and cage in treating cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 33:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nemoto O, Kitada A, Naitou S et al (2015) Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S127–S134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1547-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee D-H, Lee J-S, Yi J-S et al (2013) Anterior cervical plating technique to prevent adjacent-level ossification development. Spine J 13:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main gGmbH, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    M. Scholz, P. Schleicher, A. Pingel, C. Hoffmann & F. Kandziora

  2. Neurosurgical Department, Acıbadem University Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul, Turkey

    B. Onal

Authors
  1. M. Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Onal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Schleicher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Pingel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Kandziora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Scholz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors M.S. and F.K. have received consulting and speakers honorarium for company Depuy Synthes. The other authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholz, M., Onal, B., Schleicher, P. et al. Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study. Eur Spine J 29, 2814–2822 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06454-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06454-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation