Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new method to precisely control the depth of percutaneous screws into the pedicle by counting the rotation number of the screw with low radiation exposure: technical note

  • Ideas and Technical Innovations
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Technique note.

Objectives

To report a new method for precisely controlling the depth of percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)—without radiation exposure to surgeons and less fluoroscopy exposure to patients than with conventional methods.

Summary of background data

PPS is widely used in minimal invasive spine surgery; the advantages include reduced muscle damage, pain, and hospital stays. However, placement of PPS demands repeated checking with fluoroscopy. Thus, radiation exposure is considerable for both surgeons and patients.

Methods

The PPS depth was determined by counting rotations of the screws. The distance between screw threads can be measured for particular screws; thus, full rotations of the PPS results in the screw advancing in the pedicle the distance between screw threads. To fully insert screws into the pedicle, the number of full rotations is equal to the number of threads in the PPS.

Results

We applied this technique in 58 patients with thoracolumbar fracture. The position and depth of the screws was checked during the operation with the C-arm and after operation by anteroposterior X-ray film or computed tomography. No additional procedures were required to correct the screws; we observed no neurological deficits or malpositioning of the screws. In the screw placement procedure, the radiation exposure for surgeons is zero, and the patient is well protected from extensive radiation exposure.

Conclusions

This method of counting rotation of screws is a safe way to precisely determine the depth of PPS in the placement procedure.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohba T, Ebata S, Fujita K, Sato H, Haro H (2016) Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25(6):1775–1780. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4489-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, Lee HY (2005) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 30(1):123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bronsard N, Boli T, Challali M, de Dompsure R, Amoretti N, Padovani B, Bruneton G, Fuchs A, de Peretti F (2013) Comparison between percutaneous and traditional fixation of lumbar spine fracture: intraoperative radiation exposure levels and outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 99(2):162–168. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman TM, Blizzard DJ, Brown CR (2016) CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25(6):1781–1786. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4163-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Chan CY, Zamani R, Hansen-Algenstaedt N (2016) A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference? Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25(6):1745–1753. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4150-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2009) Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 11(4):471–476. doi:10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson DG, Sayadipour A, Shelby K, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Weinstein MS (2011) Anterior interbody arthrodesis with percutaneous posterior pedicle fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 20(8):1323–1330. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1782-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MC, Chung HT, Cho JL, Kim DJ, Chung NS (2011) Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20(10):1635–1643. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1892-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N (2004) Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiology 232(3):701–707. doi:10.1148/radiol.2323031412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schils F, Schoojans W, Struelens L (2013) The surgeon’s real dose exposure during balloon kyphoplasty procedure and evaluation of the cement delivery system: a prospective study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22(8):1758–1764. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2702-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81201383).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenzhi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Zhang, F., Zhang, W. et al. A new method to precisely control the depth of percutaneous screws into the pedicle by counting the rotation number of the screw with low radiation exposure: technical note. Eur Spine J 26, 750–753 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4870-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4870-0

Keywords

Navigation