Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The cervical spine has a linear chain of correlation or reciprocal relationship regionally (within the cervical spine) and globally (head to whole spine). The purpose of this study was to assess the sequential alignment change of the regional and global cervical spine after two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed on the lower cervical spine.

Methods

This study included 61 patients (mean age 56 ± 8.6 years; range 35–70 years) who underwent ACDF at C5-6-7 with a plate-cage construct and whose C-spine neutral lateral radiographs showed an identical degree of horizontal gaze (occipital slope) peri-operatively. We compared the change in cervical curvature from the occiput to C7 with the absolute value (slope angle) and relative value (between two different slopes). We also investigated the correlated change in multiple angular parameters according to the change in the occipital slope.

Results

The occipital slope was significantly correlated with the value of the C1-slope (r = 0.33) and C2- slope (r = 0.51). The value of the center of the sellar turcica-C7 sagittal vertical axis (St-SVA) was very closely related to the C1-slope (r = −0.83), C2-slope (r = −0.8), C2-7 angle (r = −0.43), and C2-5 angle (r = −0.46). The amount of angular change at the surgical level (C5-7A) was 5.8° (2.9° -> 8.5°), and the sum of the change in the C5-slope and C7-slope was 6° (3.1° + 2.9°). In general, the C2-5 angle decreased about 3°, in proportion to the upward inclination of C5-slope (3.1°), because the C2-slope was fixed. However, patients who showed improvement in cervical alignment (greatly increased C5-7 lordosis or greatly decreased St-SVA after surgery) often had upper cervical slope change (C1-s and C2-s).

Conclusions

The ACDF procedure itself can induce regional slope change (C5-s and C7-s) directly at the surgical level and can also influence upper cervical slope change (C1-s and C2s) indirectly. Then the change in the upper cervical spine can induce a change in the St-CVA and spino-cranial angle (SCA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Huec JC, Demezon H, Aunoble S (2015) Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24:63–71. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3632-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Nakamura M, Nishizawa T, Toyama Y (2003) Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 99:80–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kwack YH, Son ES (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E41–E47. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Asazuma T, Suzuki N, Fujimura Y, Hirabayashi K (1994) Realignment of postoperative cervical kyphosis in children by vertebral remodeling. Spine 19:2565–2570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsunaga S, Onishi T, Sakou T (2001) Significance of occipitoaxial angle in subaxial lesion after occipitocervical fusion. Spine 26:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CH, Kim KJ, Hyun SJ, Yeom JS, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2015) Subsidence as of 12 months after single-level anterior cervical inter-body fusion. Is it related to clinical outcomes? Acta Neurochirurgica. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2388-6

  7. Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW (2014) Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment. Spine 39:1280–1287. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grasso G, Giambartino F, Tomasello G, Iacopino G (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C peek cage: cervical alignment and patient outcomes. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23(Suppl 6):650–657. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3553-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nemoto O, Kitada A, Naitou S, Tachibana A, Ito Y, Fujikawa A (2015) Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthopedie Traumatologie 25(Suppl 1):S127–S134. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1547-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattei TA, Rehman AA, Issawi A, Fassett DR (2015) Surgical challenges in the management of cervical kyphotic deformity in patients with severe osteoporosis: an illustrative case of a patient with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4092-x

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lundstrom A, Lundstrom F (1995) The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthodont Const Soc Am Board Orthodont 107:537–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Ames CP (2015) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S14–S21. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b (discussion S21)

  13. Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL, Mason A, Burneikiene S (2011) Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery 68:1309–1316. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b51f3 (discussion 1316)

  14. Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:555–561. doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.00599

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ho Jin Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors certify that that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.T., Lee, H.J., Choi, D.Y. et al. Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 25, 2223–2232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4401-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4401-z

Keywords

Navigation