Abstract
Background
Inadequacy of posterior osteophyte resection in anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery has long been a clinical concern as it may influence surgical outcome. There has been no agreement on the prognosis in the presence of remnant posterior osteophytes.
Methods
This study retrospectively investigated 26 cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients after ACDF in whom a remnant posterior osteophyte was identified by long-term follow-up CT scans (minimum of 2 years). Remnant posterior osteophytes and osseous spinal canal were measured and compared between pre-operation CT and long-term post-operation CT. The post-operative clinical outcomes were also studied.
Results
The remnant osteophytes did not obviously decrease in size in any patient and significantly enlarged in 10 patients, with a new posterior osteophyte developing in one patient. In patients whose remnant osteophyte is enlarged, the incidence of pseudoarthrosis, as well as clinical deterioration during follow-up was significantly higher than patients with stable osteophytes.
Conclusion
Contrary to previous reports, none of the remnant posterior osteophytes decreased obviously in size during follow up. Despite the persistence of posterior osteophytes, ACDF is still effective in CSM treatment. Posterior osteophyte enlargement at fused segment appears to be associated with symptomatic pseudoarthrosis and clinical deterioration after surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC, Wiecking DK (1962) The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44(8):1569–1587
De Palma AF, Cooke AJ (1968) Results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 60:169–186
Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K (2001) Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 26:1443–1448
Shibuya S, Komatsubara S, Oka S, Kanda Y, Arima N, Yamamoto T (2010) Difference between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spinal cord 48:214–220
Yonenobu K, Okada K, Fuji T, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K (1986) Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 11(8):818–823
White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Kinematics of the spine. In: White AA, Panjabi MM (eds) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 85–126
Gore DR, Gardner GM, Sepic SB, Murray MP (1986) Roentgenographic findings following anterior cervical fusion. Skeletal Radiol 15(7):556–559
Stevens JM, Clifton AG, Whitear P (1993) Appearances of posterior osteophytes after sound anterior interbody fusion in the cervical spine: a high-definition computed myelographic study. Neuroradiology 35(3):227–228
Seo JY, Ha KY (2012) Fate of posterior osteophytes in the fused segments after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 37(9):741–747
Cooper PR (1992) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: management with anterior operation. In: Cooper PR (ed) Degenerative disease of the cervical spine. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, pp 73–89
Freidberg SR, Pfeifer BA, Dempsey PK, Tarlov EC, Dube MA, Day JD, Machado DE (2001) Intraoperative computerized tomography scanning to assess the adequacy of decompression in anterior cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 94(1):8–11
Hejazi N, Witzmann A, Hassler W (2003) Intraoperative cervical epidurography: a simple modality for assessing the adequacy of decompression during anterior cervical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 98(1):96–99
Buchowski JM, Liu G, Bunmaprasert T, Rose PS, Riew KD (2008) Anterior cervical fusion assessment. Surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation. Spine 33(11):1185–1191
Epstein NE, Silvergleide RS (2003) Documenting fusion following anterior cervical surgery: a comparison of roentgenogram versus two-dimensional computed tomographic findings. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(3):243–247
Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 68:490–503
Treynelis VC, Arnold PM, Fourney DR, Bransford RJ, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC (2013) Alternative procedures for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: arthroplasty, oblique corpectomy, skip laminectomy. Spine 38:S210–S231
Emery SE (2015) Anterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: which? When? How? Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2):S150–S159
Rocchi G, Caroli E, Salvati M, Delfini R (2005) Multilevel oblique corpectomy without fusion. Our experience in 48 patients. Spine 30(17):1963–1969
Moon MS, Moon YW, Kim SS, Moon JL (2006) Morphological adaptation of the bone graft and fused bodies after non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion of the lower cervical spine. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(3):303–309
Nathan M, Pope MH, Grobler LJ (1994) Osteophyte formation in the vertebral column: a review of the etiologic factors—part I. Contemp Orthop 29:31–37
Van Lent PL, Blom AB, Van Der Kraan P, Holthuysen AE, Vitters E, Van Rooijen N, Smeets RL, Nabbe KCAM, Van Den Berg WB (2004) Crucial role of synovial lining macrophages in the promotion of transforming growth factor beta-mediated osteophyte formation. Arthritis Rheum 50(1):103–111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors did not have any conflict of interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Luo, X., Zhou, J. et al. Prognosis of posterior osteophyte after anterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using three-dimensional computed tomography study. Eur Spine J 25, 1861–1868 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4390-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4390-y