Skip to main content
Log in

Single-stage surgery for compressive thoracic myelopathy associated with compressive cervical myelopathy and/or lumbar spinal canal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical impact of the coexistence of compressive cervical myelopathy (CM) and/or lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS) with compressive thoracic myelopathy (TM) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, clinical pictures, and surgical outcomes of patients with compressive TM and the coexistence of compressive CM and/or LCS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients (18 women and 32 men; mean age 68.4 years) who underwent decompression surgery for TM. Mean follow-up period was 44 months. The incidence and clinical features of the coexistence of CM and/or LCS were investigated. The surgical outcomes after single-stage multilevel decompression surgery were also examined using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores.

Results

Of 50 patients, 35 had concurrent CM and/or LCS (combined group), and the remaining 15 only had TM (T group). No significant differences were found with regard to sex, the etiology of TM, or the level of thoracic stenosis between the groups; however, the patients’ age and preoperative JOA scores in the combined group were significantly higher than those in the T group. In both groups, the JOA score at the final follow-up significantly improved compared to the preoperative JOA score.

Conclusions

About 70 % of patients who underwent surgery for TM had concurrent CM and/or LCS, and they were initially diagnosed with CM or LCS. Single-stage multilevel decompression surgery for TM with concurrent CM and/or LCS is comparable to thoracic only surgery with regard to complications and surgical results, and it is well tolerated in elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalfas IH (2000) Laminectomy for thoracic spinal canal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus 9:e2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aizawa T, Sato T, Sasaki H, Matsumoto F, Morozumi N, Kusakabe T, Itoi E, Kokubun S (2007) Results of surgical treatment for thoracic myelopathy: minimum 2-year follow-up study in 132 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 7:13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Lavine LS (1983) Degenerative spondylolisthesis with an intact neural arch: a review of 60 cases with an analysis of clinical findings and the development of surgical management. Neurosurgery 13:555–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogawa Y, Yukawa Y, Morita D, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F (2013) 10-second step test for quantitative evaluation of the severity of thoracic compressive myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1405–1408. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182987495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Japan Intractable Diseases Information Center. What is an intractable disease? http://www.nanbyou.or.jp/english/nan_itiran_45.html. Accessed 9 June 2014

  6. Tsutsumimoto T, Shimogata M, Yui M, Ohta H, Misawa H (2012) The natural history of asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:378–384. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fushimi K, Miyamoto K, Hioki A, Hosoe H, Takeuchi A, Shimizu K (2013) Neurological deterioration due to missed thoracic spinal stenosis after decompressive lumbar surgery: a report of six cases of tandem thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint J 95-B:1388–1391. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta A, Dave B, Nanda A, Hosoe H, Takeuchi A, Shimizu K (2009) Concomitant noncontiguous level (thoracic & lumbar) spinal stenosis. Int Orthop 33:483–488. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0545-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto Y, Harimaya K, Doi T, Kawaguchi K, Okada S, Inoguchi A, Fujiwara M, Iwamoto Y (2012) Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome of the symptomatic ossification of ligamentum flavum at the thoracic level with combined lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:465–470. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1438-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Tsuji T, Sakai Y, Yukawa Y, Nakamura H, Ito K, Ishiguro N (2005) Surgical outcome of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the thoracic spine: implication of the type of ossification and surgical options. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang UK, Choe WJ, Chung CK, Kim HJ (2001) Surgical treatment for thoracic spinal stenosis. Spinal Cord 39:362–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyakoshi N, Shimada Y, Suzuki T, Hongo M, Kasukawa Y, Okada K, Itoi E (2003) Factors related to long-term outcome after decompressive surgery for ossification of the ligamentum flavum of the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine 3:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naderi S, Mertol T (2002) Simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery for combined symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenoses. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:229–232 (discussion 231–232)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Mirzanli C, Karatoprak O, Tezer M, Hamzaoglu A (2007) Treatment approach in tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Belg 73:234–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kikuike K, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Karatoprak O, Tezer M, Hamzaoglu A (2009) One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:593–601. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929cbd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ (1987) Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression. J Neurosurg 66:842–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eskander MS, Aubin ME, Drew JM, Eskander JP, Balsis SM, Eck J, Lapinsky AS, Connolly PJ (2011) Is there a difference between simultaneous or staged decompressions for combined cervical and lumbar stenosis? J Spinal Disord Tech 24:409–413. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318201bf94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnan A, Dave BR, Kambar AK, Ram H (2014) Coexisting lumbar and cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): an infrequent presentation. Retrospective analysis of single-stage surgery (53 cases). Eur Spine J 23:64–73. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2868-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Fukuta S, Shimizu K (2008) Two-stage decompression for combined epiconus and cauda equina syndrome due to multilevel spinal canal stenosis of the thoracolumbar spine: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:955–958. doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0555-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Tsutsumimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive grants or external funding to support this research or the preparation of this manuscript. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uehara, M., Tsutsumimoto, T., Yui, M. et al. Single-stage surgery for compressive thoracic myelopathy associated with compressive cervical myelopathy and/or lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Eur Spine J 25, 1904–1911 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4133-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4133-5

Keywords

Navigation