Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The preoperative identification of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LSFS) is important because a lack of recognition of this clinical entity is often associated with failed back surgery syndrome. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used, and is considered by many as an appropriate tool for studying spine pathologies, there is limited data to suggest that MRI examinations are sufficiently sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of LSFS. There is a paucity of literature on the diagnostic performance of the combination of conventional diagnostic imaging methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the characteristics of conventional diagnostic imaging for symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Methods

The characteristics of conventional diagnostic imaging of LSFS (X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and MRI) were assessed in 68 patients in whom the site of the stenosis was confirmed by means of selective decompression surgeries.

Results

Measurement of the foraminal width and height on CT imaging of the diseased side was significantly less than that on the intact side in the LSFS group. The grading scale for facet joint arthritis on the diseased side was significantly higher than that on the intact side in the LSFS group. The prevalence of the vacuum phenomenon and stage of intervertebral disk (IVD) pathology were higher in the L5–S1 spine of the LSFS group (95.2 %) compared with the lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS) group (21.1 %). MRI study revealed that the prevalence of Type 3 Modic changes was significantly higher in the LSFS group (39.3 %) compared with the LCS group (7.7 %).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates combination of conventional imaging techniques, to improve the detection of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fager CA, Freidberg SR (1980) Analysis of failures and poor results of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:87–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pheasant HC, Dyck P (1982) Failed lumbar disc surgery: cause, assessment, treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (164):93–109

  3. Cramer GD, Cantu JA, Dorsett RD, Greenstein JS, McGregor M, Howe JE, Glenn WV (2003) Dimensions of the lumbar intervertebral foramina as determined from the sagittal plane magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26:160–170. doi:10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54109-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Attias N, Hayman A, Hipp JA, Noble P, Esses SI (2006) Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis–a surgeon’s perspective. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:249–256. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000203942.81050.c8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Splendiani A, Ferrari F, Barile A, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M (2014) Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system. Radiol Med (Torino) 119:164–174. doi:10.1007/s11547-013-0330-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nemoto O, Fujikawa A, Tachibana A (2014) Three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI and its diagnostic value for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24(Suppl 1):S209–S214. doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1377-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168:177–186. doi:10.1148/radiology.168.1.3289089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Albert HB, Briggs AM, Kent P, Byrhagen A, Hansen C, Kjaergaard K (2011) The prevalence of MRI-defined spinal pathoanatomies and their association with modic changes in individuals seeking care for low back pain. Eur Spine J 20:1355–1362. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1794-6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasegawa K, Shimoda H, Kitahara K, Sasaki K, Homma T (2011) What are the reliable radiological indicators of lumbar segmental instability? J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:650–657. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada K, Aota Y, Higashi T, Ishida K, Nimura T, Konno T, Saito T (2014) Lumbar foraminal stenosis causes leg pain at rest. Eur Spine J 23:504–507. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3055-3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowicki BH, Haughton VM, Schmidt TA, Lim TH, An HS, Riley LH 3rd, Yu L, Hong JW (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1605–1614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, Hasegawa T, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2412–2420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sokolowski MJ, Garvey TA, Perl J 2nd, Sokolowski MS, Cho W, Mehbod AA, Dykes DC, Transfeldt EE (2008) Prospective study of postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:108–113. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39af

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Ou Y, Yeasting RA (1998) Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1065–1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Upendra BN, Meena D, Chowdhury B, Ahmad A, Jayaswal A (2008) Outcome-based classification for assessment of thoracic pedicular screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:384–390. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181646ba1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, Renton P, Taylor BA (1998) Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J 7:363–368

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:757–764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iguchi T, Ozaki T, Chin T, Tsumura N, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Kuroda R, Doita M, Nishida K (2011) Intimate relationship between instability and degenerative signs at L4/5 segment examined by flexion-extension radiography. Eur Spine J 20:1349–1354. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1793-7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamada K, Aota Y, Higashi T, Ishida K, Niimura T, Konno T, Saito T (2014) Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3683-2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yoshito Aikawa and Hiroshi Kumagai for their assistance in describing the imaging settings utilized.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuro Ohba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohba, T., Ebata, S., Fujita, K. et al. Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging. Eur Spine J 24, 2269–2275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3859-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3859-4

Keywords

Navigation