Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Torsion biomechanics of the spine following lumbar laminectomy: a human cadaver study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lumbar laminectomy affects spinal stability in shear loading. However, the effects of laminectomy on torsion biomechanics are unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laminectomy on torsion stiffness and torsion strength of lumbar spinal segments following laminectomy and whether these biomechanical parameters are affected by disc degeneration and bone mineral density (BMD).

Methods

Ten human cadaveric lumbar spines were obtained (age 75.5, range 59–88). Disc degeneration (MRI) and BMD (DXA) were assessed. Disc degeneration was classified according to Pfirrmann and dichotomized in mild or severe. BMD was defined as high BMD (≥median BMD) or low BMD (<median BMD). Laminectomy was performed either on L2 (5×) or L4 (5×). Twenty motion segments (L2–L3 and L4–L5) were isolated. The effects of laminectomy, disc degeneration and BMD on torsion stiffness (TS) and torsion moments to failure (TMF) were studied.

Results

Load–displacement curves showed a typical bi-phasic pattern with an early torsion stiffness (ETS), late torsion stiffness (LTS) and a TMF. Following laminectomy, ETS decreased 34.1 % (p < 0.001), LTS decreased 30.1 % (p = 0.027) and TMF decreased 17.6 % (p = 0.041). Disc degeneration (p < 0.001) and its interaction with laminectomy (p < 0.031) did significantly affect ETS. In the mildly degenerated group, ETS decreased 19.7 % from 7.6 Nm/degree (6.4–8.4) to 6.1 Nm/degree (1.5–10.3) following laminectomy. In the severely degenerated group, ETS decreased 22.3 % from 12.1 Nm/degree (4.6–21.9) to 9.4 Nm/degree (5.6–14.3) following laminectomy. In segments with low BMD, TMF was 40.7 % (p < 0.001) lower than segments with high BMD [34.9 Nm (range 23.7–51.2) versus 58.9 Nm (range 43.8–79.2)].

Conclusions

Laminectomy affects both torsion stiffness and torsion load to failure. In addition, torsional strength is strongly affected by BMD whereas disc degeneration affects torsional stiffness. Assessment of disc degeneration and BMD pre-operatively improves the understanding of the biomechanical effects of a lumbar laminectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel MS (1989) Transverse posterior element fractures associated with torsion. Skeletal Radiol 17:556–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1981) The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1983) The mechanical function of the lumbar apophyseal joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:327–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2151–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisschop A, Mullender MG, Kingma I, Jiya TU, van der Veen AJ, Roos JC, van Dieen JH, van Royen BJ (2011) The impact of bone mineral density and disc degeneration on shear strength and stiffness of the lumbar spine following laminectomy. Eur Spine J 21:530–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bisschop A, van Royen BJ, Mullender MG, Paul CP, Kingma I, Jiya TU, van der Veen AJ, van Dieen JH (2012) Which factors prognosticate spinal instability following lumbar laminectomy? Eur Spine J 21:2640–2648

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D (1989) Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:606–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Busscher I, van Dieen JH, van der Veen AJ, Kingman I, Meijer GJM, Verkerke GJ, Veldhuizen AG (2011) The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26:438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farfan HF (1969) Effects of torsion on the intervertebral joints. Can J Surg 12:336–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farfan HF (1984) The torsional injury of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Farfan HF, Cossette JW, Robertson GH, Wells RV, Kraus H (1970) The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:468–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon SJ, Yang KH, Mayer PJ, Mace AH Jr, Kish VL, Radin EL (1991) Mechanism of disc rupture. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:450–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunzburg R, Hutton WC, Crane G, Fraser RD (1992) Role of the capsulo-ligamentous structures in rotation and combined flexion-rotation of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 5:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haher TR, O’Brien M, Felmly WT, Welin D, Perrier G, Choueka J, Devlin V, Vassiliou A, Chow G (1992) Instantaneous axis of rotation as a function of the three columns of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hans D, Barthe N, Boutroy S, Pothuaud L, Winzenrieth R, Krieg MA (2011) Correlations between trabecular bone score, measured using anteroposterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry acquisition, and 3-dimensional parameters of bone microarchitecture: an experimental study on human cadaver vertebrae. J Clin Densitom 14:302–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kingma I, Bosch T, Bruins L, van Dieen JH (2004) Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading. Ergonomics 47:1365–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kingma I, van Dieen JH, de Looze M, Toussaint HM, Dolan P, Baten CT (1998) Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist. J Biomech 31:527–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollintine P, Przybyla AS, Dolan P, Adams MA (2004) Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines. J Biomech 37:197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Renau A, Farrerons J, Yoldi B, Gil J, Proubasta I, Llauger J, Olivan JG, Planell J (2004) Yield point in prediction of compressive behavior of lumbar vertebral body by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7:382–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan JS, Kayanja MM, St Clair SF (2010) The difference in spine specimen dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density between in situ and in vitro scans. Spine J 10:784–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dieen JH, van der Veen A, van Royen BJ, Kingma I (2006) Fatigue failure in shear loading of porcine lumbar spine segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Arno Bisschop, Timothy U. Jiya, Margriet G. Mullender, Cornelis P. L. Paul, Marinus de Kleuver & Barend J. van Royen

  2. Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research institute MOVE, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jaap H. van Dieën & Idsart Kingma

  3. Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Albert J. van der Veen

Authors
  1. Arno Bisschop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaap H. van Dieën
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Idsart Kingma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert J. van der Veen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Timothy U. Jiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Margriet G. Mullender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cornelis P. L. Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marinus de Kleuver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Barend J. van Royen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barend J. van Royen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisschop, A., van Dieën, J.H., Kingma, I. et al. Torsion biomechanics of the spine following lumbar laminectomy: a human cadaver study. Eur Spine J 22, 1785–1793 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2699-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2699-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation