Skip to main content
Log in

Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after posterior fusion in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) management can be associated with loss of thoracic kyphosis and a secondary loss of lumbar lordosis leading to iatrogenic flatback. Such conditions are associated with poorer clinical outcomes during adulthood. The aim of this study was to evaluate sagittal plane reciprocal changes after posterior spinal fusion in the setting of AIS.

Methods

Thirty consecutive adolescents (mean age 14.6 years) with AIS Lenke 1, 2 or 3 were included in this retrospective study with 2 year follow-up. Full-spine standing coronal and lateral radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 3 and 24 months postoperatively. Coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured. Surgical procedure was similar in all the cases, with use of pedicular screws between T11 and the lowest instrumented vertebra (≥L2), sublaminar hooks applied in compression at the upper thoracic level and sub-laminar bands and clamps in the concavity of the deformity. Statistical analysis was done using t test and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

Between preoperative and last follow-up evaluations a significant reduction of Cobb angle was observed (53.6° vs. 17.2°, p < 0.001). A significant improvement of the instrumented thoracic kyphosis, TK (19.7° vs. 26.2°, p < 0.005) was noted, without difference between 3 and 24 months postoperatively. An improvement in lumbar lordosis, LL (43.9° vs. 47.3°, p = 0.009) was also noted but occurred after the third postoperative month. A significant correlation was found between TK correction and improvement of LL (R = 0.382, p = 0.037), without correlation between these reciprocal changes and the amount of coronal correction.

Conclusion

Results from this study reveal that sagittal reciprocal changes occur after posterior fusion when TK is restored. These changes are visible after 3 months postoperatively, corresponding to a progressive adaptation of patient posture to the surgically induced alignment. These changes are not correlated with coronal plane correction of the deformity. In the setting of AIS, TK restoration is a critical goal and permits favorable postural adaptation. Further studies will include pelvic parameters and clinical scores in order to evaluate the impact of the noted reciprocal changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A, Hostin R, Schwab F, Wood K, Akbarnia B (2009) Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2186–2190. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b05146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, Bridwell KH, Hurford RK, Lee SS, Theerajunyaporn T, Lenke LG (2005) Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws–which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2104–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C, Vallade MJ (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1579–1587. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886be

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cui G, Watanabe K, Nishiwaki Y, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M (2012) Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2274-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daffner SD, Beimesch CF, Wang JC (2010) Geographic and demographic variability of cost and surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1165–1169. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d88e78

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illes T (2002) Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:754–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger H (1989) The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop 9:541–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher ND, Hopkins J, McClung A, Browne R, Sucato DJ (2011) Residual thoracic hypokyphosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and clinical ramifications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216106c

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, Loder RT, Hensinger RN (1995) The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 15:627–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ (2011) The impact of segmental and en bloc derotation maneuvers on scoliosis correction and rib prominence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 16:345–350. doi:10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Gressot LV, Hubler K, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, Betz RR, Cahill PJ (2012) Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21:31–39. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1991-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imrie M, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Wenger DR, Newton PO (2011) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: should 100 % correction be the goal? J Pediatr Orthop 31:S9–13. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd8a24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jansen RC, van Rhijn LW, Duinkerke E, van Ooij A (2007) Predictability of the spontaneous lumbar curve correction after selective thoracic fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16:1335–1342. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0320-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jouve JL, de Gauzy JS, Blondel B, Launay F, Accadbled F, Bollini G (2009) Use of the Universal Clamp for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: preliminary results in scoliosis. J Child Orthop. doi:10.1007/s11832-009-0221-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Beausejour M, Stokes IA, Parent S, Labelle H (2009) A three-dimensional retrospective analysis of the evolution of spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:23–37. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0817-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E599–E606. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafage V, Schwab F, Boachie-Adjei O, Farcy JP, Shelokov A, Hostin R, Hart R, Akbarnia B, O’Brien M, Burton D, Shaffrey C, Group ISS (2009) The impact of reciprocal regional alignment changes distant from the site of spinal osteotomies affects post-operative spinal balance. Scoliosis Research Society, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lafage V, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Akbarnia B, Ames C, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Hart R, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Wood K, Bess RS, Group ISS (2010) Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Scoliosis Research Society, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1598–1604. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178872a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenke LG, Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH (2003) The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S199–S207. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000092216.16155.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Dumonski ML, Samartzis D, Hong J, He S, Zhu X, Wang C, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Li M (2010) Coronal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the fulcrum-bending radiograph: a prospective comparative analysis of the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. Eur Spine J 20:105–111. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1495-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, Weidenbaum M, Gomez JA, Lee FY, Hyman JE, Roye DP Jr (2007) Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:448–452. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazda K, Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, Fitoussi F, Pennecot GF (2009) Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal Clamp. Eur Spine J 18:158–169. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0839-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mladenov KV, Vaeterlein C, Stuecker R (2011) Selective posterior thoracic fusion by means of direct vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: effects on the sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J 20:1114–1117. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1740-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Newton PO, Yaszay B, Upasani VV, Pawelek JB, Bastrom TP, Lenke LG, Lowe T, Crawford A, Betz R, Lonner B (2010) Preservation of thoracic kyphosis is critical to maintain lumbar lordosis in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1365–1370. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dccd63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Petcharaporn M, Pawelek J, Bastrom T, Lonner B, Newton PO (1976) The relationship between thoracic hyperkyphosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b1bef

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samdani AF, Hwang SW, Miyanji F, Lonner B, Marks MC, Sponseller PD, Newton PO, Cahill PJ, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR (2012) Direct vertebral body derotation, thoracoplasty or both: which is better with respect to inclinometer and SRS-22 scores? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824a4911

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2224–2231. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Senaran H, Shah SA, Gabos PG, Littleton AG, Neiss G, Guille JT (2008) Difficult thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:187–191. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318073cc1d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1602–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tao F, Zhao Y, Wu Y, Xie Y, Li M, Lu Y, Pan F, Guo F, Li F (2010) The effect of differing spinal fusion instrumentation on the occurrence of postoperative crankshaft phenomenon in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:e75–e80. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d38f63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lenke L, Peskin M, Charles G, Kim Y (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1869–1874. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Westrick ER, Ward WT (2011) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S61–S68. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd87d5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Association pour le Développement des Recherches Biologiques et Médicales (A. DE.RE.M).

Conflict of interest

JL Jouve consultant Zimmer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Blondel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blondel, B., Lafage, V., Schwab, F. et al. Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after posterior fusion in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21, 1964–1971 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2399-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2399-4

Keywords

Navigation