Skip to main content
Log in

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (SE-EPI-DWI) in differentiation between vertebral osteoporotic fractures and pathological neoplastic fractures.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three patients with both osteoporotic or neoplastic vertebral fractures diagnosed with X-ray or TC were studied with MRI exam, (1.5 T unit) with DWI sequences. DWI sequences were qualitatively analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also determined and compared to the definitive histologic diagnosis.

Results

DWI of neoplastic lesions showed hyperintensity signal in 22 out of 23 cases. Mean ADC value of neoplastic fractures was 1.241 ± 0.4 × 10−3 mm2/s; mean ADC value of osteoporotic fractures was 0.646 ± 0.368 × 10−3 mm2/s. Neoplastic fractures showed ADC values significantly higher than osteoporotic ones (p < 0.001). DWI imaging and histology showed a significant correlation.

Conclusion

DWI provides reliable information to support MRI diagnosis of neoplastic versus osteoporotic fractures. ADC value appears as a useful adjunctive parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malawer MM, Delaney T (1993) Treatment of metastatic cancer to bone. In: VTD, Vincent T, Hellman S et al (eds) Cancer: principle and practice of oncology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 2225–2245

  2. Fornasier VL, Czitrom AA (1978) Collapsed vertebrae: a review of 659 autopsies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 131:261–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratanatharathorn V, Powers WE (1991) Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: diagnosis and guidelines for management. Cancer Treat Rev 18(1):55–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frager D, Elkin C, Swerdlow M et al (1988) Subacute osteoporotic compression fracture: misleading magnetic resonance appearance. Skeletal Radiol 17(2):123–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuh WT, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ et al (1989) Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 172(1):215–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C et al (1995) Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine 20(16):1776–1782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I et al (1990) Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 174(2):495–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palmer WE, Suri R, Kattapuram SV (1999) Benign versus malignant vertebral collapse: value of a fracture line on MR images. Radiology (Suppl):213–293

  9. Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S et al (2002) Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 225(3):730–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan SB, Kozak JA, Mawad ME (1991) The limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pathologic vertebral fractures. Spine 16(8):919–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine 20(23):2499–2503 (discussion 2504)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Bihan DJ, Turner R (1992) Diffusion and perfusion. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG Jr (eds) Magnetic resonance imaging, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 335–371

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Bihan D, Douek P, Argyropoulou M et al (1993) Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumors. Top Magn Reson Imaging 5(1):25–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J et al (1990) Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology 177(2):407–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bammer R, Fazekas F (2003) Diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord and the vertebral column. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14(6):461–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R et al (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 207(2):349–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):351–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE (1965) Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 42(1):288–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baur A, Stäbler A, Brüning R et al (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 207(2):349–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK et al (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(5):948–953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Spuentrup E, Bruecker A, Adam G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):351–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baur A, Huber A, Dürr HK et al (2002) Differentiation of benign osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures with a diffusion-weighted, steady-state free precession sequence. Rofo 174(1):70–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abanoz R, Hakyemez B, Parlak M (2003) Diffusion-weighted imaging of acute vertebral compression: differential diagnosis of benign versus malignant pathologic fractures. Tani Girisim Radyol 9(2):176–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hackländer T, Scharwächter C, Golz R et al (2006) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing vertebral metastases due to prostate cancer in comparison to other primary tumors. Rofo Fortschr Röntgenstr 178:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Byun WM, Shin SO, Chang Y et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of metastatic disease of the spine: assessment of response to therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(6):906–912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dietrich O, Biffar A, Reiser MF et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 13(2):134–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Pozzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozzi, G., Garcia Parra, C., Stradiotti, P. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 1), 123–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2227-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2227-x

Keywords

Navigation