Abstract
Purpose
Vertebroplasty and more recently kyphoplasty are recognized as techniques in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and in case of pathological fracture like in secondary tumors. The recent introduction of calcium phosphate cement (CPC) that offers, at least theoretically, an osteointegrative capacity, absent in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), has generated interest for its use in the treatment of traumatic fractures (type A) even in young patients.
Methods
In this study, type A fractures without neurological signs were treated. A total of six male patients, of age between 21 and 55 years (mean age 38 years), were included. Fracture treatment was performed with kyphoplasty with balloon (Kyphon) and injection of calcium phosphate cement for a total of seven procedures.
Results
The results were evaluated according to the regional kyphosis angle and the local kyphosis angle. The postoperative X-ray control showed an average improvement of the regional kyphosis angle of 7.4°; however, this value was reduced by an average of 6.6° after 45 days with regard to the postoperative control. The local kyphosis angle showed an average improvement of 9° at the postoperative control with an average worsening of 9.2° in the control after 45 days.
Conclusions
While kyphoplasty with the use of CPC in the treatment of type A traumatic fractures was effective in the treatment of pain, it has not been so far effective concerning the maintenance of the reduction obtained intra-operatively and its osteointegrative effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khanna AJ et al (2006) Functional outcomes of kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic and osteolytic vertebral compression fracture. OsteoporosInt 17(6):817–826
Turner TM et al (2008) Vertebroplasty comparing injectable calcium phosphate cement compared with polymetylmethacrylate in a unique canine vertebral body large defect model. Spine J 8(3):482–487
Magerl F et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201
Trivedi JM (2002) Spinal trauma therapy options and outcomes. Eur J Radiol 42:127–134
Perry A et al (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. Spine J 5(5):489–493
Grafe IA et al (2008) Calcium-phosphate and polymethylmethacrylate cement in long-term outcome after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Spine (Phila) 33(11):1284–1290
Maestretti G et al (2007) Prospective study of stand alone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J 16:601–610
Heo DH, Kuh SU (2007) Progressive, repeated lumbar compression fracture at the same level after vertebral kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 6(6):559–562
Piazzolla A, De Giorgi G, Solarino G (2011) Vertebral body recollapse without trauma after kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement. Muscoloskelet Surg 95(2):141–145
Blattert TR, Jestaedt L, Weckbach A (2009) Suitability of calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate. Spine (Phila) 34(2):108–114
Wilke et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cycling loading. Spine (Phila) 3(25):2934–2141
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gioia, G., Mandelli, D. & Gogue, R. Treatment of typical amyelic somatic fractures with kyphoplasty and calcium phosphate cement: a critical analysis. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 1), 108–111 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2225-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2225-z