Abstract
We retrospectively evaluated 488 percutaneous pedicle screws in 110 consecutive patients that had undergone minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and its relevant risk factors. Screw placements were classified based on postoperative computed tomographic findings as “correct”, “cortical encroachment” or as “frank penetration”. Age, gender, body mass index, bone mineral density, diagnosis, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), level of fusion, surgeon’s position, spinal alignment, quality/quantity of multifidus muscle, and depth to screw entry point were considered to be demographic and anatomical variables capable of affecting pedicle screw placement. Pedicle dimensions, facet joint arthritis, screw location (ipsilateral or contralateral), screw length, screw diameter, and screw trajectory angle were regarded as screw-related variables. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine relations between these variables and the correctness of screw placement. The incidence of cortical encroachment was 12.5% (61 screws), and frank penetration was found for 54 (11.1%) screws. Two patients (0.4%) with medial penetration underwent revision for unbearable radicular pain and foot drop, respectively. The odds ratios of significant risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement were 3.373 (95% CI 1.095–10.391) for obesity, 1.141 (95% CI 1.024–1.271) for pedicle convergent angle, 1.013 (95% CI 1.006–1.065) for EBL >400 cc, and 1.003 (95% CI 1.000–1.006) for cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle. Although percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws was performed safely during MITLIF, several risk factors should be considered to improve placement accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gaines RW Jr (2000) The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1458–1476
Yahiro MA (1994) Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2274S–2278S
Su BW, Kim PD, Cha TD, Lee J, April EW, Weidenbaum M, Vaccaro AR (2009) An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1355–1362. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181
Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N (2007) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 16:613–617. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0221-x
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E111–E120. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024
Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240
Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:606–614
Magerl FP (1984) Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res:125–141
Olerud S, Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G, Hamberg M (1986) Spontaneous effect of increased stability of the lower lumbar spine in cases of severe chronic back pain. The answer of an external transpeduncular fixation test. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:67–74
Soini J, Slatis P, Kannisto M, Sandelin J (1993) External transpedicular fixation test of the lumbar spine correlates with the outcome of subsequent lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293:89–96
Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97:7–12
Harris EB, Massey P, Lawrence J, Rihn J, Vaccaro A, Anderson DG (2008) Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Focus 25:E12. doi:10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E12
Kader DF, Wardlaw D, Smith FW (2000) Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol 55:145–149. doi:10.1053/crad.1999
Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1987) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164:227–230
Learch TJ, Massie JB, Pathria MN, Ahlgren BA, Garfin SR (2004) Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 29:767–773. doi:00007632-200404010-00011
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Wiesner L, Kothe R, Ruther W (1999) Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 24:1599–1603
Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Robinson M, Polly DW Jr (2002) Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws in patients with and without coronal plane spinal deformities. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 27:1558–1566. doi:00007632-200207150-00015[pii]
Telfeian AE, Reiter GT, Durham SR, Marcotte P (2002) Spine surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Neurosurg 97:20–24
Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S, Maltenfort MG, Deutsch H, Vaccaro AR, Harrop J, Sharan A, Ratliff JK (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6:291–297. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.1
Zheng F, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Girardi FP, Khan SN (2002) Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 27:818–824
Rosen DS, Ferguson SD, Ogden AT, Huo D, Fessler RG (2008) Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 63:956–960. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194 (discussion 960)
Park P, Upadhyaya C, Garton HJ, Foley KT (2008) The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients. Neurosurgery 62:693–699. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000317318.33365 (discussion 693–699)
Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Sztern B (2004) An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period. Eur Spine J 13(Suppl 1):S18–S27. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0752-y
Carl A, Kaufman E, Lawrence J (2010) Complications in spinal deformity surgery: issues unrelated directly to intraoperative technical skills. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 35:2215–2223. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, MC., Chung, HT., Cho, JL. et al. Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20, 1635–1643 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1892-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1892-5