Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late-developing infection following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is a retrospective case series review of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who were revised more than 1 year after the index procedure, due to a late-developing deep wound infection, to determine onset, bacteriology, possible influence of implant alloy (titanium vs. stainless-steel) and treatment outcome of patients. From a total of 540 patients who underwent posterior-only fusion for AIS from 1993 through 2005 at our institution, 15 cases (2.77%) were revised due to a late-developing post-operative infection: there were six males and nine females, with an average age at initial surgery of 15.8 years (range 12–18). Late infections occurred at a mean of 70 months (15–95) after the index procedure. The implant alloy used was a stainless-steel instrumentation in 11 patients (4.56% of 241) and a titanium one in 4 patients (1.33% of 299): there was an higher incidence of late infections in stainless-steel alloy group of patients (P < 0.0001). Complete removal of instrumentation was performed in nine patients, obtaining in all cases wound healing and no symptoms of infection, at a minimum 3 years follow-up. In the other six patients, presenting less severe clinical signs of infections, an attempt to save/replace the previous instrumentation was performed, but a complete instrumentation removal had to be performed 11.6 months later (range 3–24) for the persistence or recurrence of infection: all patients healed uneventfully at a minimum 3 years follow-up. Intraoperative cultures were obtained in all 15 cases, being positive in 13 cases (S. epidermidis in 5 patients, S. aureus in 3, Propionibacterium acnes in 1, Serratia marcescens in 1, Propionibacterium acnes + S. epidermidis in 1, S. aureus + S. epidermidis in 1 and coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 1). None presented at latest follow-up scoliosis progression: there was no statistically significant difference between final and pre-operative revision surgery values (P = 0.17). In conclusion, treatment of late-developing post-operative infection in AIS surgery required complete removal of the implant, continuous drain and adequate antibiotic therapy based on intraoperative swab antibiogram. Titanium alloy instrumentations resulted less subject to late post-operative infections, when compared to stainless-steel ones (P < 0.0001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark CE, Shufflebarger HL (1999) Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 18:1909–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 14:783–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho C, Skaggs DL, Weiss JM, Tolo VT (2007) Management of spinal infections in pediatric scoliosis. Spine 32(24):2739–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeWald R (2003) Spinal deformities: the comprehensive text. Thieme, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ho C, Sucato DJ, Richards BS (2007) Risk factors for the development of delayed infections following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine 32(20):2272–2277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heggeness MH, Esses SI, Errico T et al (1993) Late infection of spinal instrumentation by hematogenous seeding. Spine 18:492–496

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubousset J, Shufflebarger HL, Wenger D (1994) Late “infection” with CD instrumentation. Orthop Trans [Abstract] 18:121

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richards BS (1995) Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:524–529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soultanis K, Mantelos G, Pagiatakis A et al (2003) Late infection in patients with scoliosis treated with spinal instrumentation. Clin Orthop 411:116–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gristina AG, Kolkin J (1985) Current concept review: total joint replacement and sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg 67:264–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mody DR, Esses SI, Heggeness MH (1994) A histological study of soft-tissue reactions to spinal implants. Spine 19:1153–1156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wimmer C, Gluch H, Jenenko R (1997) Aseptic loosening following C-D instrumentation in treatment of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 79B(suppl 3):324

    Google Scholar 

  13. Atkins BA, Lallo DG, Wilson-McDonald J et al (1998) Late presentation of infection in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 80B(suppl 2):205

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richards BS, Emara KM (2001) Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: revisited. Spine 26:1990–1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz FR, Koontz FP, Found EM, Marsh JL (1991) The importance of positive bacterial cultures of specimens obtained during clean orthopaedic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(8):1200–1207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schofferman L, Zucherman J, Schofferman J et al (1991) Diphtheroids and associated infections as a cause of failed instrument stabilization procedures in the lumbar spine. Spine 16:356–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lenke L, Betz R, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS Instr Course Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hedequist D, Haugen A, Hresko T, Emans J (2009) Failure of attempted implant retention in spinal deformity delayed surgical site infections. Spine 34(1):60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muschik M, Luck W, Schlenzka D (2004) Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction. A retrospective analysis of 45 cases. Eur Spine J 13(7):645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Potter BK, Kirk KL, Shah SA et al (2006) Loss of coronal correction following instrumentation removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rathjen K, Wood M, McClung A, Vest Z (2007) Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32:2184–2188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rihn JA, Lee JY, Ward WT (2008) Infection after the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of the diagnosis, treatment, and impact on clinical outcomes. Spine 33:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soultanis K, Pyrovolou N et al (2006) Instrumentation loosening and material of implants as predisposal factors for late postoperative infections in operated idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inf 123:559–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim TI, Han JH et al (1997) New titanium alloys for biomaterials: a study of mechanical and corrosion properties and cytotoxicity. Biomed Mater Eng 7(4):253–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheehan E, McKenna J, Mulhall KJ, Marks P, McCormack D (2004) Adhesion of Staphylococcus to orthopaedic metals, an in vivo study. J Orthop Res 22(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kodama T (1989) [Study on biocompatibility of titanium alloys]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 56(2):263–288

  28. Linder L, Lundskog J (1975) Incorporation of stainless steel, titanium and vitallium in bone. Injury 6(4):277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pohler OE (2000) Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery. Injury 31(Suppl 4):7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Di Silvestre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silvestre, M.D., Bakaloudis, G., Lolli, F. et al. Late-developing infection following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20 (Suppl 1), 121–127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1754-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1754-1

Keywords

Navigation