Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to develop a short prediction questionnaire for estimating the risk of no return to work (RTW) within 3 months of sick leave to facilitate triage and management of a patient population of subacute low-back pain (LBP) sufferers. We conducted a prospective study with a 3-month follow-up on 186 patients with LBP introducing a claim for sickness benefits to the largest sickness fund in Belgium. Patients completed a screening questionnaire within 2 weeks after claim submission. All patients were invited for clinical assessment, at 6–8 weeks of sick leave, by the medical adviser. Patients’ work status was recorded by the sickness fund. About 20% of the patients did not resume work at 3 months’ sick leave. They were more likely to experience pain below the knee, to have an own previous prediction of a 100% no RTW and to have a severe interference of pain on daily activities. The screening tool based on these three items correctly classified 73.7% of the non-resumers and 78.4% of the resumers at a cut-off score of 0.22. The findings of this study provide evidence of the utility of a short screening questionnaire for future use in intervention studies in a social security setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boersma K, Linton SJ (2005) Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain 21(1):38–43; Discussion 69–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borkan J, Van Tulder M, Reis S, Schoene ML, Croft P, Hermoni D (2002) Advances in the field of low back pain in primary care: a report from the fourth international forum. Spine 27(5):E128–E132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S (2002) Early claimant cohort prognostic modelling group. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes—a prospective study. CMAJ 166(6):749–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donceel P, Du Bois M (1999) Predictors for work incapacity continuing after disc surgery. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(3):264–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekman M, Johnell O, Lidgren L (2005) The economic cost of low back pain in Sweden in 2001. Acta Orthop 76(2):275–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faber E, Burdorf A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Miedema HS, Koes BW (2006) Determinants for improvement in different back pain measures and their influence on the duration of sickness absence. Spine 31(13):1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Brox JI (2006) Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the acute low back pain screening questionnaire. Clin J Pain 22(5):458–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson E, Hansson T, Jonsson R (2006) Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems. Eur Spine J 15(6):780–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jellema P, van der Windt DA, van der Horst HE, Blankenstein AH, Bouter LM, Stalman WA (2005) Why is a treatment aimed at psychosocial factors not effective in patients with (sub)acute low back pain? Pain 5;118(3):350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krismer M, van Tulder M (2007) The low back pain group of the bone and joint health strategies for Europe project. Strategies for prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Low back pain (non-specific). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(1):77–91. Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuijer W, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU (2006) Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 16(3):439–467. Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Lehmann KK (1993) Predicting long-term disability in low back injured workers presenting to a spine consultant. Spine 15;18(8):1103–1112

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linton SJ, Boersma K (2003) Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem:the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain 19(2):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R (2002) The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil 12(4):223–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16(1):23–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Fank JW (2001) Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ 165(2):174–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Norrefalk JR, Ekholm J, Borg K (2006) Ethnic background does not influence outcome for return-to-work in work-related interdisciplinary rehabilitation for long-term pain: 1- and 3-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med 38(2):87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinnington MA, Miller J, Stanley I (2004) An evaluation of prompt access to physiotherapy in the management of low back pain in primary care. Fam Pract 21(4):372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandstrom J, Esbjornsson E (1986) Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient’s own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 18(1):29–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sizer PS Jr, Brismee JM, Cook C (2007) Medical screening for red flags in the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal spine pain. Pain Pract 7(1):53–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C, Cukier D (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 15;19(2):129–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steenstra IA, Koopman FS, Knol DL, Kat E, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W (2005) Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionals. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):591–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM (2005) Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med 62(12):851–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turk DC (1997) The role of demographic and psychosocial factors in transition from acute to chronic pain. Volume 8. In: Jensen TS, Turner JA, WH Z (eds) IASP Press, Seattle, pp 185–213

  25. Tveito TH, Hysing M, Eriksen HR (2004) Low back pain interventions at the workplace: a systematic literature review. Occup Med 54(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 11;340(6):418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Waddell G, Burton AK (2001) Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med 51(2):124–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/5, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Marc Du Bois & Peter Donceel

Authors
  1. Marc Du Bois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Donceel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Donceel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du Bois, M., Donceel, P. A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants. Eur Spine J 17, 380–385 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation