Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in LSS and different positions as well as loading status, using the treadmill device. The study was a prospective clinical trial on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using a treadmill equipment. The study population comprised of 80 LSS patients with a mean age of 61. The equipment included a treadmill, unloading station and loading vests. The patients were instructed to walk in five different positions. The initiation time of symptoms and total walking time were recorded. The examination was stopped after 20 min or at the onset of severe symptoms. In order to obtain pretest demographic data on subjects, visual analog scale, Roland–Morris questionnaire, pain disability index, and Beck depression index were used. The initiation time of symptoms (ITS) and total walking time (TWT) were measured during the test. Unloading provided a longer and loading a shorter ITS and TWT. Decline or incline positions did not affect ITS or TWT. The changes in posture had no correlation with the appearance of symptoms in LSS patients with NIC on a treadmill in this study, rather ITS and TWT were determined by axial loading and unloading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal HJ, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20(10):1178–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM (2000) Test–retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 75:1002–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deen HG, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM (1998) Use of the exercise treadmill to measure baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 23:244–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong GX, Porter RW (1989) Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine 14(9):965–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fritz JM, Erhard RE, Delitto A, Welch WC, Nowakowski PE, Nowakowski PE (1997) Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 10(5):410–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritz JM, Erhard RE, Vignovic M (1997) A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther 77(9):962–973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP, Karaharju EO (1993) Intercorelation and test–retest reability of the pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis, critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77-A:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herzog RJ, Kaiser JA, Saal JA, Saal JS (1991) The importance of posterior epidural fat pad in lumbar central canal stenosis. Spine 16(Suppl):227S–233S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, Hasegawa T, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion–extension movement. Spine 21:2412–2420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iversen MD, Katz JN (2001) Examination findings and self-reported walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther 81:1296–1306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen OH, Schmidt-Olsen S (1989) a new functional test in the diagnostic evaluation of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Clin Rheumatol 8:363–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Joffe D, Watkins M, Steiner L, Pfeifer BA (2002) Treadmill ambulation with partial body weight support for the treatment of low back and leg pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32(5):202–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Pettersson H (1981) Analysis of operated cases with lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Scand 52:427–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part 1: clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine 22: 2932–2937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kucukdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, Niyazoglu H (2001) Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine 26(24):2738–2743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Onel D, Sari H, Dönmez C (1993) Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients. Spine 18:291–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penning L (1992) Functional pathology of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Biomech 7:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Penning L, Wilmink JT (1987) Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4–L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. Spine 2(5):491

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schonstrom N, Lindahl S, Willen J, Hansson T (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7:115–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, Matsui T, Tomita K (1995) Epidural pressure measurements: relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:650–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: an attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wade DT (1990) Measures of emotion and social interaction. In: Measurement neurological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 259–284

  24. Willen J, Danielson B, Gaulitz A, Niklason T, Schonstrom N, Hansson T (1997) Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal. Spine 24:2968–2976

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Funda Levendoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oğuz, H., Levendoğlu, F., Öğün, T.C. et al. Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment. Eur Spine J 16, 913–918 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0317-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0317-y

Keywords

Navigation