Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present survival, neurological function, and complications in a consecutive series of 282 patients operated for spinal metastases from January 1990 to December 2001. Our main surgical indication throughout this time period was neurological deficit rather than pain. Metastases from cancer of the prostate accounted for 40%, breast 15%, kidney 8%, and lung 7%. In 78% the level of decompression was thoracic and lumbar in 22%. Thirteen percent had a single metastases only, 64% had multiple skeletal metastases, and 23% had non-skeletal metastases also. Preoperatively 64% were non-walkers (Frankel A-C), 30% could walk with aids (Frankel D) and 8% had normal motor function (Frankel E). Posterior decompression and stabilization was applied in 212 patients, 47 had laminectomy only, and 23 had anterior decompressions and reconstruction. Complications were recorded at a level of 20%, and systemic complications were often associated with early death. The survival rate was 0.63 at 3 months, 0.47 at 6 months, 0.30 at 1 year, and 0.16 at 2  years. Twelve of 255 (5%) patients with motor deficits were worsened postoperatively, whereas 179 (70%) improved at least one Frankel grade. The ability to walk postoperatively was retained during follow-up in more than 80% of the patients. This study shows that important improvement of function can be gained by surgical treatment, but the complication rate was high and many patients died of their disease within the first months of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M (2003) Spinal metastasis in the elderly. Eur Spine J 12 (Suppl 2):S202–S213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer HC (1997) Posterior decompression and stabilization for spinal metastases: analysis of sixty-seven consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:514–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer HCF, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases: prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66:143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bone Pain Trial Working Party (1999) 8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic skeletal pain: randomised comparison with a multifraction schedule over 12 months of patient follow-up. Radiother Oncol 52:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton D, Hills M (1993) Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis LA, Warren SA, Reid DC, Oberle K, Saboe LA, Grace MAG (1993) Incomplete neural deficits in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures. Spine 18:257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Finkelstein JA, Zaveri G, Wai E, Vidmar M, Kreder H, Chow E (2003) A population-based study of surgery for spinal metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1045–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G et al (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 7:179–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrington KD (1988) Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy. Clin Orthop 227:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee CK, Rosa R, Fernand R (1986) Surgical treatment of tumors of the spine. Spine 11:201–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loblaw AD, Laperriere NJ (1998) Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: An evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol 16:1613–1624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Obermair A, Handisurya A, Kaider A, Sevelda P, Kolbl H, Gitsch G (1998) The relationship of pretreatment serum hemoglobin level to the survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients: a prospective review. Cancer 83:726–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pointillart, Ravaud A, Palussière J (2002) Vertebral metastases. Springer, Berlin Heiddberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Regine WF, Tibbs PA, Young A, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio RJ et al. (2003) Metastatic spinal cord compression: a randomized trial of direct decompressive surgical resection plus radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57(Suppl 2):125

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rompe JD, Hopf CG, Eysel P (1999) Outcome after palliative posterior surgery for metastatic disease of the spine-evaluation of 106 consecutive patients after decompression and stabilization with the Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:394–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steenland E, Leer J, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit et al (1999) The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analyses of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiotherapy Oncol 52:101–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sundaresan N, Rothman A, Manhart K, Kelliher (2002) Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine: rationale and results of treatment. Spine 27:1802–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundaresan N, Sachdev VP, Holland JF, Moore F, Sung M, Paciucci PA et al (1995) Surgical treatment of spinal cord compression from epidural metastasis. J Clin Oncol 13:2330–2335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S, Kawano H, Ohssaka S (1990) Scoring system for preoperative evaluation or metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 15:1110–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26:298–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wedin R, Bauer HFC, Skoog L, Söderlund V, Tani E (2000) Cytological diagnosis of skeletal lesions. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in 110 tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:673–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenger M (2003) Vertebroplasty for metastasis. Med Oncol 20:203–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wise JJ, Fishgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D, Kurz LT (1999) Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine 24:1943–1951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik C. F. Bauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansson, KÅ., Bauer, H.C.F. Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 15, 196–202 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0870-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0870-6

Keywords

Navigation