Skip to main content
Log in

A pilot study to assess adductor canal catheter tip migration in a cadaver model

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An adductor canal catheter may facilitate early ambulation after total knee arthroplasty, but there is concern over preoperative placement since intraoperative migration of catheters may occur from surgical manipulation and result in ineffective analgesia. We hypothesized that catheter type and subcutaneous tunneling may influence tip migration for preoperatively inserted adductor canal catheters. In a male unembalmed human cadaver, 20 catheter insertion trials were divided randomly into one of four groups: flexible epidural catheter either tunneled or not tunneled; or rigid stimulating catheter either tunneled or not tunneled. Intraoperative patient manipulation was simulated by five range-of-motion exercises of the knee. Distance and length measurements were performed by a blinded regional anesthesiologist. Changes in catheter tip to nerve distance (p = 0.225) and length of catheter within the adductor canal (p = 0.467) were not different between the four groups. Two of five non-tunneled stimulating catheters (40 %) were dislodged compared to 0/5 in all other groups (p = 0.187). A cadaver model may be useful for assessing migration of regional anesthesia catheters; catheter type and subcutaneous tunneling may not affect migration of adductor canal catheters based on this preliminary study. However, future studies involving a larger sample size, actual patients, and other catheter types are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Mudumbai S, Kim T, Howard S, Workman J, Giori N, Woolson S, Ganaway T, King R, Mariano ER. Continuous adductor canal blocks are superior to continuous femoral nerve blocks in promoting early ambulation after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jæger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sørensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:14–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jenstrup MT, Jæger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:357–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1013–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJK, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:409–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariano ER, Chu LF, Peinado CR, Mazzei WJ. Anesthesia-controlled time and turnover time for ambulatory upper extremity surgery performed with regional versus general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:253–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariano ER, Lehr M, Loland V, Bishop M. Choice of loco-regional anesthetic technique affects operating room efficiency for carpal tunnel release. J. Anesthesiol. 2013;27:611–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kan J, Harrison T, Kim T, Howard S, Kou A, Mariano E. An in vitro study to evaluate the utility of the “air test” to infer perineural catheter tip location. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:529–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:904–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Symons B, Wuest S, Leonard T, Herzog W. Biomechanical characterization of cervical spinal manipulation in living subjects and cadavers. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22:747–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gofeld M, Krashin D, Ahn S. Needle echogenicity in ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injections: a cadaveric study. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E725–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orebaugh SL, Mukalel JJ, Krediet AC, Weimer J, Filip P, McFadden K, Bigeleisen PE. Brachial plexus root injection in a human cadaver model: injectate distribution and effects on the neuraxis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:525–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaur B, Tang R, Sawka A, Krebs C, Vaghadia H. A method for ultrasonographic visualization and injection of the superior laryngeal nerve: volunteer study and cadaver simulation. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1242–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Russell Sanchez and the pathology service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mariano has received unrestricted educational program funding paid to his institution from I-Flow (Lake Forest, CA, USA) and B Braun (Bethlehem, PA, USA). These companies had absolutely no input into any aspect of the present study conceptualization, design, and implementation, data collection, analysis and interpretation, or manuscript preparation. None of the other authors has any personal financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward R. Mariano.

Additional information

Congress presentations: 39th Annual regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine meeting and workshops, (Chicago, IL, USA, April 3–6, 2014).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leng, J.C., Harrison, T.K., Miller, B. et al. A pilot study to assess adductor canal catheter tip migration in a cadaver model. J Anesth 29, 308–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1922-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1922-7

Keywords

Navigation