Abstract
Purpose
Cultural views are purported to be critical barriers to the use of epidural anesthesia during childbirth in Japan, even though it is not routinely available. We sought to understand the importance of the asserted cultural barriers for Japanese women living in Michigan in the United States where access to epidural anesthesia is routine.
Methods
We used a mixed-methods approach including self-administered, cross-sectional mail surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were Japanese women who received prenatal care at the University of Michigan Japanese Family Health Program.
Results
Of 78 participants in the mail survey, 63% used epidural anesthesia. Positive influences to have epidural anesthesia came from friends (58%), husbands (42%), and knowledge of the epidural anesthesia experiences of others (50%). Seventeen respondents participated in qualitative interviews. Most had learned little about epidural anesthesia while living in Japan, and some respondents had heard unsettling rumors. Many mentioned obtaining their first detailed knowledge about epidural anesthesia from friends in the United States, and expressed fear or concerns about the side effects of anesthesia. Thirteen out of fourteen interviewed participants who used or wanted epidural anesthesia expressed a desire to use it for the next childbirth.
Conclusions
While Japanese women in this United States setting considered previously reported cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia for birth pain, many chose to have it during their labor. This finding implicates limited access as a barrier at least as important as cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia use in Japan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leeman L, Fontaine P, King V, Klein MC, Ratcliffe S. The nature and management of labor pain: part II. Pharmacologic pain relief. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:1115–20.
Marmor TR, Krol DM. Labor pain management in the United States: understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S173–80.
Fetters MD. Infrequent use of epidural anesthesia during labor by Japanese women. Med Hum Rep. 1999;20:1.
Yeo S, Fetters MD, Maeda Y. Japanese couples’ childbirth experiences in Michigan: implications for care. Birth. 2000;27:191–8.
Tanabe K. The cultural significance of the ‘Pain of Childbirth’: ethnography of people who have preferred ‘Natural Childbirth’. Nihon Hoken-iryou Koudou-kagakukai Nenpou (Ann Rep Jpn Acad Health Behav Sci). 2006;21:94–109 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Mitka M. The bridge at Ann Arbor: Japanese health program. Acad Med. 2000;283:2921–2.
Tobin J. Six thousand four hundred miles from home. Medicine at Michigan. 2005 Fall:31-5.
Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:7–12.
Creswell JW, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2011.
Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
Fetters MD, Yoshioka T, Greenberg GM, Gorenflo DW, Yeo S. Advance consent in Japanese during prenatal care for epidural anesthesia during childbirth. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:333–65.
Dillman DA. Mail and other self-administered questionnaires, chap. 10. In: Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB, editors. Handbook for survey research. New York: Academic Press; 1983. p. 359–77.
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990. p. 145–98.
Waitzkin H. On studying the discourse of medical encounters. A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and a proposal for reasonable compromise. Med Care. 1990;28:473–88.
Creswell JW. Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data, chap. 9. In: Benson AC, editor. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall; 2005. p. 256–83.
Trotter RT, Schensul JJ. Methods in applied anthropology. In: Bernard HR, editor. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press; 1998. p. 691–735.
Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Clinical research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005. p. 605–39.
Okutomi T, Minakawa M. The reason why childbirth under anesthesia is not popular in Japan. Bunben to Masui (J Obstet Anesth). 2000;79:9–17 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Nagaya K, Fetters MD, Ishikawa M, Kubo T, Koyanagi T, Saito Y, Sameshima H, Sugimoto M, Takagi K, Chiba Y, Honda H, Mukubo M, Kawamura M, Satoh S, Neki R. Causes of maternal mortality in Japan. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:2661–7.
Long SO. Public passages, personal passages, and reluctant passages: notes on investigating cancer disclosure practices in Japan. J Med Humanit. 2000;21:3–13.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their thanks to Toyota Motor Corporation and Jitsukoukai Medical Foundation for financial support helping make this research possible; Dr. Grant Greenberg for assistance with recruiting; and Daniel Gorenflo, Ph.D., for assistance with data entry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshioka, T., Yeo, S. & Fetters, M.D. Experiences with epidural anesthesia of Japanese women who had childbirth in the United States. J Anesth 26, 326–333 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1328-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1328-3