Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous biliary drainage is oncologically inferior to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis in resectable distal cholangiocarcinoma

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) increases the incidence of seeding metastasis and shortens postoperative survival compared with endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD).

Methods

A total of 376 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy following either PTBD (n = 189) or EBD (n = 187) at 30 hospitals between 2001 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Seeding metastasis was defined as peritoneal/pleural dissemination and PTBD sinus tract recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses followed by propensity score matching analysis were performed to adjust the data for the baseline characteristics between the two groups.

Results

The overall survival of the PTBD group was significantly shorter than that of the EBD group (34.2 % vs 48.8 % at 5 years; P = 0.003); multivariate analysis showed that the type of biliary drainage was an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.036) and seeding metastasis (P = 0.001). After two new cohorts with 82 patients each has been generated after 1:1 propensity score matching, the overall survival rate in the PTBD group was significantly less than that in the EBD group (34.7 % vs 52.5 % at 5 years, P = 0.017). The estimated recurrence rate of seeding metastasis was significantly higher in the PTBD group than in the EBD group (30.7 % vs 10.7 % at 5 years, P = 0.006), whereas the recurrence rates at other sites were similar between the two groups (P = 0.579).

Conclusions

Compared with EBD, PTBD increases the incidence of seeding metastasis after resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma and shortens postoperative survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iacono C, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks. Ann Surg. 2013;257:191–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:129–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg. 2002;236:17–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Umeda J, Itoi T. Current status of preoperative biliary drainage. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:940–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jinkins LJ, Parmar AD, Han Y, et al. Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2013;154:179–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ngu W, Jones M, Neal CP, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for distal biliary obstruction and post-operative infectious complications. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H, et al. Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:601–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SY, Park CH, Cho SB, et al. What is appropriate procedure for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice awaiting pancreaticoduodenectomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2011;21:344–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagino M, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction of the hepatic confluence. Hepatogastroenterology. 1992;39:296–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagino M, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:789–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawakami H, Kondo S, Kuwatani M, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: which stent should be selected? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:630–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E, et al. Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg. 2013;257:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujii T, Yamada S, Suenaga M, et al. Preoperative internal biliary drainage increases the risk of bile juice infection and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective observational study. Pancreas. 2015;44:465–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanai M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Preoperative intrahepatic segmental cholangitis in patients with advanced carcinoma involving the hepatic hilus. Surgery. 1996;119:498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang S, Song GW, Ha TY, et al. Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tract recurrence after resection of perihilar bile duct cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang MJ, Choi YS, Jang JY, et al. Catheter tract recurrence after percutaneous biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2013;37:437–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T, et al. Catheter tract implantation metastases associated with percutaneous biliary drainage for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:7024–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1860–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T, et al. Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:533–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of biliary tract (in Japanese). 3rd ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of the biliary tract (in Japanese). 5th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Inoue K, et al. Pleural dissemination as a complication of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2001;31:174–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:757–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uemura K, Murakami Y, Satoi S, et al. Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on long-term survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter observational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4618-9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hattori M, Nagino M, Ebata T, et al. Prospective study of biliary cytology in suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2011;98:704–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsuchiya T, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, et al. Randomized controlled trial on timing and number of sampling for bile aspiration cytology. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Radical second resection provides survival benefit for patients with T2 gallbladder carcinoma first discovered after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2002;26:867–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y, et al. Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heimbach JK, Sanchez W, Rosen CB, et al. Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:356–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Takahashi Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Surgery for recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single-center experience with 74 consecutive resections. Ann Surg. 2015;262:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ishii K, Itoi T, Tonozuka R, et al. Balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and intact papillae (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.020.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hamada T, Yasunaga H, Nakai Y, et al. Severe bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the biliary system: effect of antithrombotic agents—analysis of 34 606 cases from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. Radiology. 2015;274:605–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aoba T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: location, number, or ratio of involved nodes. Ann Surg. 2013;257:718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T, et al. Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2015;102:399–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg. 2013;258:129–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wiggers JK, Coelen RJ, Rauws EA, et al. Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (DRAINAGE trial): design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The following investigators of the Nagoya Surgical Oncology Group also participated in this study: T. Aoba (Toyohashi Municipal Hospital), Y. Kaneoka (Ogaki Municipal Hospital), T. Arai (Anjo Kosei Hospital), Y. Shimizu (Aichi Cancer Center Hospital), K. Shirai (Yamashita Hospital), S. Ohira (Handa City Hospital), Y. Tojima (Social Insurance Chukyo Hospital), N. Morofuji (The Gifu Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Kumiai Hospital), A. Akutagawa (Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital), R. Yamaguchi (Kasugai Municipal Hospital), T. Kawahara (Daido Hospital), S. Mizuno (Shizuoka Kosei Hospital), N. Matsumoto (Hekinan Municipal Hospital), S. Ota (Kani Tono Hospital), M. Takano (Asahi Rousai Hospital), H. Yamamoto (Tokai Hospital), M. Inoue (Tokoname City Hospital), Y. Asaba (Enshu Hospital), T. Watanabe (Chita City Hospital), M. Hashimoto (Chubu Rosai Hospital), S. Kawai (Tsushima City Hospital), K. Ikuta (Tokai Municipal Hospital), H. Matsubara (Yachiyo Hospital), and S. Kondo (Sakashita Hospital).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Nagino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komaya, K., Ebata, T., Fukami, Y. et al. Percutaneous biliary drainage is oncologically inferior to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis in resectable distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 51, 608–619 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-015-1140-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-015-1140-6

Keywords

Navigation