Skip to main content
Log in

Non-selective β-blockers improve the correlation of liver stiffness and portal pressure in advanced cirrhosis

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Liver stiffness (LS) correlates with portal pressure (hepatic venous pressure gradient, HVPG). However, the dynamic components of portal hypertension (PHT) in advanced cirrhosis may not be adequately assessed by TE. The influence of treatment with non-selective β-blockers (NSBB) on the correlation of HVPG and LS has not been investigated.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-two patients with esophageal varices were included. LS, hemodynamic parameters, and HVPG were recorded at baseline (BL) and after 6 weeks of treatment with NSBB (FU). The correlation of LS and HVPG was compared to control patients with HVPG ≤ 12 mmHg.

Results

Patients with higher Child-Pugh stages (A:88/B:25/C:9) had higher levels of liver stiffness (47.4 ± 16.5 vs. 70.3 ± 7.9 vs. 73.7 ± 2.1 kPa) and HVPG (21 ± 5 vs. 26 ± 5 vs. 26 ± 4 mmHg). The correlation of LS and HVPG was stronger in controls with HVPG ≤ 12 mmHg (R = 0.951; P < 0.0001) than in patients with HVPG > 12 mmHg (R = 0.538; P = 0.0004). The association of HVPG with LS became stronger under treatment with NSBB, which finally restored the linear correlation of HVPG and LS (R = 0.930; P < 0.0001). Forty-three percent (53/122) of patients were hemodynamic responders to NSBB. The improvement in the correlation of LS and HVPG under NSBB was mainly noted in hemodynamic responders (R = 0.864), but not in nonresponders (R = 0.535), whereas changes in LS, heart rate, and MAP were similar in responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions

Targeting the hyperdynamic circulation and the increased splanchnic blood inflow by treatment with NSBB unmasks the linear (mechanical) correlation of HVPG and LS in patients with HVPG > 12 mmHg. Measurement of LS by TE is not a feasible method to assess the dynamic components of PHT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC. Complications of cirrhosis. I. Portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2000;32(1 Suppl):141–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwakiri Y, Groszmann RJ. The hyperdynamic circulation of chronic liver diseases: from the patient to the molecule. Hepatology. 2006;43(2 Suppl 1):S121–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gatta A, Bolognesi M, Merkel C. Vasoactive factors and hemodynamic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Mol Aspects Med. 2008;29(1–2):119–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blei AT, Mazhar S, Davidson CJ, Flamm SL, Abecassis M, Gheorghiade M. Hemodynamic evaluation before liver transplantation: insights into the portal hypertensive syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41(Suppl 3):S323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Tsao G. Portal hypertension. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004;20(3):254–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(10):573–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO, Atterbury CE, Glickman M. Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 1985;5(3):419–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abraldes JG, Tarantino I, Turnes J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Rodes J, Bosch J. Hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and long-term prognosis of cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2003;37(4):902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merkel C, Bolognesi M, Sacerdoti D, et al. The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2000;32(5):930–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(5):1611–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(2):343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut. 2006;55(3):403–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bureau C, Metivier S, Peron JM, et al. Transient elastography accurately predicts presence of significant portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27(12):1261–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrion JA, Navasa M, Bosch J, Bruguera M, Gilabert R, Forns X. Transient elastography for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(12):1791–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG, et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(12):1705–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13, 369 examinations. Hepatology. 2010;51(3):828–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim JK, Groszmann RJ. Transient elastography for diagnosis of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis: is there still a role for hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement? Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1087–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peck-Radosavljevic M, Trauner M, Schreiber F. Austrian consensus on the definition and treatment of portal hypertension and its complications. Endoscopy. 2005;37(7):667–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology. 2004;39(2):280–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reiberger T, Rutter K, Ferlitsch A, et al. Portal pressure predicts outcome and safety of antiviral therapy in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(7):602–8.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010;52(2):206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by an unrestricted grant of MSD Austria (former Aesca Pharma, Vienna, Austria) to Prof. Dr. Markus Peck-Radosavljevic.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Peck-Radosavljevic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiberger, T., Ferlitsch, A., Payer, B.A. et al. Non-selective β-blockers improve the correlation of liver stiffness and portal pressure in advanced cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol 47, 561–568 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0517-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0517-4

Keywords

Navigation