Skip to main content
Log in

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in cholelithiasis coexisting with choledocholithiasis

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background

An accepted treatment strategy for cholelithiasis with secondary choledocholithiasis is the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). Although early cholecystectomy is advised, there is no consensus about the time interval between LC and ERCP. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the time interval between ERCP and ERCP on operation outcomes.

Methods

Patients with cholelithiasis and a risk of choledocholithiasis underwent ERCP. Patients were grouped as those operated on between 24 and 72 h after ERCP (group 1) and those operated on more than 72 h after ERCP (group 2). Patients’ age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, abdominal ultrasonography findings, white blood cell count, total serum bilirubin, ALP, amylase, ALT, AST, GGT levels, ERCP findings, time interval between ERCP and LC, conversion rate, median postoperative hospital stay, median operation time, intraoperative complication and postoperative complication rates were collected.

Results

There was no significant difference between the demographics of the patients in both groups. The median operation time, median postoperative hospital stay and conversion rate in group 2 were significantly higher than those of group 1. More postoperative complications were seen in group 2.

Conclusion

Early cholecystectomy after ERCP, within 72 h, has better outcomes, probably due to the inflammatory processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World J Surg. 2003;27:180–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lakatos L, Mester G, Reti G, Nagy A, Lakatos PL. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996–2002. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:3495–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko CW, Lee SP. Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. The NIH State-of-the Science Conference: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim KH, Kim W, Lee HI, Sung CK. Prediction of common bile duct stones: its validation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1574–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fink AS. Current dilemmas in management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geron N, Reshef R, Shiller M. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:452–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cushieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, et al. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:952–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhodes M, Susman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet. 1998;351:159–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Committee. Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:856–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor EW, Rajgopal U, Festekjian J. The efficacy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection and cleearence of choledocholithiasis. J Soc Laparosc Surg. 2000;4:109–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirota M, Miura F, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Förster S, Klar E. Common bile duct stones. Diagnostic and therapeutic management (in German with English abstract). Chirurg. 2008;79:881–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarli L, Pietra N, Franze A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, et al. Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, Ghitulescu G, Steinmetz O, Pham C, et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;220:32–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Onken JE, Brazer SR, Eisen GM, Williams DM, et al. Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastreoenterol. 1996;91:762–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barr LL, Frame BC, Coulanjon A. Proposed criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograte cholangiography in candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:778–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, et al. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy. 1997;29:182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma SK, Larson KA, Adler Z, Goldfarb MA. Role of cholangiopancreatography in the management of suspected choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:868–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Kalloo AN, Petersen BT, et al. Standards of practice committee. An annotated algorithm for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:864–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Romano F, Franciosi C, Caprotti R, De Fina S, Lomazzi A, Colombo G, et al. Preoperative selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy without cholangiography. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:408–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165:390–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bergamaschi R, Tuech JJ, Braconier L, Walsøe HK, Mårvik R, Boyet J, et al. Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones. Am J Surg. 1999;178:46–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32(2):106–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Costi R, DiMauro D, Mazzeo A, Boselli AS, Contini S, Violi V, et al. Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk? Surg Endosc. 2007;21(1):41–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, et al. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:761–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lau JY, Leow CK, Fung TM, Suen BY, Yu LM, Lai PB, et al. Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:96–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hazan D, Geron N, Golijanin D, Reissman P, Shiloni E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:773–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kilciler G, Musabak U, Bagci S, Yesilova Z, Tuzun A, Uygun A, et al. Do the changes in the serum levels of IL-2, IL-4, TNFα, and IL-6 reflect the inflammatory activity in the patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis? Clin Dev Immunol. 2008;2008:481560.

  29. Chen CC, Wang SS, Lu RH, Lu CC, Chang FY, Lee SD. Early changes of serum proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas. 2003;26:375–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bulent Salman.

About this article

Cite this article

Salman, B., Yılmaz, U., Kerem, M. et al. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in cholelithiasis coexisting with choledocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16, 832–836 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0169-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0169-4

Keywords

Navigation