Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neural network modeling supports a theory on the hierarchical control of prehension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theory on the hierarchical organization of the control of human prehension (grasping and manipulation of a hand-held object) was tested by comparing the performances of neural networks of different designs. The inputs into the networks were external torque, handle width, and thumb location, and the outputs were the individual digit forces. The networks differed only in their architecture: N1 was a classical three-layer network; N2 was a hierarchical two-tier network with single projections, in which the outputs of the first tier were used as inputs for the second tier, that yielded the individual digit forces; and N3 was a hierarchical two-tier network with dual projections, where the inputs to the second tier were the outputs of the first tier—as in N2—plus the inputs into the first tier (external torque, handle width, and thumb location). Each tier of N2 and N3 consisted of one three-layer network. The N3 network showed the best performance, supporting the idea that the control of prehension is hierarchically organized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a–c
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iberall T, Preti MJ, Zemke R (1989) Task influence on timing and grasp patterns in human prehension. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:397

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iberall T, Fagg AH (1996) The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. In: Neural network models for selecting hand shapes. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 243–264

  3. Gao F, Li S, Li ZM, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Matrix analyses of interaction among fingers in static force production tasks. Biol Cybern 89:407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML, Bose NK (2002) Anatomically and experimentally based neural networks modeling force coordination in static multi-finger tasks. Neurocomputing 47:259–275

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Uno Y, Fukumara N, Suzuki R, Kawato NM (1993) Integration of visual and somatosensory information for preshaping hand in grasping movements. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 5:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taha Z, Brown R, Wright D (1997) Modelling and simulation of hand grasping using neural networks. Med Eng Phys 19:536–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (1998) Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling. Biol Cybern 79:139–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. II. Control. Biol Cybern 87:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. I. Biomechanics. Biol Cybern 87:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner EP, Kandel ER (2000) Touch. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 451–471

  11. Baud-Bovy G, Soechting JF (2001) Two virtual fingers in the control of the tripod grasp. J Neurophysiol 86:604–615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baud-Bovy G, Soechting JF (2002) Factors influencing variability in load forces in a tripod grasp. Exp Brain Res 143:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML, Gao F, Shim JK (2003) The principle of superposition in human prehension. Robotica 22:231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2003) Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques. Exp Brain Res 148:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iberall T (1987) The nature of human prehension: three dexterous hands in one. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, 31 March–3 April 1987

  16. Iberall T (1997) Human prehension and dexterous robot hands. Int J Robot Res 16:285–299

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cutkosky MR (1989) On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. IEEE T Robotic Autom 5:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cutkosky MR, Howe RD (1990) Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In: Venkataraman T, Iberall T (eds) Dextrous robot hands. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 5–31

  19. MackKenzie CL, Iberall T (1994) The grasping hand. North-Holland, New York

  20. Smeets JB, Brenner E (2002) Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping. Behav Brain Res 136:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amaral DG (2000) The functional organization of perception and movement. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 337–348

  22. Ghez C, Thach WT (2000) The cerebellum. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds) Principles of neural science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 832–852

  23. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks. A comprehensive foundation. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  24. Bose NK, Liang P (1996) Neural network fundamentals with graphs, algorithms, and applications (McGraw-Hill Electrical and Computer Engineering Series). McGraw-Hill, New York

  25. Demuth H, Beale M (2000) Neural network toolbox user’s guide. The Mathworks Inc, Natick, MA

  26. Latash ML (1993) Control of human movement. Human kinetics, Urbana, IL

  27. Hendry SHC, Roberts JL, Squire LR (1999) Somatic sensation. In: Zigmond M et al (eds) Fundamental neuroscience. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 761–789

  28. Bastian AJ, Mugnaini E, Thach WT (1999) Cerebellum. In: Zigmond M et al (eds) Fundamental neuroscience. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 973–992

  29. Houk JC, Buckingham JT, Barto AG (1996) Models of the cerebellum and motor learning. Behav Brain Sci 19:368–383

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2:338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arimoto S, Nguyen PTA (2001) Principle of superposition for realising dexterous pinching motions of a pair of robot fingers with soft-tips. IEICE T Fund Electr E84A:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arimoto S, Tahara K, Yamaguchi M, Nguyen PTA, Han MY (2001) Principles of superposition for controlling pinch motions by means of robot fingers with soft tips. Robotica 19:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Prehension synergies: trial-to trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res 152:173–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Zong-Ming Li and Jeremy Smith for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by grants AG-018751, NS-35032 and AR- 048563 from the National Institutes of Health, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomechanics Lab, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 36 Rec. Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Fan Gao & Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky

  2. Motor Control Lab, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Mark L. Latash

Authors
  1. Fan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark L. Latash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, F., Latash, M.L. & Zatsiorsky, V.M. Neural network modeling supports a theory on the hierarchical control of prehension. Neural Comput & Applic 13, 352–359 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0430-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0430-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation